Real-world performance of a single-use, analyser-free, molecular point-of-care test for COVID-19 used in the emergency department: Results of a prospective trial (ED-POC)

IF 14.3 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Infection Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106264
{"title":"Real-world performance of a single-use, analyser-free, molecular point-of-care test for COVID-19 used in the emergency department: Results of a prospective trial (ED-POC)","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A novel single-use, analyser-free, molecular point-of-care test for SARS-CoV-2 (Veros COVID-19 test, Sherlock Biosciences) could reduce time to results and improve patient care and flow in the emergency department (ED), but its performance in this setting is unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Adults aged ≥18 years presenting to Southampton General Hospital (UK) with suspected COVID-19 were tested with the Veros COVID-19 test in addition to standard of care near-patient PCR. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated for the Veros COVID-19 test stratified by Ct value. Discrepant results underwent viral culture.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Between Jan 16 and May 2, 2023, 400 patients were enrolled with a median (IQR) age of 60 (34−77) and 141 (35·3%) were SARS-CoV-2 positive by PCR. The Veros test gave valid results on the first test in 384 (96·0%), and sensitivity and specificity were 127/141 (90·1%, 95%CI 83·9–94·5) and 258/259 (99·6%, 95%CI 97·9–100) overall. For those with high or moderate viral load (Ct ≤30), sensitivity was 125/129 (96·9%, 95%CI 92·3–99·2). One (7·1%) of 14 PCR positive/Veros test negative samples was culture positive. Median (IQR) time from sample collection to result was 19 (18−20) mins with the Veros test versus 73 (59−92) mins with PCR (p &lt; 0·0001).</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>The Veros COVID-19 test generated results in near real-time, around 1 h sooner than rapid, near-patient, analyser-based PCR, and accuracy was excellent for samples with moderate and high viral loads. The Veros test represents a step-change in molecular diagnostics for infection and could significantly reduce time to results and improve patient management in EDs and other settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445324001981/pdfft?md5=0fade4443d05eaeb8067a4edf39e5a40&pid=1-s2.0-S0163445324001981-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445324001981","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

A novel single-use, analyser-free, molecular point-of-care test for SARS-CoV-2 (Veros COVID-19 test, Sherlock Biosciences) could reduce time to results and improve patient care and flow in the emergency department (ED), but its performance in this setting is unknown.

Methods

Adults aged ≥18 years presenting to Southampton General Hospital (UK) with suspected COVID-19 were tested with the Veros COVID-19 test in addition to standard of care near-patient PCR. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated for the Veros COVID-19 test stratified by Ct value. Discrepant results underwent viral culture.

Findings

Between Jan 16 and May 2, 2023, 400 patients were enrolled with a median (IQR) age of 60 (34−77) and 141 (35·3%) were SARS-CoV-2 positive by PCR. The Veros test gave valid results on the first test in 384 (96·0%), and sensitivity and specificity were 127/141 (90·1%, 95%CI 83·9–94·5) and 258/259 (99·6%, 95%CI 97·9–100) overall. For those with high or moderate viral load (Ct ≤30), sensitivity was 125/129 (96·9%, 95%CI 92·3–99·2). One (7·1%) of 14 PCR positive/Veros test negative samples was culture positive. Median (IQR) time from sample collection to result was 19 (18−20) mins with the Veros test versus 73 (59−92) mins with PCR (p < 0·0001).

Interpretation

The Veros COVID-19 test generated results in near real-time, around 1 h sooner than rapid, near-patient, analyser-based PCR, and accuracy was excellent for samples with moderate and high viral loads. The Veros test represents a step-change in molecular diagnostics for infection and could significantly reduce time to results and improve patient management in EDs and other settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科使用的一次性、无分析仪、COVID-19分子床旁检验的实际性能:前瞻性试验(ED-POC)的结果。
背景:一种新型的一次性、无需分析仪的SARS-CoV-2分子床旁检测试剂盒(Veros COVID-19检测试剂盒,Sherlock Biosciences公司)可以缩短检测结果产生的时间,改善急诊科(ED)的病人护理和流程,但其在这种情况下的性能尚不清楚:方法:在英国南安普顿综合医院就诊的≥18 岁疑似 COVID-19 的成人除了接受标准的就近病人 PCR 检测外,还接受了 Veros COVID-19 检测。根据 Ct 值分层计算了 Veros COVID-19 检验的诊断准确度。对结果不明确者进行病毒培养:2023年1月16日至5月2日期间,400名患者入组,中位(IQR)年龄为60(34-77)岁,141人(35-3%)PCR检测结果为SARS-CoV-2阳性。384 人(96-0%)在第一次检测时就得到了有效的 Veros 检测结果,总体敏感性和特异性分别为 127/141(90-1%,95%CI 83-9-94-5)和 258/259(99-6%,95%CI 97-9-100)。对于高或中度病毒载量(Ct ≤30)的患者,灵敏度为 125/129(96-9%,95%CI 92-3-99-2)。14 份 PCR 阳性/Veros 检测阴性样本中有 1 份(7-1%)培养阳性。从样本采集到检测结果的时间中位数(IQR)为:Veros 检测 19 (18-20) 分钟,PCR 检测 73 (59-92) 分钟(p解释:Veros COVID-19 检测从样本采集到检测结果的时间中位数(IQR)为 19 (18-20) 分钟,PCR 检测 73 (59-92) 分钟:Veros COVID-19 检验结果几乎是实时生成的,比基于分析仪的快速、接近病人的 PCR 早约 1 小时,而且对于中度和高度病毒载量样本的准确性非常高。Veros检验代表了感染分子诊断的一个进步,可以大大缩短检验结果的产生时间,改善急诊室和其他环境中的病人管理:数据共享:本研究中分析和展示的所有去身份化参与者数据可在发表后向相应作者索取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Infection
Journal of Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
45.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
475
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection publishes original papers on all aspects of infection - clinical, microbiological and epidemiological. The Journal seeks to bring together knowledge from all specialties involved in infection research and clinical practice, and present the best work in the ever-changing field of infection. Each issue brings you Editorials that describe current or controversial topics of interest, high quality Reviews to keep you in touch with the latest developments in specific fields of interest, an Epidemiology section reporting studies in the hospital and the general community, and a lively correspondence section.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Profile of Herpes Zoster-related Hospitalizations and Complications: A French Population-Based Database Study. Genomic analysis confirmed the importation of first mPox Clade Ib case in Kerala, India from Dubai, UAE. Characterization of a novel HIV-1 second-generation circulating recombinant form (CRF172_0755) among men who have sex with men in China. Near real-time severe acute respiratory illness surveillance characterising influenza and COVID-19 epidemiology in hospitalised adults, 2021-22 Global Meningococcal Initiative: Insights on antibiotic resistance, control strategies and advocacy efforts in Western Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1