Gut microbiota as an efficacy marker of surgical treatment of obesity.

Q4 Medicine Wiadomosci lekarskie Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.36740/WLek202407122
Olexandr Y Ioffe, Pavlo A Kobzar, Oleg V Shvets, Mykola S Kryvopustov, Olexandr P Stetsenko, Tetiana V Tarasiuk, Olena V Dema
{"title":"Gut microbiota as an efficacy marker of surgical treatment of obesity.","authors":"Olexandr Y Ioffe, Pavlo A Kobzar, Oleg V Shvets, Mykola S Kryvopustov, Olexandr P Stetsenko, Tetiana V Tarasiuk, Olena V Dema","doi":"10.36740/WLek202407122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aim: To study the impact of bariatric interventions on changes in the parameters of the intestinal microbiome.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Materials and Methods: The research method is a prospective observational cohort monocentric study. 112 patients were included in the study. All patients had indications for surgical obesity treatment due to IFSO criteria. All patients were offered surgical treatment. 53 patients who consented to the operation formed the study group. 59 patients who refused surgical treatment formed the control group. The result of the study was evaluated one year after the start of treatment. The studied group of patients underwent bariatric interventions. The control group consisted of 59 obese patients who were treated conservatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results: evaluating criteria was: %EWL (percentage of excess weight loss), comorbidity regression, life quality improvement. Overwhelming majority of surgically treated patients with gut microbiome composition improvement reached %EWL≥50. Patients who didn't have improvements in gut microbiota composition had insufficient efficacy of surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conclusions: 1) Surgical treatment of obesity leads to the positive changes in the gut microbiota. 2) Operated patients, who had positive dynamics in changes of gut microbiota demonstrated sufficient efficacy of surgical treatment due to %EWL. 3) Firmicutes/Bacteriodetes ratio and Bacterioidetes/Faecalibacterium ratio can be one of the criteria of the efficacy of surgical treatment of obesity. 4) Patients of the control group, had positive dynamics of changes in gut microbiota much rarely than operated patients and the effectiveness of obesity treatment was insufficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":23643,"journal":{"name":"Wiadomosci lekarskie","volume":"77 7","pages":"1464-1469"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiadomosci lekarskie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek202407122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Aim: To study the impact of bariatric interventions on changes in the parameters of the intestinal microbiome.

Patients and methods: Materials and Methods: The research method is a prospective observational cohort monocentric study. 112 patients were included in the study. All patients had indications for surgical obesity treatment due to IFSO criteria. All patients were offered surgical treatment. 53 patients who consented to the operation formed the study group. 59 patients who refused surgical treatment formed the control group. The result of the study was evaluated one year after the start of treatment. The studied group of patients underwent bariatric interventions. The control group consisted of 59 obese patients who were treated conservatively.

Results: Results: evaluating criteria was: %EWL (percentage of excess weight loss), comorbidity regression, life quality improvement. Overwhelming majority of surgically treated patients with gut microbiome composition improvement reached %EWL≥50. Patients who didn't have improvements in gut microbiota composition had insufficient efficacy of surgical treatment.

Conclusion: Conclusions: 1) Surgical treatment of obesity leads to the positive changes in the gut microbiota. 2) Operated patients, who had positive dynamics in changes of gut microbiota demonstrated sufficient efficacy of surgical treatment due to %EWL. 3) Firmicutes/Bacteriodetes ratio and Bacterioidetes/Faecalibacterium ratio can be one of the criteria of the efficacy of surgical treatment of obesity. 4) Patients of the control group, had positive dynamics of changes in gut microbiota much rarely than operated patients and the effectiveness of obesity treatment was insufficient.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肠道微生物群是肥胖症手术治疗的疗效标志。
目的:研究减肥干预对肠道微生物组参数变化的影响:目的:研究减肥干预对肠道微生物组参数变化的影响:材料与方法:研究方法为前瞻性观察队列单中心研究。研究共纳入 112 名患者。根据 IFSO 标准,所有患者都有手术治疗肥胖症的指征。所有患者都接受了手术治疗。53名同意手术的患者组成研究组。59 名拒绝手术治疗的患者组成对照组。研究结果在治疗开始一年后进行评估。研究组患者接受了减肥干预。对照组由 59 名接受保守治疗的肥胖患者组成:结果:评估标准为:超重百分比(%EWL)、合并症消退、生活质量改善。绝大多数接受手术治疗的患者的肠道微生物组成分改善率达到%EWL≥50。肠道微生物群组成未得到改善的患者,手术治疗效果不佳:结论1)肥胖症手术治疗会导致肠道微生物群发生积极变化。2)手术患者的肠道微生物群发生了积极的动态变化,表明手术治疗的疗效充足,这归功于%EWL。3)固着菌/菌落总数比和菌落总数/粪杆菌比可以作为肥胖症手术治疗效果的标准之一。4)对照组患者肠道微生物群发生积极动态变化的情况比手术组患者少得多,肥胖症治疗效果不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wiadomosci lekarskie
Wiadomosci lekarskie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
482
期刊最新文献
Abuse of right during application of coercive medical measures in criminal proceedings. Aggressive parenting: social, medical and legal aspects. Clinical classification of liver cirrhosis - a way to plan individual definitive treatment. Comparative analysis of the quality of life of women who left the territory of Ukraine during the ongoing Russia - Ukraine war and women who stayed at their homes. COVID-19 associated anosmia in pediatric patients: subject publications review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1