Investigation of cryptic JAG1 splice variants as a cause of Alagille syndrome and performance evaluation of splice predictor tools.

IF 3.3 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY HGG Advances Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1016/j.xhgg.2024.100351
Ernest Keefer-Jacques, Nicolette Valente, Anastasia M Jacko, Grace Matwijec, Apsara Reese, Aarna Tekriwal, Kathleen M Loomes, Nancy B Spinner, Melissa A Gilbert
{"title":"Investigation of cryptic JAG1 splice variants as a cause of Alagille syndrome and performance evaluation of splice predictor tools.","authors":"Ernest Keefer-Jacques, Nicolette Valente, Anastasia M Jacko, Grace Matwijec, Apsara Reese, Aarna Tekriwal, Kathleen M Loomes, Nancy B Spinner, Melissa A Gilbert","doi":"10.1016/j.xhgg.2024.100351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Haploinsufficiency of JAG1 is the primary cause of Alagille syndrome (ALGS), a rare, multisystem disorder. The identification of JAG1 intronic variants outside of the canonical splice region as well as missense variants, both of which lead to uncertain associations with disease, confuses diagnostics. Strategies to determine if these variants affect splicing include the study of patient RNA or minigene constructs, which are not always available or can be laborious to design, as well as the utilization of computational splice prediction tools. These tools, including Splice AI and Pangolin, use algorithms to calculate the probability that a variant results in a splice alteration, expressed as a Δ score, with higher Δ scores (>0.2 on a 0 to 1 scale) positively correlated with aberrant splicing. We studied the consequence of 10 putative splice variants in ALGS patient samples through RNA analysis and compared this to SpliceAI and Pangolin predictions. We identified eight variants with aberrant splicing, seven of which had not been previously validated. Combining this data with non-canonical and missense splice variants reported in the literature, we identified a predictive threshold for SpliceAI and Pangolin with high sensitivity (Δ score >0.6). Moreover, we show reduced specificity for variants with low Δ scores (<0.2), highlighting a limitation of these tools that results in the misidentification of true splice variants. These results improve genomic diagnostics for ALGS by confirming splice effects for seven variants and suggest that integration of splice prediction tools with RNA analysis is important to ensure accurate clinical variant classifications.</p>","PeriodicalId":34530,"journal":{"name":"HGG Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HGG Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xhgg.2024.100351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Haploinsufficiency of JAG1 is the primary cause of Alagille syndrome (ALGS), a rare, multisystem disorder. The identification of JAG1 intronic variants outside of the canonical splice region as well as missense variants, both of which lead to uncertain associations with disease, confuses diagnostics. Strategies to determine if these variants affect splicing include the study of patient RNA or minigene constructs, which are not always available or can be laborious to design, as well as the utilization of computational splice prediction tools. These tools, including Splice AI and Pangolin, use algorithms to calculate the probability that a variant results in a splice alteration, expressed as a Δ score, with higher Δ scores (>0.2 on a 0 to 1 scale) positively correlated with aberrant splicing. We studied the consequence of 10 putative splice variants in ALGS patient samples through RNA analysis and compared this to SpliceAI and Pangolin predictions. We identified eight variants with aberrant splicing, seven of which had not been previously validated. Combining this data with non-canonical and missense splice variants reported in the literature, we identified a predictive threshold for SpliceAI and Pangolin with high sensitivity (Δ score >0.6). Moreover, we show reduced specificity for variants with low Δ scores (<0.2), highlighting a limitation of these tools that results in the misidentification of true splice variants. These results improve genomic diagnostics for ALGS by confirming splice effects for seven variants and suggest that integration of splice prediction tools with RNA analysis is important to ensure accurate clinical variant classifications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为阿拉吉尔综合征病因的隐性 JAG1 剪接变体的调查以及剪接预测工具的性能评估。
JAG1单倍体缺陷是阿拉吉尔综合征(ALGS)的主要病因,这是一种罕见的多系统疾病。JAG1 内含子变异位于规范剪接区之外,而错义变异与疾病的关系也不确定,这两种变异的发现给诊断带来了困惑。确定这些变异是否会影响剪接的策略包括研究患者的 RNA 或迷你基因构建体(这些构建体并不总是可用或设计起来很费力),以及利用计算剪接预测工具。这些工具(包括 Splice AI 和 Pangolin)使用算法计算变异导致剪接改变的概率,用 Δ 分数表示,较高的Δ 分数(在 0 到 1 的范围内大于 0.2)与异常剪接正相关。我们通过 RNA 分析研究了 ALGS 患者样本中 10 个假定剪接变体的后果,并将其与 SpliceAI 和 Pangolin 预测进行了比较。我们发现了 8 个剪接异常的变体,其中 7 个以前未经验证。将这些数据与文献中报道的非规范和错义剪接变异相结合,我们确定了 SpliceAI 和 Pangolin 的高灵敏度预测阈值(Δ 得分大于 0.6)。此外,我们还发现低 Δ 分值变异的特异性较低 (
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
HGG Advances
HGG Advances Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
69
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Joint genotype and ancestry analysis identify novel loci associated with atopic dermatitis in African American population. Investigation of cryptic JAG1 splice variants as a cause of Alagille syndrome and performance evaluation of splice predictor tools. Dominantly acting variants in vacuolar ATPase subunits impair lysosomal/autophagolysosome function causing a multisystemic disorder with neurocognitive impairment and multiple congenital anomalies. Extensive co-regulation of neighbouring genes complicates the use of eQTLs in target gene prioritisation. Enhancing Personalized Gene Expression Prediction From DNA Sequences Using Genomic Foundation Models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1