Using the DRS-8 to measure unresolved/disorganized attachment: Associations with states of mind on the adult attachment interview, psychopathology, and offspring social-emotional development

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Child Abuse & Neglect Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107017
Kristel Mayrand , Tristan Milot , John Briere , Natacha Godbout , Sébastien Oliva-Veilleux , Nicolas Berthelot
{"title":"Using the DRS-8 to measure unresolved/disorganized attachment: Associations with states of mind on the adult attachment interview, psychopathology, and offspring social-emotional development","authors":"Kristel Mayrand ,&nbsp;Tristan Milot ,&nbsp;John Briere ,&nbsp;Natacha Godbout ,&nbsp;Sébastien Oliva-Veilleux ,&nbsp;Nicolas Berthelot","doi":"10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Unresolved/disorganized (U/d) attachment states of mind are associated with poor outcomes across numerous domains of functioning. However, the validity of existing self-report instruments measuring this construct remains questionable.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim of the current study was to validate the DRS-8, an alternative version of the Disorganized Response Scale (DRS), by assessing its construct validity, internal consistency, and criterion validity with the U/d attachment scales on the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI).</p></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><p>Date were collected from 222 expectant parents (78 % women) at T1 and from 67 of them at 12 months postpartum (T2).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants completed the DRS-8 and questionnaires assessing childhood trauma, romantic attachment, and psychological symptoms during pregnancy (T1). Seventy-four of them participated in the AAI at T1. At T2, parents completed a questionnaire assessing their infants' social-emotional development.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The DRS-8 has two highly correlated dimensions, i.e., lapses in the monitoring of reasoning (four items) and discourse (four items). A confirmatory factor analysis supported a bifactor structure of the instrument, showing good fit indices and internal consistency (ω = 0.87). The DRS-8 was significantly correlated with U/d states of mind on the AAI, <em>r</em>(72) = 0.28, <em>p</em> = .016, and demonstrated excellent construct validity. Significant indirect effects of the DRS-8 were found in the associations between childhood trauma and psychological symptoms, and between parental trauma and infant social-emotional development.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The DRS-8 appears to be a promising self-report measure of U/d states of mind showing criterion validity with the AAI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51343,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse & Neglect","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 107017"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213424004071/pdfft?md5=0ac72dce76140a25087a7afb63b5cfa8&pid=1-s2.0-S0145213424004071-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213424004071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Unresolved/disorganized (U/d) attachment states of mind are associated with poor outcomes across numerous domains of functioning. However, the validity of existing self-report instruments measuring this construct remains questionable.

Objectives

The aim of the current study was to validate the DRS-8, an alternative version of the Disorganized Response Scale (DRS), by assessing its construct validity, internal consistency, and criterion validity with the U/d attachment scales on the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI).

Participants and setting

Date were collected from 222 expectant parents (78 % women) at T1 and from 67 of them at 12 months postpartum (T2).

Methods

Participants completed the DRS-8 and questionnaires assessing childhood trauma, romantic attachment, and psychological symptoms during pregnancy (T1). Seventy-four of them participated in the AAI at T1. At T2, parents completed a questionnaire assessing their infants' social-emotional development.

Results

The DRS-8 has two highly correlated dimensions, i.e., lapses in the monitoring of reasoning (four items) and discourse (four items). A confirmatory factor analysis supported a bifactor structure of the instrument, showing good fit indices and internal consistency (ω = 0.87). The DRS-8 was significantly correlated with U/d states of mind on the AAI, r(72) = 0.28, p = .016, and demonstrated excellent construct validity. Significant indirect effects of the DRS-8 were found in the associations between childhood trauma and psychological symptoms, and between parental trauma and infant social-emotional development.

Conclusions

The DRS-8 appears to be a promising self-report measure of U/d states of mind showing criterion validity with the AAI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 DRS-8 测量未解决/混乱的依恋关系:与成人依恋访谈中的心理状态、精神病理学和后代社会情感发展的关联。
背景:未解决/解体(U/d)的依恋心理状态与许多功能领域的不良结果有关。然而,现有的自我报告工具在测量这一结构时的有效性仍然值得怀疑:本研究的目的是通过评估 DRS-8 的构建效度、内部一致性以及与成人依恋访谈(AAI)中 U U/d 依恋量表的标准效度,来验证 DRS--无组织反应量表(DRS)的替代版本:收集了 222 名准父母(78% 为女性)在 T1 和 67 名准父母在产后 12 个月(T2)的数据:受试者在怀孕期间(T1)完成了 DRS-8 和评估童年创伤、恋爱依恋和心理症状的问卷。其中 74 人在 T1 参加了 AAI。在第二阶段,父母填写了一份评估婴儿社会情感发展的问卷:DRS-8有两个高度相关的维度,即推理监测失误(四个项目)和话语监测失误(四个项目)。确认性因素分析支持该工具的双因素结构,显示出良好的拟合指数和内部一致性(ω = 0.87)。DRS-8 与 AAI 中的 U/d 心理状态有明显的相关性,r(72) = 0.28, p = .016,表现出极好的建构效度。在童年创伤与心理症状之间以及父母创伤与婴儿社会情感发展之间,DRS-8 有着明显的间接影响:DRS-8似乎是一种很有前途的U/d心理状态自我报告测量方法,与AAI具有标准效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.40%
发文量
397
期刊介绍: Official Publication of the International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect The International Journal, provides an international, multidisciplinary forum on all aspects of child abuse and neglect, with special emphasis on prevention and treatment; the scope extends further to all those aspects of life which either favor or hinder child development. While contributions will primarily be from the fields of psychology, psychiatry, social work, medicine, nursing, law enforcement, legislature, education, and anthropology, the Journal encourages the concerned lay individual and child-oriented advocate organizations to contribute.
期刊最新文献
Victimization, immigration status, and psychosocial well-being: A representative study among finnish adolescents. Factors associated with decisions to refer possible abusive head trauma to a hospital-based child protection team in Aotearoa New Zealand Predictors of mental health during young people's transition from out-of-home care in Austria The risk and protective factors, response to disclosure, and interventions for sibling sexual abuse: A systematic review. Familial sex trafficking in the United States: A scoping review guided by the Three Ps Framework to end human trafficking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1