Blast injuries: The experience of a level 1 trauma center.

Uri Neeman, Eyal Hashavia, Dror Soffer, Idit Timor, David Zeltser, Hagit Padova, Neta Cohen
{"title":"Blast injuries: The experience of a level 1 trauma center.","authors":"Uri Neeman, Eyal Hashavia, Dror Soffer, Idit Timor, David Zeltser, Hagit Padova, Neta Cohen","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a global surge in blast injuries, which are associated with high morbidity and mortality. To our knowledge, there are no guidelines for the management of blast injuries in the trauma bay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective cohort study utilized data on all patients admitted to our emergency department (ED) with terror- or combat-related injuries between October 7, 2023 (Gaza Iron Swords War onset) and February 4, 2024. The primary outcome was trauma severity indicated by either an injury severity score (ISS) >15 and/or need for acute care. We also analyzed the mechanisms of injuries, focusing on those resulting from blasts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 208 patients who were admitted following terror-and combat related injuries, 109 patients (101 males [93 %], median age 24.0 years) were admitted following blast injuries. Of them, 88 % were military personnel and 12 % were civilians, with a median ISS of 8 [IQR:4.0-17.0]. The level of trauma was severe in 48 patients (44 %). Tertiary sub-category of blast injuries (P =0.004), chest (P =0.032), abdomen (P =0.018), and lower extremities (P =0.044) injuries were significantly associated with severe trauma. Blast injuries mandated the urgent availability of specialist personnel and appropriate equipment to contend with multiple life-threatening sequelae of exposure to blasts upon the arrival of the victims to emergency services.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Blast injuries present unique challenges in management and demand a multidisciplinary approach and specialized resources. We present an algorithm for terror- and combat-related blast injuries treated in our trauma bay. The step-by-step procedures may be applicable to any blast injury sustained under variable conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":" ","pages":"111839"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2024.111839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a global surge in blast injuries, which are associated with high morbidity and mortality. To our knowledge, there are no guidelines for the management of blast injuries in the trauma bay.

Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study utilized data on all patients admitted to our emergency department (ED) with terror- or combat-related injuries between October 7, 2023 (Gaza Iron Swords War onset) and February 4, 2024. The primary outcome was trauma severity indicated by either an injury severity score (ISS) >15 and/or need for acute care. We also analyzed the mechanisms of injuries, focusing on those resulting from blasts.

Results: Of 208 patients who were admitted following terror-and combat related injuries, 109 patients (101 males [93 %], median age 24.0 years) were admitted following blast injuries. Of them, 88 % were military personnel and 12 % were civilians, with a median ISS of 8 [IQR:4.0-17.0]. The level of trauma was severe in 48 patients (44 %). Tertiary sub-category of blast injuries (P =0.004), chest (P =0.032), abdomen (P =0.018), and lower extremities (P =0.044) injuries were significantly associated with severe trauma. Blast injuries mandated the urgent availability of specialist personnel and appropriate equipment to contend with multiple life-threatening sequelae of exposure to blasts upon the arrival of the victims to emergency services.

Conclusion: Blast injuries present unique challenges in management and demand a multidisciplinary approach and specialized resources. We present an algorithm for terror- and combat-related blast injuries treated in our trauma bay. The step-by-step procedures may be applicable to any blast injury sustained under variable conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
爆炸伤:一级创伤中心的经验。
背景:全球爆炸伤激增,发病率和死亡率都很高。据我们所知,目前还没有在创伤室处理爆炸伤的指南:这项单中心回顾性队列研究利用了 2023 年 10 月 7 日(加沙铁剑战争爆发)至 2024 年 2 月 4 日期间急诊科(ED)收治的所有恐怖或战斗相关伤害患者的数据。研究的主要结果是创伤严重程度,即受伤严重程度评分 (ISS) >15 和/或是否需要急诊治疗。我们还分析了受伤的机制,重点是爆炸造成的伤害:在 208 名因恐怖和战斗受伤而入院的患者中,109 名患者(101 名男性[93%],中位年龄 24.0 岁)因爆炸受伤而入院。其中 88% 为军人,12% 为平民,ISS 中位数为 8 [IQR:4.0-17.0]。48 名患者(44%)的创伤程度为重伤。爆炸伤(P =0.004)、胸部伤(P =0.032)、腹部伤(P =0.018)和下肢伤(P =0.044)等三级子类别与严重创伤显著相关。爆炸伤需要紧急调用专业人员和适当的设备,以便在受害者到达急救中心时处理多种危及生命的爆炸后遗症:结论:爆炸伤的处理面临独特的挑战,需要多学科方法和专业资源。我们介绍了在创伤室治疗的恐怖和战斗相关爆炸伤的算法。这些循序渐进的程序可适用于任何在不同条件下发生的爆炸伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Commentary on "early surgical care of the anticoagulated hip fracture patient within 24 hours". Whether or not practicing early weight-bearing makes the differences in the risk of reoperation after cephalomedullary nailing. Biodegradable and metallic tension-band fixation for paediatric lateral condyle fracture of the elbow: Correspondence. Commentary on "Fixation of proximal tibial fractures with intramedullary nail and immediate weightbearing: A beneficial alternative". Interhospital transfers in elderly trauma patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1