Defining the future of occupational therapy: A concept analysis of leadership development.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2024-08-30 Epub Date: 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1080/11038128.2024.2399709
Tracey E Recigno, Jewel Shepherd, Paula Kramer, Jessica McHugh Conlin
{"title":"Defining the future of occupational therapy: A concept analysis of leadership development.","authors":"Tracey E Recigno, Jewel Shepherd, Paula Kramer, Jessica McHugh Conlin","doi":"10.1080/11038128.2024.2399709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In occupational therapy, leadership development is a fundamental skill and social process needed to advance the profession. However, there is scant literature on leadership development. Further examination of leadership development in the occupational therapy literature may provide helpful insights and strengthen the opportunity to study this concept and its efficacy.</p><p><strong>Aims/objectives: </strong>The focus of this concept analysis was to conduct a review of the historical and contemporary occupational therapy literature to evaluate how the profession distinguishes the concept of leadership development.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>A principle-based concept analysis provides holistic perspectives of a concept by examining its historical and linguistic foundations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dialogue about leadership development was primarily situated in grey literature with few articles found in empirical-focused, peer-reviewed journals. The analysis revealed that leadership development was understood as both a process and an outcome and was intended to support the promotion of the profession.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite using similar language to describe the concept, the literature did not yield one cohesive definition of leadership development.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>A definition was proposed that integrated the various perspectives to support future empirical research around a centralized understanding of the concept of leadership development.</p>","PeriodicalId":49570,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2024.2399709","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In occupational therapy, leadership development is a fundamental skill and social process needed to advance the profession. However, there is scant literature on leadership development. Further examination of leadership development in the occupational therapy literature may provide helpful insights and strengthen the opportunity to study this concept and its efficacy.

Aims/objectives: The focus of this concept analysis was to conduct a review of the historical and contemporary occupational therapy literature to evaluate how the profession distinguishes the concept of leadership development.

Material and method: A principle-based concept analysis provides holistic perspectives of a concept by examining its historical and linguistic foundations.

Results: Dialogue about leadership development was primarily situated in grey literature with few articles found in empirical-focused, peer-reviewed journals. The analysis revealed that leadership development was understood as both a process and an outcome and was intended to support the promotion of the profession.

Conclusion: Despite using similar language to describe the concept, the literature did not yield one cohesive definition of leadership development.

Significance: A definition was proposed that integrated the various perspectives to support future empirical research around a centralized understanding of the concept of leadership development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定义职业疗法的未来:领导力发展的概念分析。
背景:在职业治疗领域,领导力发展是一项基本技能,也是推动职业发展所需的社会过程。然而,有关领导力发展的文献却很少。进一步研究职业治疗文献中的领导力发展可能会提供有益的见解,并加强研究这一概念及其功效的机会:本概念分析的重点是对历史和当代职业治疗文献进行回顾,以评估该行业如何区分领导力发展这一概念:基于原则的概念分析通过考察一个概念的历史和语言基础,为其提供整体视角:关于领导力发展的对话主要集中在灰色文献中,在注重实证的同行评议期刊中发现的文章很少。分析表明,领导力发展既被理解为一个过程,也被理解为一个结果,其目的是支持专业的发展:结论:尽管文献使用了类似的语言来描述领导力发展这一概念,但并没有得出一个统一的定义:意义:提出的定义综合了各种观点,有助于未来围绕领导力发展概念的集中理解开展实证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy is an internationally well-recognized journal that aims to provide a forum for occupational therapy research worldwide and especially the Nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy welcomes: theoretical frameworks, original research reports emanating from quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies, literature reviews, case studies, presentation and evaluation of instruments, evaluation of interventions, learning and teaching in OT, letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Occupational therapy's oversight: How science veiled our humanity. Defining the future of occupational therapy: A concept analysis of leadership development. Fostering social participation among older adults: Perspectives of stakeholders. 'A new sense of my former self' - transforming the self through vocational rehabilitation for people with acquired brain injury. Psychometric properties of the arabic version of occupational value with pre-defined ítems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1