What extraordinary times tell us about ordinary ones: A multiple case study of precariously employed food retail and service workers in two U.S. state contexts during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Journal of critical public health Pub Date : 2024-05-06 Epub Date: 2024-04-09 DOI:10.55016/ojs/jcph.v1i1.78291
Emilia F Vignola, Sarah B Andrea, Anjum Hajat, Tess D Weathers, Emily Q Ahonen
{"title":"What extraordinary times tell us about ordinary ones: A multiple case study of precariously employed food retail and service workers in two U.S. state contexts during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Emilia F Vignola, Sarah B Andrea, Anjum Hajat, Tess D Weathers, Emily Q Ahonen","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jcph.v1i1.78291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disease prevention relies on a complex interplay between social context and individual behaviors. Work and the employment conditions that shape it are key domains where this interplay occurs, a reality highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic. To explore the links between employment quality and social context as drivers of disease prevention, we conducted a multiple case study of food retail and services workers during COVID-19 in two U.S. states - Indiana and Washington - with differing norms and policy landscapes. We drew on public health surveillance data, government/NGO documents, and media sources to contextualize in-depth interviews with 26 precariously employed food workers. Analysis consisted of a within-case and a cross-case phase, each drawing on state contextual and interview data. Precariously employed food workers in Indiana and Washington had contrasting expectations of employers, government, and public health that we interpret as parallels of policies and norms in their respective states. Workers in both states discussed preventive behaviors in an individualized way, but appeared motivated by different constraints on their choices. Our study points to the importance of explicitly considering employment and the social safety net in public health to better prepare us for the next crisis and ameliorate health inequities under ordinary circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":520086,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical public health","volume":"1 1","pages":"45-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/jcph.v1i1.78291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disease prevention relies on a complex interplay between social context and individual behaviors. Work and the employment conditions that shape it are key domains where this interplay occurs, a reality highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic. To explore the links between employment quality and social context as drivers of disease prevention, we conducted a multiple case study of food retail and services workers during COVID-19 in two U.S. states - Indiana and Washington - with differing norms and policy landscapes. We drew on public health surveillance data, government/NGO documents, and media sources to contextualize in-depth interviews with 26 precariously employed food workers. Analysis consisted of a within-case and a cross-case phase, each drawing on state contextual and interview data. Precariously employed food workers in Indiana and Washington had contrasting expectations of employers, government, and public health that we interpret as parallels of policies and norms in their respective states. Workers in both states discussed preventive behaviors in an individualized way, but appeared motivated by different constraints on their choices. Our study points to the importance of explicitly considering employment and the social safety net in public health to better prepare us for the next crisis and ameliorate health inequities under ordinary circumstances.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非常时期对普通时期的启示:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对美国两个州岌岌可危的食品零售和服务业工人进行多案例研究。
疾病预防依赖于社会环境和个人行为之间复杂的相互作用。工作和形成工作的就业条件是发生这种相互作用的关键领域,COVID-19 大流行病凸显了这一现实。为了探索作为疾病预防驱动力的就业质量和社会环境之间的联系,我们在 COVID-19 期间对美国两个州--印第安纳州和华盛顿州--的食品零售和服务业工人进行了多案例研究,这两个州的规范和政策环境各不相同。我们利用公共卫生监测数据、政府/非政府组织文件和媒体资料,对 26 名就业不稳定的食品从业人员进行了深入访谈。分析包括个案内部分析和交叉分析两个阶段,每个阶段都借鉴了各州的背景和访谈数据。印第安纳州和华盛顿州岌岌可危的食品从业人员对雇主、政府和公共卫生的期望截然不同,我们将其解释为各自州内政策和规范的相似之处。两个州的工人都以个性化的方式讨论了预防行为,但他们的选择似乎受到了不同的限制。我们的研究指出了在公共卫生中明确考虑就业和社会安全网的重要性,以便更好地为下一次危机做好准备,并改善普通情况下的健康不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What extraordinary times tell us about ordinary ones: A multiple case study of precariously employed food retail and service workers in two U.S. state contexts during the COVID-19 pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1