Impact of Dyspnea on Adults With Respiratory Symptoms Without a Defined Diagnosis.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Chest Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.183
Jared Bierbrier, Emily Gerstein, George A Whitmore, Katherine L Vandemheen, Celine Bergeron, Louis-Philippe Boulet, Andreanne Cote, Stephen K Field, Erika Penz, R Andrew McIvor, Catherine Lemière, Samir Gupta, Paul Hernandez, Irvin Mayers, Mohit Bhutani, M Diane Lougheed, Christopher J Licskai, Tanweer Azher, Nicole Ezer, Martha Ainslie, Gonzalo G Alvarez, Sunita Mulpuru, Shawn D Aaron
{"title":"Impact of Dyspnea on Adults With Respiratory Symptoms Without a Defined Diagnosis.","authors":"Jared Bierbrier, Emily Gerstein, George A Whitmore, Katherine L Vandemheen, Celine Bergeron, Louis-Philippe Boulet, Andreanne Cote, Stephen K Field, Erika Penz, R Andrew McIvor, Catherine Lemière, Samir Gupta, Paul Hernandez, Irvin Mayers, Mohit Bhutani, M Diane Lougheed, Christopher J Licskai, Tanweer Azher, Nicole Ezer, Martha Ainslie, Gonzalo G Alvarez, Sunita Mulpuru, Shawn D Aaron","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We investigated dyspnea; its associated risk factors; and its impact on health care utilization, quality of life, and work productivity in adults with undiagnosed respiratory symptoms.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>What is the impact of dyspnea in adults with undiagnosed respiratory symptoms?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This population-based study included 2,857 adults who were experiencing respiratory symptoms. These individuals had not been previously diagnosed with any lung conditions and were recruited from 17 Canadian centers using random digit dialing. Each participant underwent spirometry testing both before and after using a bronchodilator to determine if they met the diagnostic criteria for COPD, asthma, or preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm), or if their spirometry results were normal. An age-matched control group (n = 231) was similarly recruited using random digit dialing. A dyspnea impact assessment score from 0 to 100 was produced using questions from the COPD Assessment Test and St. George's Respiratory questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with PRISm (n = 172) reported more impactful dyspnea (mean score, 63.0; 95% CI, 59.5-66.4) than those with undiagnosed asthma (n = 265; mean score, 56.6; 95% CI, 53.9-59.3) or undiagnosed COPD (n = 330; mean score, 57.5; 95% CI, 55.1-59.9). All groups reported significantly more impactful dyspnea than the control group (mean score, 13.8; 95% CI, 11.8-15.7). Patient-specific risk factors including age, sex, BMI, smoking, and comorbidities explained 20.6% of the variation in dyspnea. An additional 12.4% of the variation was explained by disease classification and another 1.7% by the severity of lung function impairment assessed with spirometry. After adjusting for age, sex, and BMI, greater dyspnea impact was associated with increased health care utilization, lower quality of life, and reduced work productivity.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our findings showed that in community-based adults with undiagnosed respiratory symptoms, those identified with PRISm experienced the greatest impact of dyspnea. Dyspnea imposes burdens on the health care system and is associated with impaired quality of life and work productivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.183","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We investigated dyspnea; its associated risk factors; and its impact on health care utilization, quality of life, and work productivity in adults with undiagnosed respiratory symptoms.

Research question: What is the impact of dyspnea in adults with undiagnosed respiratory symptoms?

Study design and methods: This population-based study included 2,857 adults who were experiencing respiratory symptoms. These individuals had not been previously diagnosed with any lung conditions and were recruited from 17 Canadian centers using random digit dialing. Each participant underwent spirometry testing both before and after using a bronchodilator to determine if they met the diagnostic criteria for COPD, asthma, or preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm), or if their spirometry results were normal. An age-matched control group (n = 231) was similarly recruited using random digit dialing. A dyspnea impact assessment score from 0 to 100 was produced using questions from the COPD Assessment Test and St. George's Respiratory questionnaire.

Results: Individuals with PRISm (n = 172) reported more impactful dyspnea (mean score, 63.0; 95% CI, 59.5-66.4) than those with undiagnosed asthma (n = 265; mean score, 56.6; 95% CI, 53.9-59.3) or undiagnosed COPD (n = 330; mean score, 57.5; 95% CI, 55.1-59.9). All groups reported significantly more impactful dyspnea than the control group (mean score, 13.8; 95% CI, 11.8-15.7). Patient-specific risk factors including age, sex, BMI, smoking, and comorbidities explained 20.6% of the variation in dyspnea. An additional 12.4% of the variation was explained by disease classification and another 1.7% by the severity of lung function impairment assessed with spirometry. After adjusting for age, sex, and BMI, greater dyspnea impact was associated with increased health care utilization, lower quality of life, and reduced work productivity.

Interpretation: Our findings showed that in community-based adults with undiagnosed respiratory symptoms, those identified with PRISm experienced the greatest impact of dyspnea. Dyspnea imposes burdens on the health care system and is associated with impaired quality of life and work productivity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
呼吸困难对无明确诊断的成人呼吸道症状的影响。
背景:我们调查了呼吸困难及其相关风险因素,以及呼吸困难对未确诊呼吸道症状成人的医疗利用率、生活质量和工作效率的影响:研究设计与方法:这项以人口为基础的研究纳入了 2857 名有呼吸道症状的成年人。这些人以前未被诊断出患有任何肺部疾病,他们是通过随机数字拨号从加拿大的 17 个中心招募的。每位受试者在使用支气管扩张剂前后都接受了肺活量测试,以确定他们是否符合慢性阻塞性肺病、哮喘、肺活量保留比值受损(PRISm)的诊断标准,或肺活量结果是否正常。采用随机数字拨号法同样招募了年龄匹配的对照组(231 人)。采用慢性阻塞性肺病评估测试和圣乔治呼吸问卷中的问题,得出 0-100 分的呼吸困难影响评估分数:与未确诊的哮喘患者(n=265,平均分 56.6,95% CI:53.9-59.3)或未确诊的慢性阻塞性肺病患者(n=330,平均分 57.5,95% CI:55.1-59.9)相比,PRISm 患者(n=172)报告的呼吸困难影响(平均分 63.0,95% CI:59.5-66.4)更大。与对照组相比,所有组别均报告有明显影响的呼吸困难(平均得分 13.8,95% CI:11.8-15.7)。包括年龄、性别、体重指数、吸烟和合并症在内的受试者特异性风险因素解释了 20.6% 的呼吸困难变异。疾病分类解释了另外 12.4% 的变异,肺活量测定评估的肺功能损伤严重程度解释了另外 1.7% 的变异。在对年龄、性别和体重指数进行调整后,更大的呼吸困难影响与医疗保健使用率增加、生活质量下降和工作效率降低有关:在社区未确诊呼吸道症状的成年人中,PRISm 患者呼吸困难的影响最大。呼吸困难给医疗系统带来了负担,并与生活质量和工作效率受损有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
期刊最新文献
Identifying abnormal exertional breathlessness in COPD: comparing mMRC and CAT with CPET. Passive Expiration from Total Lung Capacity Can Estimate Expiratory Function in Infants: A retrospective study. Patterns and Differences in Lung Cancer Treatment - United States, 2015-2020. Prophylactic antibiotics in adults with acute brain injury who are invasively ventilated in the Intensive Care Unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis. An End-of-Life Ethics Consult in the ICU: Who Has the Final Say- The Patient or the Family?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1