Cooking readiness in stressful times: Navigating food choices for a healthier future

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Appetite Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2024.107652
{"title":"Cooking readiness in stressful times: Navigating food choices for a healthier future","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Food choice is a complex function of preferences and combines a myriad of food-related factors, such as biological, economic, physical, social, and psychological determinants. People's food choices directly affect their health and can have both positive and negative outcomes. For instance, the pandemic may have presented an opportunity to cook more at home, eventually resulting in dietary benefits, health improvements, and reduced stress. Conversely, adverse behavioral, psychological, and physical outcomes, such as overeating, have also been associated with stressful situations. Therefore, the aim of this study is twofold: first, to propose “cooking readiness” as a higher-order construct, in which ‘food literacy’ and ‘cooking skills’ correspond to the capability, ‘cooking attitudes’ reflect the motivation, and the variable ‘COVID-19 restrictions’ represent the opportunity for consumers to cook and consume healthier food at home. Furthermore, as the pandemic scenario was imposed and caused changes in mental health and emotional mood, the second objective is to explore the relationship between cooking readiness and stress levels in consumers' choices for nutritionally recommended (or non-recommended) food. Cross-country data (Brazil, Denmark) from 1074 consumers was analyzed using structural equation modeling. This study confirms cooking readiness as a higher-order construct, integrating food literacy, cooking skills, and cooking attitudes with pandemic-induced opportunities. Cooking readiness is crucial in promoting healthier eating habits, particularly in Brazil. The stronger tradition of healthier eating in Denmark may mitigate the impact of cooking readiness on reducing non-recommended food consumption. The varying effects of stress on food choices between the two countries underscore the need for tailored public health strategies that consider cultural differences and existing dietary habits. Promoting cooking skills and food literacy, particularly in times of crisis, can be instrumental in supporting healthier food choices and improving public health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666324004550","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food choice is a complex function of preferences and combines a myriad of food-related factors, such as biological, economic, physical, social, and psychological determinants. People's food choices directly affect their health and can have both positive and negative outcomes. For instance, the pandemic may have presented an opportunity to cook more at home, eventually resulting in dietary benefits, health improvements, and reduced stress. Conversely, adverse behavioral, psychological, and physical outcomes, such as overeating, have also been associated with stressful situations. Therefore, the aim of this study is twofold: first, to propose “cooking readiness” as a higher-order construct, in which ‘food literacy’ and ‘cooking skills’ correspond to the capability, ‘cooking attitudes’ reflect the motivation, and the variable ‘COVID-19 restrictions’ represent the opportunity for consumers to cook and consume healthier food at home. Furthermore, as the pandemic scenario was imposed and caused changes in mental health and emotional mood, the second objective is to explore the relationship between cooking readiness and stress levels in consumers' choices for nutritionally recommended (or non-recommended) food. Cross-country data (Brazil, Denmark) from 1074 consumers was analyzed using structural equation modeling. This study confirms cooking readiness as a higher-order construct, integrating food literacy, cooking skills, and cooking attitudes with pandemic-induced opportunities. Cooking readiness is crucial in promoting healthier eating habits, particularly in Brazil. The stronger tradition of healthier eating in Denmark may mitigate the impact of cooking readiness on reducing non-recommended food consumption. The varying effects of stress on food choices between the two countries underscore the need for tailored public health strategies that consider cultural differences and existing dietary habits. Promoting cooking skills and food literacy, particularly in times of crisis, can be instrumental in supporting healthier food choices and improving public health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
紧张时期的烹饪准备:为更健康的未来选择食物。
食物选择是一个复杂的偏好函数,并结合了无数与食物有关的因素,如生物、经济、身体、社会和心理决定因素。人们的食物选择直接影响他们的健康,并可能产生积极和消极的结果。例如,大流行可能为人们提供了一个在家做更多饭菜的机会,最终带来饮食方面的好处、健康状况的改善以及压力的减轻。相反,暴饮暴食等不良行为、心理和生理结果也与压力状况有关。因此,本研究的目的有二:首先,提出 "烹饪准备 "作为一个高阶建构,其中 "食品知识 "和 "烹饪技能 "对应能力,"烹饪态度 "反映动机,而变量 "COVID-19 限制 "则代表消费者在家烹饪和消费更健康食品的机会。此外,由于大流行病情景被强加并引起了心理健康和情绪的变化,因此第二个目标是探讨消费者在选择营养推荐(或非推荐)食品时烹饪准备程度与压力水平之间的关系。研究采用结构方程模型分析了来自 1,074 名消费者的跨国数据(巴西、丹麦)。这项研究证实,烹饪准备是一个高阶结构,将食品知识、烹饪技能和烹饪态度与大流行病引发的机会结合在一起。烹饪准备对促进健康饮食习惯至关重要,尤其是在巴西。丹麦更健康饮食的传统可能会减轻烹饪准备对减少非推荐食物消费的影响。这两个国家的压力对食物选择的影响各不相同,这凸显出有必要制定考虑到文化差异和现有饮食习惯的有针对性的公共卫生战略。推广烹饪技能和食品知识,尤其是在危机时期,有助于支持更健康的食品选择和改善公众健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
期刊最新文献
Disentangling inhibition toward food and non-food stimuli across two hunger levels: An fNIRS study ‘Handing down of beautiful knowledge’: Yarning with workers about feeding practices and mealtimes in Australian First Nations families Gender differences in the association between body shame and binge eating: Body image flexibility as a moderator in women Intermittent protein restriction elevates food intake and plasma ghrelin in male mice The gratitude model of body appreciation and intuitive eating: Replication and extension of the model to explain intuitive eating facets among young adult women in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1