Impact of Cardiorespiratory Fitness on COVID-19–Related Outcomes: The Exercise Testing and Health Outcomes Study (ETHOS)

IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Mayo Clinic proceedings Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.mayocp.2024.07.004
Jonathan Myers PhD , Peter Kokkinos PhD , Cristina Cadenas-Sanchez PhD , Angelike Liappis MD , Carl J. Lavie MD , Navjit K. Goraya MD , Amy Weintrob MD , Andreas Pittaras MD , Alexandros Ladas MD , Michael Heimall MS , Charles Faselis MD
{"title":"Impact of Cardiorespiratory Fitness on COVID-19–Related Outcomes: The Exercise Testing and Health Outcomes Study (ETHOS)","authors":"Jonathan Myers PhD ,&nbsp;Peter Kokkinos PhD ,&nbsp;Cristina Cadenas-Sanchez PhD ,&nbsp;Angelike Liappis MD ,&nbsp;Carl J. Lavie MD ,&nbsp;Navjit K. Goraya MD ,&nbsp;Amy Weintrob MD ,&nbsp;Andreas Pittaras MD ,&nbsp;Alexandros Ladas MD ,&nbsp;Michael Heimall MS ,&nbsp;Charles Faselis MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocp.2024.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the association between cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and COVID-19–related health outcomes including mortality, hospitalization, and mechanical ventilation.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><div>In a retrospective analysis of 750,302 patients included in the Exercise Testing and Health Outcomes Study, we identified 23,140 who had a positive result on COVID-19 testing between March 2020 and September 2021 and underwent a maximal exercise test in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System between October 1, 1999 to September 3, 2020. The association between CRF and risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes, including mortality, hospitalization due to COVID-19, and need for intubation was assessed after adjustment for 15 covariates. Patients were stratified into 5 age-specific CRF categories (Least-Fit, Low-Fit, Moderate-Fit, Fit, and High-Fit), based on peak metabolic equivalents achieved.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During a median of follow-up of 100 days, 1643 of the 23,140 patients (7.1%) died, 4995 (21.6%) were hospitalized, and 927 (4.0%) required intubation for COVID-19–related reasons. When compared with the Least-Fit patients (referent), the Low-Fit, Moderate-Fit, Fit, and High-Fit patients had hazard ratios for mortality of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.93), 0.73 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.86), 0.61 (95% CI, 0.53 to 0.72), and 0.54 (95% CI, 0.45 to 0.65), respectively. Patients who were more fit also had substantially lower need for hospital admissions and intubation. Similar patterns were observed for elderly patients and subgroups with comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease; for each of these conditions, those in the High-Fit category had mortality rates that were roughly half those in the Low-Fit category.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Among patients positive for COVID-19, higher CRF had a favorable impact on survival, need for hospitalization, and need for intubation regardless of age, body mass index, or the presence of comorbidities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18334,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings","volume":"99 11","pages":"Pages 1744-1755"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025619624003471","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess the association between cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and COVID-19–related health outcomes including mortality, hospitalization, and mechanical ventilation.

Patients and Methods

In a retrospective analysis of 750,302 patients included in the Exercise Testing and Health Outcomes Study, we identified 23,140 who had a positive result on COVID-19 testing between March 2020 and September 2021 and underwent a maximal exercise test in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System between October 1, 1999 to September 3, 2020. The association between CRF and risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes, including mortality, hospitalization due to COVID-19, and need for intubation was assessed after adjustment for 15 covariates. Patients were stratified into 5 age-specific CRF categories (Least-Fit, Low-Fit, Moderate-Fit, Fit, and High-Fit), based on peak metabolic equivalents achieved.

Results

During a median of follow-up of 100 days, 1643 of the 23,140 patients (7.1%) died, 4995 (21.6%) were hospitalized, and 927 (4.0%) required intubation for COVID-19–related reasons. When compared with the Least-Fit patients (referent), the Low-Fit, Moderate-Fit, Fit, and High-Fit patients had hazard ratios for mortality of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.93), 0.73 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.86), 0.61 (95% CI, 0.53 to 0.72), and 0.54 (95% CI, 0.45 to 0.65), respectively. Patients who were more fit also had substantially lower need for hospital admissions and intubation. Similar patterns were observed for elderly patients and subgroups with comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease; for each of these conditions, those in the High-Fit category had mortality rates that were roughly half those in the Low-Fit category.

Conclusion

Among patients positive for COVID-19, higher CRF had a favorable impact on survival, need for hospitalization, and need for intubation regardless of age, body mass index, or the presence of comorbidities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心肺功能对 COVID-19 相关结果的影响:运动测试与健康结果研究》(ETHOS)。
目的评估心肺功能(CRF)与COVID-19相关健康结果(包括死亡率、住院和机械通气)之间的关系:在对运动测试与健康结果研究(Exercise Testing and Health Outcomes Study)中的 750,302 名患者进行的回顾性分析中,我们确定了 23,140 名在 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 9 月期间 COVID-19 测试结果呈阳性,且在 1999 年 10 月 1 日至 2020 年 9 月 3 日期间在退伍军人事务医疗保健系统中接受了最大运动测试的患者。在对 15 个协变量进行调整后,评估了 CRF 与 COVID-19 严重后果(包括死亡率、COVID-19 导致的住院治疗和插管需求)风险之间的关系。根据达到的峰值代谢当量,将患者分为5个特定年龄的CRF类别(最低适合度、低适合度、中等适合度、适合度和高适合度):在中位 100 天的随访期间,23140 名患者中有 1643 人(7.1%)死亡,4995 人(21.6%)住院,927 人(4.0%)因 COVID-19 相关原因需要插管。与最不适合患者(参照者)相比,低度适合、中度适合、适合和高度适合患者的死亡率危险比分别为 0.82(95% CI,0.72 至 0.93)、0.73(95% CI,0.63 至 0.86)、0.61(95% CI,0.53 至 0.72)和 0.54(95% CI,0.45 至 0.65)。体质较好的患者入院和插管的需求也大大降低。老年患者和患有高血压、糖尿病、心血管疾病和慢性肾病等合并症的亚组也观察到类似的模式;在上述每种情况下,高体能组患者的死亡率约为低体能组患者的一半:结论:在 COVID-19 检测呈阳性的患者中,无论年龄、体重指数或是否存在合并症,较高的 CRF 对生存率、住院需求和插管需求均有有利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings
Mayo Clinic proceedings 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
1.10%
发文量
383
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Mayo Clinic Proceedings is a premier peer-reviewed clinical journal in general medicine. Sponsored by Mayo Clinic, it is one of the most widely read and highly cited scientific publications for physicians. Since 1926, Mayo Clinic Proceedings has continuously published articles that focus on clinical medicine and support the professional and educational needs of its readers. The journal welcomes submissions from authors worldwide and includes Nobel-prize-winning research in its content. With an Impact Factor of 8.9, Mayo Clinic Proceedings is ranked #20 out of 167 journals in the Medicine, General and Internal category, placing it in the top 12% of these journals. It invites manuscripts on clinical and laboratory medicine, health care policy and economics, medical education and ethics, and related topics.
期刊最新文献
Sex-Associated Differences in Clinical Outcomes After Septal Reduction Therapies in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Agreement of Doppler Flow Velocity Reserve With PET Flow Reserve in Patients With Angina Without Obstructive Coronary Arteries. Women Consume Less Oxygen Than Men for Muscular Work: Role of Lean Body Mass. Cutaneous Clear Cell Hidradenoma. Post-Pulmonary Embolism Syndrome-A Diagnostic Dilemma and Challenging Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1