Theater, War, and Revolution in Eighteenth-Century France and Its Empire by Logan J. Connors (review)

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER COMPARATIVE DRAMA Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1353/cdr.2024.a936322
Yann Robert
{"title":"Theater, War, and Revolution in Eighteenth-Century France and Its Empire by Logan J. Connors (review)","authors":"Yann Robert","doi":"10.1353/cdr.2024.a936322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Theater, War, and Revolution in Eighteenth-Century France and Its Empire</em> by Logan J. Connors <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Yann Robert (bio) </li> </ul> Logan J. Connors. <em>Theater, War, and Revolution in Eighteenth-Century France and Its Empire</em>. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2024. Pp. x + 255 + 9 b/w illus. $110.00 hardback, $110.00 eBook. <p>Logan J. Connors gives a telling title, “Total Theater for Total War,” to his monograph’s penultimate chapter, the culmination, in many ways, of the book’s narrative arc. Drawing from David Bell and others, Connors underscores the unprecedented attributes that made wars of the late eighteenth century “total,” from their global span to their reliance on mass conscription and all available national resources. Among these resources was a groundbreaking “total theater,” characterized by “documentary-based dramaturgy, technological innovations, onstage military formations and battles, dramatic characters and actors who were actual soldiers, patriotic song breaks, the use of various military practices and customs in drama, and more” (148). Such strategies of reenactment, liveliness, and intimacy were designed to foster a more intense, unmediated engagement of French spectators in the plays as in the war effort. Totality thus serves as a crucial throughline in Connors’s book (indeed, “total,” “totality,” and “totalizing” appear 99 times). One might argue that it also perfectly captures what makes it such a unique and rewarding read, a veritable “Total Book on Total Theater for Total War.” Total in the remarkable variety of its methodological approaches: literary close-reading, performance studies, cultural military history, gender studies, and architectural analysis, to name a few. And total as well in its topics of interest, so many that it is best to let Connors list them: “plays depicting soldiers, performances in navy theaters and in other military venues, policies to compel soldiers to attend the theater, repertories of public theaters in provincial and colonial cities with significant military populations, the evolving relationship between theatrical diplomacy and armed conflict in colonial and occupied zones, soldier-actors and soldier-writers, the role of both theater and the military as ‘civilizing’ and ‘urbanizing’ forces, dramatic depictions of gender roles in battle and on the home front, public performances of coloniality and military rule, and theater as a tool for teaching combat skills, nationalism, sexuality, xenophobia, and more” (3).</p> <p>Totality need not mean exhaustivity, however, and throughout his monograph Connors identifies topics and areas awaiting further studies. Far from a weakness, this strikes me as a strength, a reflection of the work’s seminal status. Indeed, Connors has accomplished the rare feat of unearthing and mining a completely neglected topic. There have been many studies in the past few decades exploring the interaction between eighteenth-century drama and other spheres commonly understood in performative terms (politics, justice, religion, etc.). These studies, <strong>[End Page 395]</strong> many of which are listed in a footnote on page 147, derive much of their appeal from their bilateral approach, tracing a web of influence in both directions: not only did politics, justice, and religion impact the theatre of the Revolution, as one might have expected, but the new forms of performance and spectatorship that emerged in the late eighteenth century also altered political, legal, and religious practice. Connors adopts the same approach in <em>Theater, War, and Revolution in Eighteenth-Century France and Its Empire</em>, but with theatre and the military. He uncovers the many ways in which the French army transformed French theatre by creating new forms and experiences of dramatic performance, even as he convincingly shows that the theatre had a lasting impact on military norms and practices by serving as a space where the French could reimagine war, the army, and soldier-civilian relationships.</p> <p>Chapters 1 and 2 mostly engage in close readings of plays from the pre-Revolutionary period. The first chapter focuses on <em>Le Siège de Calais</em>, written in response to France’s defeat in the Seven Years’ War and lauded by its author as France’s first national tragedy. This wildly successful play launched a wave of war dramas that together forged and popularized a new definition of patriotism and a new relationship between French spectators and their military. Chapter 2 studies a different subgenre of soldier plays, hitherto...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":39600,"journal":{"name":"COMPARATIVE DRAMA","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMPARATIVE DRAMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cdr.2024.a936322","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Theater, War, and Revolution in Eighteenth-Century France and Its Empire by Logan J. Connors
  • Yann Robert (bio)
Logan J. Connors. Theater, War, and Revolution in Eighteenth-Century France and Its Empire. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2024. Pp. x + 255 + 9 b/w illus. $110.00 hardback, $110.00 eBook.

Logan J. Connors gives a telling title, “Total Theater for Total War,” to his monograph’s penultimate chapter, the culmination, in many ways, of the book’s narrative arc. Drawing from David Bell and others, Connors underscores the unprecedented attributes that made wars of the late eighteenth century “total,” from their global span to their reliance on mass conscription and all available national resources. Among these resources was a groundbreaking “total theater,” characterized by “documentary-based dramaturgy, technological innovations, onstage military formations and battles, dramatic characters and actors who were actual soldiers, patriotic song breaks, the use of various military practices and customs in drama, and more” (148). Such strategies of reenactment, liveliness, and intimacy were designed to foster a more intense, unmediated engagement of French spectators in the plays as in the war effort. Totality thus serves as a crucial throughline in Connors’s book (indeed, “total,” “totality,” and “totalizing” appear 99 times). One might argue that it also perfectly captures what makes it such a unique and rewarding read, a veritable “Total Book on Total Theater for Total War.” Total in the remarkable variety of its methodological approaches: literary close-reading, performance studies, cultural military history, gender studies, and architectural analysis, to name a few. And total as well in its topics of interest, so many that it is best to let Connors list them: “plays depicting soldiers, performances in navy theaters and in other military venues, policies to compel soldiers to attend the theater, repertories of public theaters in provincial and colonial cities with significant military populations, the evolving relationship between theatrical diplomacy and armed conflict in colonial and occupied zones, soldier-actors and soldier-writers, the role of both theater and the military as ‘civilizing’ and ‘urbanizing’ forces, dramatic depictions of gender roles in battle and on the home front, public performances of coloniality and military rule, and theater as a tool for teaching combat skills, nationalism, sexuality, xenophobia, and more” (3).

Totality need not mean exhaustivity, however, and throughout his monograph Connors identifies topics and areas awaiting further studies. Far from a weakness, this strikes me as a strength, a reflection of the work’s seminal status. Indeed, Connors has accomplished the rare feat of unearthing and mining a completely neglected topic. There have been many studies in the past few decades exploring the interaction between eighteenth-century drama and other spheres commonly understood in performative terms (politics, justice, religion, etc.). These studies, [End Page 395] many of which are listed in a footnote on page 147, derive much of their appeal from their bilateral approach, tracing a web of influence in both directions: not only did politics, justice, and religion impact the theatre of the Revolution, as one might have expected, but the new forms of performance and spectatorship that emerged in the late eighteenth century also altered political, legal, and religious practice. Connors adopts the same approach in Theater, War, and Revolution in Eighteenth-Century France and Its Empire, but with theatre and the military. He uncovers the many ways in which the French army transformed French theatre by creating new forms and experiences of dramatic performance, even as he convincingly shows that the theatre had a lasting impact on military norms and practices by serving as a space where the French could reimagine war, the army, and soldier-civilian relationships.

Chapters 1 and 2 mostly engage in close readings of plays from the pre-Revolutionary period. The first chapter focuses on Le Siège de Calais, written in response to France’s defeat in the Seven Years’ War and lauded by its author as France’s first national tragedy. This wildly successful play launched a wave of war dramas that together forged and popularized a new definition of patriotism and a new relationship between French spectators and their military. Chapter 2 studies a different subgenre of soldier plays, hitherto...

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
十八世纪法国及其帝国的戏剧、战争与革命》,作者 Logan J. Connors(评论)
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 十八世纪法国及其帝国的戏剧、战争与革命》,作者 Logan J. Connors Yann Robert (bio) Logan J. Connors。十八世纪法国及其帝国的戏剧、战争与革命》。英国剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2024 年。x + 255 + 9 幅黑白插图。精装本 110.00 美元,电子书 110.00 美元。洛根-J-康纳斯(Logan J. Connors)为其专著的倒数第二章起了一个很有说服力的标题--"全面战争的全面剧场",从很多方面来说,这一章是全书叙事弧线的顶点。康纳斯借鉴戴维-贝尔等人的观点,强调了使 18 世纪晚期的战争成为 "全面战争 "的史无前例的特性,包括战争的全球跨度、对大规模征兵的依赖以及所有可用的国家资源。在这些资源中,有一种开创性的 "全面戏剧",其特点是 "以纪录片为基础的戏剧创作、技术创新、舞台上的军事阵型和战斗、由真实士兵扮演的戏剧人物和演员、爱国歌曲插曲、在戏剧中使用各种军事实践和习俗等等"(148)。这种重现、生动和亲密的策略旨在促进法国观众更强烈、更直接地参与到戏剧中,就像参与到战争中一样。因此,"总体性 "是康纳斯著作中的一条重要线索(事实上,"总体"、"总体性 "和 "总体化 "出现了 99 次)。也许有人会说,这也完美地抓住了本书的独特之处,使其成为一本名副其实的 "全面战争的全面战区之书"。全面性体现在其方法论的非凡多样性:文学细读、表演研究、文化军事史、性别研究和建筑分析等等。其关注的主题也很全面,多到最好让康纳斯一一列举:"描写士兵的戏剧、海军剧院和其他军事场所的演出、强迫士兵观看戏剧的政策、拥有大量军人的省级和殖民地城市的公共剧院剧目、殖民地和占领区戏剧外交与武装冲突之间不断演变的关系、士兵演员和士兵作家,戏剧和军队作为'文明化'和'城市化'力量的作用,戏剧对战斗中和后方性别角色的描述,殖民地和军事统治的公开表演,以及戏剧作为传授战斗技能、民族主义、性、仇外心理等的工具"(3)。然而,全面并不意味着详尽,康纳斯在其专著中指出了有待进一步研究的主题和领域。在我看来,这不仅不是缺点,反而是优点,体现了该著作的开创性地位。事实上,康纳斯完成了一项罕见的壮举,即发现并挖掘了一个完全被忽视的课题。在过去的几十年中,有许多研究探讨了十八世纪戏剧与通常以表演术语理解的其他领域(政治、司法、宗教等)之间的互动关系。这些研究[第395页完]中的许多都列在第147页的脚注中,它们的吸引力很大程度上来自于其双边方法,追溯了一个双向影响的网络:不仅政治、司法和宗教影响了革命的戏剧,正如人们所预料的那样,而且18世纪晚期出现的新的表演和观赏形式也改变了政治、法律和宗教实践。康纳斯在《十八世纪法国及其帝国的戏剧、战争和革命》中采用了同样的方法,但涉及的是戏剧和军事。他揭示了法国军队通过创造戏剧表演的新形式和新体验改变法国戏剧的多种方式,同时令人信服地表明,戏剧作为法国人重新想象战争、军队以及士兵与平民关系的空间,对军事规范和实践产生了持久的影响。第一章和第二章主要是对革命前时期的戏剧进行细读。第一章的重点是《加莱岛之战》(Le Siège de Calais),该剧是为应对法国在七年战争中的失败而创作的,被作者誉为法国的第一部民族悲剧。这部获得巨大成功的戏剧掀起了战争剧的浪潮,共同塑造并普及了爱国主义的新定义以及法国观众与军队之间的新关系。第 2 章研究了士兵剧中的另一个亚类型,迄今为止,该亚类型还未在法国的戏剧舞台上出现过。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
COMPARATIVE DRAMA
COMPARATIVE DRAMA Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Comparative Drama (ISSN 0010-4078) is a scholarly journal devoted to studies international in spirit and interdisciplinary in scope; it is published quarterly (Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter) at Western Michigan University
期刊最新文献
In Memoriam: Clifford O. Davidson: 1932–2024 "Simply Sitting in a Chair": Questioning Representational Practice and Dramatic Convention in Marguerite Duras's L'Amante anglaise and The Viaducts of Seine-et-Oise Rewriting Idolatry: Doctor Faustus and Romeo and Juliet Measuring Protagonism in Early Modern European Theatre: A Distant Reading of the Character of Sophonisba Theater, War, and Revolution in Eighteenth-Century France and Its Empire by Logan J. Connors (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1