Improving Pain Management in the Intensive Care Unit by Assessment.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pain Management Nursing Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2024.06.013
Reidun K N M Sandvik, Maida Mujakic, Ingvild Haarklau, Gosselin Emilie, Asgjerd L Moi
{"title":"Improving Pain Management in the Intensive Care Unit by Assessment.","authors":"Reidun K N M Sandvik, Maida Mujakic, Ingvild Haarklau, Gosselin Emilie, Asgjerd L Moi","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.06.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients in the intensive care unit suffer from pain caused by life-threatening illness or injury but also treatments such as surgery and nursing procedures such as venipuncture. Unconsciousness following head trauma or sedation stage complicates self-report, and both under- and over-management of pain can occur. Inadequate assessment and treatment might follow from unsuitable pain assessment practices. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the implementation of a pain assessment tool on nurses` documentation of pain and the administration of analgesia and sedation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Quantitative pre-post design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted at one intensive care unit at a university hospital and involved 60 patient records and 30 pre-implementations and 30 post-implementations of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After implementation, a 38% adherence rate was found. The frequency of nurses' pain evaluations increased significantly from 1.3 to 2.3 per nursing shift. The implementation of CPOT also improved how often nurses identified pain by use of facial expressions, muscle tension, and cooperation with the mechanical ventilator, whereas focus on vital signs dropped (p = .014). A larger proportion of patients (17%) received paracetamol after the CPOT implementation compared with before (8%). Findings were statistically significant at p < .01.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of CPOT increased the frequency of pain evaluations, and the observable patient behavior was more often interpreted as pain-related. Nurses' adherence rate to sustained patient behavior focus being modest highlights the essential need for ongoing improvements in practice. Implementation of a new tool must be followed by non-pharmacological and pharmacological pain management steps.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Implementing the CPOT as a pain assessment tool has the potential to enhance assessment practices. However, it is important to note that simply increasing assessment frequency does not guarantee nursing interventions to alleviate pain. This indicates the need for additional steps to be taken in order for nurses to complete the pain assessment cycle and effectively address interventions and reassessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.06.013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Patients in the intensive care unit suffer from pain caused by life-threatening illness or injury but also treatments such as surgery and nursing procedures such as venipuncture. Unconsciousness following head trauma or sedation stage complicates self-report, and both under- and over-management of pain can occur. Inadequate assessment and treatment might follow from unsuitable pain assessment practices. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the implementation of a pain assessment tool on nurses` documentation of pain and the administration of analgesia and sedation.

Design: Quantitative pre-post design.

Methods: The study was conducted at one intensive care unit at a university hospital and involved 60 patient records and 30 pre-implementations and 30 post-implementations of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT).

Results: After implementation, a 38% adherence rate was found. The frequency of nurses' pain evaluations increased significantly from 1.3 to 2.3 per nursing shift. The implementation of CPOT also improved how often nurses identified pain by use of facial expressions, muscle tension, and cooperation with the mechanical ventilator, whereas focus on vital signs dropped (p = .014). A larger proportion of patients (17%) received paracetamol after the CPOT implementation compared with before (8%). Findings were statistically significant at p < .01.

Conclusions: Implementation of CPOT increased the frequency of pain evaluations, and the observable patient behavior was more often interpreted as pain-related. Nurses' adherence rate to sustained patient behavior focus being modest highlights the essential need for ongoing improvements in practice. Implementation of a new tool must be followed by non-pharmacological and pharmacological pain management steps.

Clinical implications: Implementing the CPOT as a pain assessment tool has the potential to enhance assessment practices. However, it is important to note that simply increasing assessment frequency does not guarantee nursing interventions to alleviate pain. This indicates the need for additional steps to be taken in order for nurses to complete the pain assessment cycle and effectively address interventions and reassessments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过评估改善重症监护室的疼痛管理。
目的:重症监护室的病人会因危及生命的疾病或受伤而感到疼痛,也会因手术等治疗和静脉穿刺等护理程序而感到疼痛。头部外伤或镇静阶段后的昏迷使自我报告变得复杂,疼痛管理不足和过度都有可能发生。不适当的疼痛评估方法可能会导致不适当的评估和治疗。本研究旨在评估疼痛评估工具的实施对护士记录疼痛及实施镇痛和镇静的影响:设计:定量前-后设计:研究在一所大学医院的重症监护病房进行,涉及 60 份病历和 30 份重症监护疼痛观察工具(CPOT)实施前和实施后的病历:结果发现,实施后的依从率为 38%。护士进行疼痛评估的频率从每班 1.3 次大幅增加到 2.3 次。CPOT 的实施还提高了护士通过面部表情、肌肉紧张度和与机械呼吸机的配合来识别疼痛的频率,而对生命体征的关注则有所下降(p = .014)。与实施 CPOT 之前(8%)相比,实施 CPOT 之后有更大比例的患者(17%)服用了扑热息痛。研究结果具有统计学意义,P < .01:结论:CPOT 的实施增加了疼痛评估的频率,可观察到的患者行为更多地被解释为与疼痛有关。护士对持续关注患者行为的坚持率不高,这凸显了在实践中不断改进的必要性。新工具的实施必须遵循非药物和药物疼痛管理步骤:临床意义:采用 CPOT 作为疼痛评估工具有可能改进评估实践。然而,需要注意的是,仅仅增加评估频率并不能保证护理干预措施能缓解疼痛。这表明护士需要采取更多的步骤来完成疼痛评估周期,并有效地进行干预和重新评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
期刊最新文献
Examining Preliminary Efficacy of a Qigong Intervention in Veterans with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. Effect of a Self-Efficacy-Promoting Program on Pain Management Among Patients with Cancer: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Concept Analysis of Moral Distress in Pain Management. Patient Experience of Pain Management Following Cardiac Surgery: A Mixed Methods Study. Disparities, Inequities, and Injustices in Populations With Pain: An ASPMN Position Statement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1