Phytoremediation of molybdenum (Mo)-contaminated soil using plant and humic substance

IF 6.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.117011
{"title":"Phytoremediation of molybdenum (Mo)-contaminated soil using plant and humic substance","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.117011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The severity of soil molybdenum (Mo) pollution is increasing, and effective management of contaminated soil is essential for the sustainable development of soil. To investigate this, a pot experiment was carried out to assess the impact of different rates of humic acid (HA) and fulvic acid (FA) on the mobility of Mo in soil solution and its uptake by alfalfa, wheat and green bristlegrass. The concentration of Mo in Plants and soil was determined using an Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer. The findings revealed that the application of HA led to an increase in Mo accumulation in the shoot and root of green bristlegrass and wheat, ranging from 10.56 % to 28.73 % and 62.15–115.79 % (shoot), and 17.52–46.53 % and 6.29-81.25 % (root), respectively. Nonetheless, the use of HA resulted in a slight inhibition of plant Mo uptake, leading to reduced Mo accumulation in alfalfa roots compared to the control treatment (from 3284.49 mg/kg to 2140.78–2813.54 mg/kg). On the other hand, the application of FA decreased Mo accumulation in the wheat shoot (from 909.92 mg/kg to 338.54–837.45 mg/kg). Furthermore, the bioavailability of green bristlegrass (with HA) and wheat (with FA) decreased, and the percentage of residual fraction of Mo increased (from 0.39 % to 0.78–0.96 %, from 3.95 % to 3.97∼ 4.34 %). This study aims to elucidate the ternary interaction among Mo, humic substances, and plants (alfalfa, wheat, and green bristlegrass), to enhance both the activation and hyperaccumulation of Mo simultaneously.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":303,"journal":{"name":"Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014765132401087X/pdfft?md5=32c7a00a8bede9da57376186b5d59bea&pid=1-s2.0-S014765132401087X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014765132401087X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The severity of soil molybdenum (Mo) pollution is increasing, and effective management of contaminated soil is essential for the sustainable development of soil. To investigate this, a pot experiment was carried out to assess the impact of different rates of humic acid (HA) and fulvic acid (FA) on the mobility of Mo in soil solution and its uptake by alfalfa, wheat and green bristlegrass. The concentration of Mo in Plants and soil was determined using an Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer. The findings revealed that the application of HA led to an increase in Mo accumulation in the shoot and root of green bristlegrass and wheat, ranging from 10.56 % to 28.73 % and 62.15–115.79 % (shoot), and 17.52–46.53 % and 6.29-81.25 % (root), respectively. Nonetheless, the use of HA resulted in a slight inhibition of plant Mo uptake, leading to reduced Mo accumulation in alfalfa roots compared to the control treatment (from 3284.49 mg/kg to 2140.78–2813.54 mg/kg). On the other hand, the application of FA decreased Mo accumulation in the wheat shoot (from 909.92 mg/kg to 338.54–837.45 mg/kg). Furthermore, the bioavailability of green bristlegrass (with HA) and wheat (with FA) decreased, and the percentage of residual fraction of Mo increased (from 0.39 % to 0.78–0.96 %, from 3.95 % to 3.97∼ 4.34 %). This study aims to elucidate the ternary interaction among Mo, humic substances, and plants (alfalfa, wheat, and green bristlegrass), to enhance both the activation and hyperaccumulation of Mo simultaneously.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用植物和腐殖质对受钼污染的土壤进行植物修复。
土壤钼(Mo)污染日益严重,有效治理污染土壤对土壤的可持续发展至关重要。为此,我们进行了一项盆栽实验,以评估不同比例的腐植酸(HA)和富里酸(FA)对钼在土壤溶液中的流动性以及苜蓿、小麦和青冈草对钼的吸收的影响。使用原子吸收分光光度计测定了植物和土壤中的钼浓度。研究结果表明,施用 HA 后,绿拂草和小麦嫩枝和根部的钼积累量增加,分别为 10.56 % 至 28.73 % 和 62.15-115.79 %(嫩枝),以及 17.52-46.53 % 和 6.29-81.25 %(根部)。不过,与对照处理相比,使用 HA 会轻微抑制植物对钼的吸收,从而减少钼在紫花苜蓿根部的积累(从 3284.49 毫克/千克降至 2140.78-2813.54 毫克/千克)。另一方面,施用 FA 会减少钼在小麦芽中的积累(从 909.92 毫克/千克减少到 338.54-837.45 毫克/千克)。此外,绿刚毛草(施用 HA)和小麦(施用 FA)的生物利用率降低,钼的残留比例增加(从 0.39 % 增加到 0.78-0.96 %,从 3.95 % 增加到 3.97∼4.34 %)。本研究旨在阐明钼、腐殖质和植物(紫花苜蓿、小麦和绿刚毛草)之间的三元相互作用,以同时提高钼的活化和超积累。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
1234
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety is a multi-disciplinary journal that focuses on understanding the exposure and effects of environmental contamination on organisms including human health. The scope of the journal covers three main themes. The topics within these themes, indicated below, include (but are not limited to) the following: Ecotoxicology、Environmental Chemistry、Environmental Safety etc.
期刊最新文献
Global trends and projections of occupational trichloroethylene (TCE) exposure-associated kidney cancer: Insights of the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study 2021 from 1990 to 2021 and prediction to 2050 Bioaerosol emission and exposure risk from a wastewater treatment plant in winter and spring Effects of urinary organophosphate flame retardants in susceptibility to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in school-age children Microplastics in maternal blood, fetal appendages, and umbilical vein blood Aristolochic acid-induced dyslipidemia and hepatotoxicity: The potential role of FXR and AHR receptors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1