Exploring interactive behaviours of urban and rural teachers in blended synchronous classrooms: Insights from a proposed interaction analysis framework

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Education Pub Date : 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105152
Cuixin Li , Dan Sun , Jie Xu , Yifan Zhu , Yumei Huang , Wenjing Zheng , Xingzhong Tang , Yan Li
{"title":"Exploring interactive behaviours of urban and rural teachers in blended synchronous classrooms: Insights from a proposed interaction analysis framework","authors":"Cuixin Li ,&nbsp;Dan Sun ,&nbsp;Jie Xu ,&nbsp;Yifan Zhu ,&nbsp;Yumei Huang ,&nbsp;Wenjing Zheng ,&nbsp;Xingzhong Tang ,&nbsp;Yan Li","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Blended synchronous classrooms (BSCs) play a critical role in narrowing the educational gap between urban and rural areas in China, promoting educational equity. In BSCs, the quantity and quality of interactive teaching behaviours of urban and rural teachers may significantly influence the learning experiences of students in both urban and rural settings, and they are supposed to be different from interactive teaching behaviours that happen in traditional classrooms. However, there is limited research on the characteristics of such interactive teaching behaviours in BSCs. To address the gap, this study first proposed an interaction analysis framework for BSCs (IAF4BSCs) and then examined the interactive teaching behaviours of urban and rural teachers in BSCs using this framework, along with various learning analytics methods including lag sequential analysis, frequent sequence mining and thematic analysis. The data analysis yielded the following results: (1) Urban teachers exhibited more speech behaviours such as lecturing and providing immediate feedback, whereas rural teachers engaged more in non-speech behaviours like classroom patrols. (2) Despite the expectation for urban teachers to interact equally with urban and rural students in BSCs, they predominantly focused on urban students. (3) Urban teachers demonstrated diverse interaction sequences with both urban and rural students, whereas rural teachers primarily interacted with rural students. (4) Interviews with teachers and students revealed both positive and negative aspects of interactive teaching behaviours in BSCs. Based on these findings, the study proposed three pedagogical recommendations to enhance interactive teaching behaviours in BSCs: increasing interactive participation, integrating technology more effectively and emphasizing post-class assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 105152"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131524001660","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blended synchronous classrooms (BSCs) play a critical role in narrowing the educational gap between urban and rural areas in China, promoting educational equity. In BSCs, the quantity and quality of interactive teaching behaviours of urban and rural teachers may significantly influence the learning experiences of students in both urban and rural settings, and they are supposed to be different from interactive teaching behaviours that happen in traditional classrooms. However, there is limited research on the characteristics of such interactive teaching behaviours in BSCs. To address the gap, this study first proposed an interaction analysis framework for BSCs (IAF4BSCs) and then examined the interactive teaching behaviours of urban and rural teachers in BSCs using this framework, along with various learning analytics methods including lag sequential analysis, frequent sequence mining and thematic analysis. The data analysis yielded the following results: (1) Urban teachers exhibited more speech behaviours such as lecturing and providing immediate feedback, whereas rural teachers engaged more in non-speech behaviours like classroom patrols. (2) Despite the expectation for urban teachers to interact equally with urban and rural students in BSCs, they predominantly focused on urban students. (3) Urban teachers demonstrated diverse interaction sequences with both urban and rural students, whereas rural teachers primarily interacted with rural students. (4) Interviews with teachers and students revealed both positive and negative aspects of interactive teaching behaviours in BSCs. Based on these findings, the study proposed three pedagogical recommendations to enhance interactive teaching behaviours in BSCs: increasing interactive participation, integrating technology more effectively and emphasizing post-class assessment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索城市和农村教师在混合同步课堂中的互动行为:拟议互动分析框架的启示
混合式同步课堂(BSC)在缩小中国城乡教育差距、促进教育公平方面发挥着至关重要的作用。在 BSCs 中,城乡教师互动教学行为的数量和质量可能会极大地影响城乡学生的学习体验,而这些互动教学行为理应有别于传统课堂中的互动教学行为。然而,关于这种互动式教学行为特点的研究却十分有限。为了弥补这一空白,本研究首先提出了一个 BSCs 互动分析框架(IAF4BSCs),然后利用这一框架,结合各种学习分析方法,包括滞后序列分析、频繁序列挖掘和主题分析,研究了 BSCs 中城市和农村教师的互动教学行为。数据分析得出以下结果:(1)城市教师表现出更多的言语行为,如讲课和提供即时反馈,而农村教师则更多地参与非言语行为,如课堂巡视。(2) 尽管期望城市教师在 BSCs 中与城市和农村学生平等互动,但他们主要关注城市学生。(3) 城市教师在与城市和农村学生的互动过程中表现出多样性,而农村教师则主要与农村学生互动。(4) 通过对教师和学生的访谈,发现了在 BSCs 中互动教学行为的积极和消极方面。基于这些研究结果,研究提出了三项教学建议,以加强BSCs中的互动教学行为:增加互动参与、更有效地整合技术和强调课后评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
期刊最新文献
Personalization in educational gamification: Learners with different trait competitiveness benefit differently from rankings on leaderboards Reducing interpretative ambiguity in an educational environment with ChatGPT Editorial Board “Storytelling and educational robotics: A scoping review (2004–2024)” Advancing a Practical Inquiry Model with multi-perspective role-playing to foster critical thinking behavior in e-book reading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1