Exploring Differences in Four Types of Online Activities Across Individuals with and without Problematic Smartphone Use.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatric Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1007/s11126-024-10090-x
Mehdi Akbari, Mohammad Seydavi, Sonay Sheikhi, Paul J Wright
{"title":"Exploring Differences in Four Types of Online Activities Across Individuals with and without Problematic Smartphone Use.","authors":"Mehdi Akbari, Mohammad Seydavi, Sonay Sheikhi, Paul J Wright","doi":"10.1007/s11126-024-10090-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies on problematic online activities commonly focus on one type of online activity, such as social media. However, individuals often use their Smartphones for more than one online activity. This study examined four types of online activities (social networking, gaming, information acquisition, and short-form video viewing). Based on a combinatory assessment of problematic smartphone use and hours spent online, two groups were created from a larger sample (N = 642): a problematic smartphone user group (PSU; N = 230; F = 72%; Age = 24.99 ± 6.60) and a non-problematic smart phone user group (NPSU; N = 87; F = 62%; Age = 30.49 ± 10.22). As compared to the NPSU group, the PSU group engaged in more social networking, gaming, information acquisition, and short-form video seeing. The PSU group also scored higher on psychological distress, sleep disturbance, fear of missing out, metacognitions about Smartphone use (MSU), desire thinking (DT), and lower on satisfaction with life and cognitive reappraisal. Regression analyses were employed to probe correlates of each online activity among the PSU and NPSU groups. The findings are discussed in light of the metacognitive model of addictive behaviors and future directions are provided concerning the challenges of distinguishing individuals for problematic Internet-related behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":20658,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":"579-597"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-024-10090-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies on problematic online activities commonly focus on one type of online activity, such as social media. However, individuals often use their Smartphones for more than one online activity. This study examined four types of online activities (social networking, gaming, information acquisition, and short-form video viewing). Based on a combinatory assessment of problematic smartphone use and hours spent online, two groups were created from a larger sample (N = 642): a problematic smartphone user group (PSU; N = 230; F = 72%; Age = 24.99 ± 6.60) and a non-problematic smart phone user group (NPSU; N = 87; F = 62%; Age = 30.49 ± 10.22). As compared to the NPSU group, the PSU group engaged in more social networking, gaming, information acquisition, and short-form video seeing. The PSU group also scored higher on psychological distress, sleep disturbance, fear of missing out, metacognitions about Smartphone use (MSU), desire thinking (DT), and lower on satisfaction with life and cognitive reappraisal. Regression analyses were employed to probe correlates of each online activity among the PSU and NPSU groups. The findings are discussed in light of the metacognitive model of addictive behaviors and future directions are provided concerning the challenges of distinguishing individuals for problematic Internet-related behaviors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索有问题和无问题使用智能手机的个人在四类在线活动中的差异。
有关问题在线活动的研究通常只关注一种在线活动,如社交媒体。然而,个人经常使用智能手机进行不止一种在线活动。本研究考察了四种类型的在线活动(社交网络、游戏、信息获取和短视频观看)。根据对问题智能手机使用情况和上网时长的综合评估,从一个较大的样本(N = 642)中创建了两组:问题智能手机用户组(PSU;N = 230;F = 72%;年龄 = 24.99 ± 6.60)和非问题智能手机用户组(NPSU;N = 87;F = 62%;年龄 = 30.49 ± 10.22)。与 NPSU 组相比,PSU 组参与了更多的社交网络、游戏、信息获取和短视频观看。PSU 组在心理困扰、睡眠障碍、害怕错过、对智能手机使用的元认知(MSU)和欲望思维(DT)方面得分较高,而在生活满意度和认知再评价方面得分较低。我们采用回归分析来探究 PSU 组和 NPSU 组中每种在线活动的相关性。根据成瘾行为的元认知模型对研究结果进行了讨论,并就区分个人有问题的互联网相关行为所面临的挑战提供了未来的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatric Quarterly
Psychiatric Quarterly PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Quarterly publishes original research, theoretical papers, and review articles on the assessment, treatment, and rehabilitation of persons with psychiatric disabilities, with emphasis on care provided in public, community, and private institutional settings such as hospitals, schools, and correctional facilities. Qualitative and quantitative studies concerning the social, clinical, administrative, legal, political, and ethical aspects of mental health care fall within the scope of the journal. Content areas include, but are not limited to, evidence-based practice in prevention, diagnosis, and management of psychiatric disorders; interface of psychiatry with primary and specialty medicine; disparities of access and outcomes in health care service delivery; and socio-cultural and cross-cultural aspects of mental health and wellness, including mental health literacy. 5 Year Impact Factor: 1.023 (2007) Section ''Psychiatry'': Rank 70 out of 82
期刊最新文献
Social Media Use, Emotional Investment, Self-Control Failure, and Addiction in Relation to Mental and Sleep Health in Hispanic University Emerging Adults. Barriers to Seeking Psychological Help among First-Year Medical Students: A Cross- Sectional Study from Turkey. Covid-19 Anxiety Scale (CAS): A Validity and Reliability Study. Evaluating the Link between Visual Attention Bias and Emotion Dysregulation of Young Children. The Bergen-Yale Sexual Addiction Scale (BYSAS): Longitudinal Measurement Invariance Across a Two-Year Interval.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1