Evaluation of adherence of Candida albicans to differently manufactured acrylic resin denture base materials.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.07.040
William Emory Linder, Wendy Auclair Clark, Roland Arnold, Ingeborg De Kok, David A Felton
{"title":"Evaluation of adherence of Candida albicans to differently manufactured acrylic resin denture base materials.","authors":"William Emory Linder, Wendy Auclair Clark, Roland Arnold, Ingeborg De Kok, David A Felton","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.07.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Though computer-aided design and computer-aided manufactured (CAD-CAM) denture bases have become popular, evidence on the ability of C. albicans cells to adhere to these denture bases is lacking.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the adherence of Candida albicans to differently manufactured acrylic resin denture bases.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Acrylic resin disks were fabricated using a total of 6 different fabrication methods (compression molding, injection molding, CAD-CAM milling, and rapid prototyping on 3 different printers with 3 different resins). Each material was evaluated for adherence of C. albicans using 2 different experimental methods - suspension in inoculated tryptic soy broth (TSB) or placed onto a uniform lawn of C. albicans on tryptone soya agar (TSA) with 5% sheep's blood. Attached cells were quantified by spiral plating and then used to re-inoculate sterile plates. Logarithmic transformation was completed to normalize data. For the broth suspension, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to identify any differences between the 6 specimen types in terms of recovery, and the Dunn test was used for post hoc analysis. For the microbial lawn experiment, 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and then the Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) post hoc test were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant differences were found between the numbers of adherent cells based on manufacturing method and between experimental designs (P<.05). All resins demonstrated growth with re-inoculation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Though statistical significance was noted, neither experimental technique demonstrated what is likely a clinically significant preferential binding to any particular resin surface. Attached Candida cells are effective carriers of pathogens to uninfected surfaces. Further studies are indicated for potential virulence factors and differences in printed resins.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.07.040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem: Though computer-aided design and computer-aided manufactured (CAD-CAM) denture bases have become popular, evidence on the ability of C. albicans cells to adhere to these denture bases is lacking.

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the adherence of Candida albicans to differently manufactured acrylic resin denture bases.

Material and methods: Acrylic resin disks were fabricated using a total of 6 different fabrication methods (compression molding, injection molding, CAD-CAM milling, and rapid prototyping on 3 different printers with 3 different resins). Each material was evaluated for adherence of C. albicans using 2 different experimental methods - suspension in inoculated tryptic soy broth (TSB) or placed onto a uniform lawn of C. albicans on tryptone soya agar (TSA) with 5% sheep's blood. Attached cells were quantified by spiral plating and then used to re-inoculate sterile plates. Logarithmic transformation was completed to normalize data. For the broth suspension, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to identify any differences between the 6 specimen types in terms of recovery, and the Dunn test was used for post hoc analysis. For the microbial lawn experiment, 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and then the Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) post hoc test were used.

Results: Statistically significant differences were found between the numbers of adherent cells based on manufacturing method and between experimental designs (P<.05). All resins demonstrated growth with re-inoculation.

Conclusions: Though statistical significance was noted, neither experimental technique demonstrated what is likely a clinically significant preferential binding to any particular resin surface. Attached Candida cells are effective carriers of pathogens to uninfected surfaces. Further studies are indicated for potential virulence factors and differences in printed resins.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估白色念珠菌对不同制造工艺的丙烯酸树脂义齿基托材料的粘附性。
问题陈述:尽管计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM)义齿基托已变得很流行,但仍缺乏有关白色念珠菌细胞粘附在这些义齿基托上的能力的证据。目的:本体外研究的目的是评估白色念珠菌粘附在不同制造方法的丙烯酸树脂义齿基托上的能力:使用总共 6 种不同的制造方法(压缩成型、注射成型、CAD-CAM 铣削和使用 3 种不同树脂在 3 种不同打印机上快速成型)制造丙烯酸树脂盘。使用 2 种不同的实验方法对每种材料的白僵菌粘附性进行了评估--悬浮在接种的胰蛋白酶大豆肉汤(TSB)中,或放置在含有 5% 羊血的胰蛋白胨大豆琼脂(TSA)上的白僵菌均匀草坪上。附着的细胞通过螺旋培养进行定量,然后用于重新接种无菌平板。对数据进行对数转换,使之标准化。对于肉汤悬浮液,使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验来确定 6 种标本在回收率方面的差异,并使用 Dunn 检验进行事后分析。在微生物草坪实验中,采用了单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和 Tukey 诚实差异(HSD)事后检验:结果:根据生产方法和实验设计,粘附细胞数量之间存在统计学意义上的显著差异(PC 结论):尽管统计学意义显著,但两种实验技术都没有显示出任何特定树脂表面可能具有临床意义的优先结合性。附着的念珠菌细胞是未感染表面病原体的有效载体。需要进一步研究潜在的致病因素和印刷树脂的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
期刊最新文献
A method for decontaminating a dental implant and components after abutment screw loosening: A clinical report. Effect of machining method and margin design on the accuracy and margin quality of monolithic zirconia crowns. A digital workflow for recording implant positions and jaw relation for implant-supported complete arch prostheses. Annual review of selected scientific literature: A report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry. Prosthodontic rehabilitation of a patient after mucormycosis using a digitally fabricated hollow complete denture with 3D printed intramucosal inserts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1