Antidementia and Psychotropic Drug Use in Older People with Dementia in Australia: A National Data Linkage Study

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Medical Directors Association Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105237
{"title":"Antidementia and Psychotropic Drug Use in Older People with Dementia in Australia: A National Data Linkage Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To estimate the national prevalence of antidementia and psychotropic medication use, and sociodemographic factors associated with their use, in Australians living with dementia.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting and participants</h3><p>Nationwide data linkage study using 2021 Census and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) data. All people aged 65 or older with dementia (self-reported in the Census or dispensed an antidementia drug subsidized by the PBS) were included.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Medication use was defined as at least 1 dispensing during the 3-month period following the Census (August–October 2021). Prevalence of antidementia and psychotropic medication use, including antipsychotics, benzodiazepines and Z-drugs, antiepileptics, opioids, and psychostimulants, was calculated. Sociodemographic factors associated with medication use were explored using multivariable logistic regression models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 177,809 older people living with dementia included, 58.6% were using at least 1 psychotropic medication. Antidepressants were the most commonly used psychotropics (41%), followed by opioids (20%) and antipsychotics (13%). Antidementia medications were used by a quarter of people with dementia (26%).</p><p>People with dementia living in the highest socioeconomic area were more likely to use antidementia medications [adjusted odds ratio (OR), 1.22; 95% CI, 1.17–1.28] and less likely to use psychotropics (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.88–0.95) compared with people living in the lowest socioeconomic area. Conversely, those living in inner regional areas were more likely to use psychotropics (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03–1.10) and less likely to use antidementia medications (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.77–0.82) compared with people living in metropolitan areas.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><p>Psychotropics were commonly used in people with dementia in Australia. Disparities in access to health care due to socioeconomic status or remoteness may have influenced the use of antidementia and psychotropic medications. Further strategies to allow more equitable access to resources and medications are needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861024006595","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To estimate the national prevalence of antidementia and psychotropic medication use, and sociodemographic factors associated with their use, in Australians living with dementia.

Design

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

Setting and participants

Nationwide data linkage study using 2021 Census and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) data. All people aged 65 or older with dementia (self-reported in the Census or dispensed an antidementia drug subsidized by the PBS) were included.

Methods

Medication use was defined as at least 1 dispensing during the 3-month period following the Census (August–October 2021). Prevalence of antidementia and psychotropic medication use, including antipsychotics, benzodiazepines and Z-drugs, antiepileptics, opioids, and psychostimulants, was calculated. Sociodemographic factors associated with medication use were explored using multivariable logistic regression models.

Results

Of the 177,809 older people living with dementia included, 58.6% were using at least 1 psychotropic medication. Antidepressants were the most commonly used psychotropics (41%), followed by opioids (20%) and antipsychotics (13%). Antidementia medications were used by a quarter of people with dementia (26%).

People with dementia living in the highest socioeconomic area were more likely to use antidementia medications [adjusted odds ratio (OR), 1.22; 95% CI, 1.17–1.28] and less likely to use psychotropics (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.88–0.95) compared with people living in the lowest socioeconomic area. Conversely, those living in inner regional areas were more likely to use psychotropics (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03–1.10) and less likely to use antidementia medications (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.77–0.82) compared with people living in metropolitan areas.

Conclusions and Implications

Psychotropics were commonly used in people with dementia in Australia. Disparities in access to health care due to socioeconomic status or remoteness may have influenced the use of antidementia and psychotropic medications. Further strategies to allow more equitable access to resources and medications are needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚老年痴呆症患者的抗痴呆药物和精神药物使用情况:全国数据链接研究》。
目标:估算澳大利亚全国痴呆症患者使用抗痴呆药物和精神药物的比例,以及与使用这些药物相关的社会人口因素:估计澳大利亚全国痴呆症患者使用抗痴呆药物和精神药物的情况,以及与使用这些药物相关的社会人口因素:设计:回顾性横断面研究:利用 2021 年人口普查和药品福利计划 (PBS) 数据进行全国范围的数据链接研究。所有年龄在 65 岁或以上的痴呆症患者(在人口普查中自我报告或配发了由 PBS 补贴的抗痴呆症药物)均被纳入研究范围:在人口普查后的 3 个月内(2021 年 8 月至 10 月)至少配药 1 次即为用药。计算抗痴呆药物和精神药物(包括抗精神病药物、苯二氮卓类药物和 Z 类药物、抗癫痫药物、阿片类药物和精神兴奋剂)的使用率。使用多变量逻辑回归模型探讨了与药物使用相关的社会人口学因素:结果:在纳入的 177 809 名老年痴呆症患者中,58.6% 至少使用一种精神药物。抗抑郁药是最常用的精神药物(41%),其次是阿片类药物(20%)和抗精神病药物(13%)。四分之一的痴呆症患者使用抗痴呆药物(26%)。与生活在社会经济水平最低地区的痴呆患者相比,生活在社会经济水平最高地区的痴呆患者更有可能使用抗痴呆药物(几率比 [OR],1.22;95% CI,1.17-1.28),而使用精神药物的几率则较低(OR,0.91;95% CI,0.88-0.95)。相反,与生活在大都市地区的人相比,生活在内陆地区的人使用精神药物的可能性更大(OR,1.06;95% CI,1.03-1.10),而使用抗痴呆药物的可能性较小(OR,0.79;95% CI,0.77-0.82):澳大利亚痴呆症患者普遍使用精神药物。由于社会经济地位或地理位置偏远,在获得医疗服务方面存在差异,这可能会影响抗痴呆药物和精神药物的使用。有必要制定进一步的策略,使人们能够更公平地获得资源和药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
期刊最新文献
Higher Magnesium Intake Is Associated With a Lower Risk of Frailty in Older Adults. Emerging Digital Technologies Used for Fall Detection in Older Adults in Aged Care: A Scoping Review. Association Between Time Since Smoking Cessation and Frailty Trajectory Among Community-Dwelling Older People: English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. ORIENT Diet: A Potential Neuroprotective Dietary Pattern for Chinese Stroke High-Risk Population. Designing LTC Physical Work Environments to Support Worker Well-being: A Review and Recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1