Objective: To describe and compare the factors that impact initial rehabilitation type after hip fracture surgery.
Design: Retrospective population-based cohort study.
Setting and participants: People aged between 50 and 105 with a hip fracture who had a surgical repair in Ontario, Canada, between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2021.
Methods: Descriptive statistics and a multinomial logistic regression model were used to identify factors associated with initial rehabilitation type.
Results: In this study, 63,401 individuals were included with a mean age of 80 years (standard deviation [SD] 10.9), mostly female (67.3%), with 86.3% living in urban areas at the time of hospitalization and most (72.6%) admitted from the community without home care. A total of 24.5% of individuals did not receive any form of rehabilitation. Rurality of residence decreased the odds of having an initial rehabilitation type in complex continuing care (odds ratio [OR], 0.23; 95% CI, 0.21-0.26), in inpatient rehabilitation (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.24-0.28), or in community rehabilitation (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.50-0.58) compared with no rehabilitation. Dementia decreased the odds of having an initial rehabilitation type in complex continuing care (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.81), in inpatient rehabilitation (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.41-0.47), or in community rehabilitation (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82-0.95) compared with receiving no rehabilitation. Previous history of fragility fracture decreased the odds of having an initial rehabilitation type in either complex continuing care (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.27-0.34), in inpatient rehabilitation (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.24-0.29), or in community rehabilitation (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.30-0.37) compared with no rehabilitation.
Conclusions and implications: Rurality of residence, dementia, and previous history of fragility fractures reduced the odds of receiving specialized inpatient rehabilitation and increased the odds of receiving no rehabilitation. Future research should focus on achieving more equitable care for individuals living in rural settings, with dementia, or with previous fragility fractures to enhance the quality of care and achieve best outcomes for the overall hip fracture population.
Objectives: Clinical decisions to continue or discontinue long-term opioid therapy (LTOT; ≥3 months) for older cancer survivors remain challenging due to limited evidence on the risks and benefits of this treatment practice. This study aims to examine the associations of discontinuing LTOT with clinical and opioid-related adverse event (ORAE) outcomes among older cancer survivors residing in long-term care (LTC) settings.
Designs: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the 100% Medicare nursing home sample from 2010 to 2021.
Setting and participants: LTC residents aged ≥65 years who were survivors of cancer for at least 1 year and received LTOT for chronic pain.
Methods: Discontinuation of LTOT was defined as no prescription opioid refills for at least 90 days. Clinical outcomes included worsening pain, physical function, and depression; ORAE outcomes included counts of pain-related hospitalizations, pain-related emergency department visits, opioid use disorder, and opioid overdose. We used modified Poisson models for clinical outcomes and Poisson models for ORAE outcomes, adjusting baseline covariates via inverse probability of treatment weighting.
Results: Of 21,861 episodes of cancer survivors with LTOT, 18,984 survivors (86.8%) continued LTOT, whereas 2877 survivors (13.2%) discontinued LTOT. The discontinuers vs continuers had lower adjusted risk of worsening pain (relative risk 0.65, 95% CI 0.59-0.74, P < .001) and lower adjusted rates of opioid use disorder (rate ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.90, P < .001) and opioid overdose (rate ratio 0.33, 95% CI 0.21-0.52, P < .001) at the 1-year follow-up, with no difference in physical function and depressive symptoms or rates of pain-related hospitalizations and emergency department visits.
Conclusions and implications: Discontinuing vs continuing LTOT was associated with lower risk of worsening pain, opioid use disorder, and opioid overdose, with nondifferential risks of the other studied outcomes. Discontinuing vs continuing LTOT may confer benefits that outweigh risks among older LTC cancer survivors.
Objectives: To use quantitative and qualitative data to assess nursing home administrators' perceptions of a program using personal care attendants (PCAs) to ease staffing challenges, and to better understand factors concerning perceptions of success of lack thereof.
Design: Convergent mixed methods design, in which quantitative and qualitative data were collected concurrently and analyzed separately, with results combined for interpretation.
Setting and participants: Florida nursing home administrators (N = 74).
Methods: We developed a survey to collect data on administrators' use and perceptions of the PCA program. Data from closed-end questions assessing the value and use of PCAs and data on nursing home characteristics (eg, bed size, profit status) were analyzed using multiple logistic regression. Open-ended responses were analyzed using deductive thematic analysis. Quantitative and qualitative data were combined for further analysis.
Results: We found greater use of PCAs (more PCAs hired) was associated with 6% greater odds of finding the program beneficial (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.0-1.12; P = .049), controlling for facility characteristics. Qualitative analysis identified 3 themes: benefits of the PCA program, barriers to the success of the program, and steps taken to improve the program's usefulness. In further analysis, we identified an overarching theme of administrator proactivity in the implementation of the PCA program. Integration of quantitative and qualitative results found a relationship between assessing the PCA program as beneficial and taking proactive steps to facilitate use of PCAs.
Conclusions and implications: Success of the PCA program in easing staffing challenges may have depended on administrators being proactive, in contrast to those who negatively assessed the program and took a more passive approach. Results provide evidence of differing leadership styles in the use of the PCA program, suggesting leadership training could better equip nursing home leaders to implement staffing initiatives. More research is recommended on the relationship between administrative leadership, staffing, and quality.
Objectives: Nursing home (NH) residents are high-cost, high-need Medicare beneficiaries. Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) have the potential to improve quality of care and reduce potentially unnecessary health care utilization. This study aimed to assess the impact of Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) ACOs on health care utilization among long-stay NH residents.
Design: "Intention-to-treat" and quasi-experimental design.
Setting and participants: A national cohort of 158,259 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries who were long-stay NH residents in 2011 or 2018. In each year, residents were included in the sample the first time their Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (ie, index MDS) met the following inclusion criteria: (1) age 66+; (2) dependence in 2 or more activities of daily living; (3) neither enrolled in hospice nor in coma; and (4) NH length of stay ≥90 days.
Methods: We followed residents' health care utilization and Medicare expenditures for 1 year after their index MDS date. Outcomes included any health care utilization in different care settings (ie, inpatient, outpatient emergency room visit/observational stay, skilled nursing facility, hospice) and corresponding Medicare expenditures. We used difference-in-differences models to estimate the association between ACO attribution and health care utilization in 2018, using 2011 as the pre-ACO baseline. To determine ACO attribution among the 2011 cohort, we developed an algorithm to replicate the ACO attribution in 2018 and used it to identify residents who would have been attributed to 2018 ACOs back in 2011. To address the endogeneity issue between ACO attribution and utilization outcomes, we used an "intention-to-treat" design to determine ACO attribution.
Results: Adjusted difference-in-differences results showed a lack of significant associations between ACO attribution and health care utilization or Medicare expenditures among long-stay NH residents.
Conclusions and implications: ACOs did not affect health care utilization of long-stay NH residents. Future payment reforms need to ensure that their benefits could reach these vulnerable older adults.