An Opioid-Sparing Pain Protocol of Intravenous and Oral Ketorolac Reduces Opioid Consumption and Pain Levels After Arthroscopic Meniscus Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial
John T. Strony M.D. , Sunita Mengers M.D. , Lakshmanan Sivasundaram M.D. , Margaret Sinkler M.D. , Qian Wu B.M. , Chenya Zhao M.S. , Abdus Sattar Ph.D. , Michael J. Salata M.D. , James E. Voos M.D. , Michael R. Karns M.D.
{"title":"An Opioid-Sparing Pain Protocol of Intravenous and Oral Ketorolac Reduces Opioid Consumption and Pain Levels After Arthroscopic Meniscus Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"John T. Strony M.D. , Sunita Mengers M.D. , Lakshmanan Sivasundaram M.D. , Margaret Sinkler M.D. , Qian Wu B.M. , Chenya Zhao M.S. , Abdus Sattar Ph.D. , Michael J. Salata M.D. , James E. Voos M.D. , Michael R. Karns M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To compare ketorolac to oxycodone-acetaminophen with respect to pain and opioid consumption after arthroscopic meniscus surgery. The secondary purpose was to compare short-term functional outcomes between the 2 protocols.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A power analysis demonstrated that 43 patients were required. In this randomized control trial, patients with meniscal pathology undergoing arthroscopic meniscus surgery were included. Group 1 received oxycodone-acetaminophen alone. Group 2 received 1 dose of intravenous ketorolac intraoperatively, oral ketorolac upon discharge, and “rescue” oxycodone-acetaminophen. Patients recorded the number of opioid tablets consumed and visual analog pain scale (VAS) scores 3 times per day for 5 days postoperatively. Opioids were converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). VAS, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were obtained.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-eight patients were randomized. There were 25 patients in the control group and 23 patients in the ketorolac group. The mean (SD) age was 47.9 (14.3) years. Fifty-two percent (n = 25) of the population were female. Three patients (6.3%) underwent meniscal repair. During the first 5 days postoperatively, the mean VAS score (β = –13.2, SE = 5.97, <em>P</em> = .029) and the MMEs consumed were significantly lower (β = –4.7, SE = 1.93, <em>P</em> = .015) per time point in the ketorolac group relative to the control group. The control group had better Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (mean [SD] 80.6 [18.5] vs 65 [21.5], <em>P</em> = .016) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (mean [SD], 74.1 [16.7] vs 61.9 [18.6], <em>P</em> = .029) scores at 6 weeks. There were no significant differences in the rates of side effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>An opioid-sparing pain protocol of intravenous and oral ketorolac is associated with significant reductions in VAS scores and MME consumption in the first 5 days after arthroscopic meniscus surgery. There were significant differences in patient-reported outcomes at final follow-up, favoring the control group. There were no significant differences in adverse reactions and side effects.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level II, prospective randomized controlled trial.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 6","pages":"Pages 1989-2001.e1"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806324006388","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To compare ketorolac to oxycodone-acetaminophen with respect to pain and opioid consumption after arthroscopic meniscus surgery. The secondary purpose was to compare short-term functional outcomes between the 2 protocols.
Methods
A power analysis demonstrated that 43 patients were required. In this randomized control trial, patients with meniscal pathology undergoing arthroscopic meniscus surgery were included. Group 1 received oxycodone-acetaminophen alone. Group 2 received 1 dose of intravenous ketorolac intraoperatively, oral ketorolac upon discharge, and “rescue” oxycodone-acetaminophen. Patients recorded the number of opioid tablets consumed and visual analog pain scale (VAS) scores 3 times per day for 5 days postoperatively. Opioids were converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). VAS, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were obtained.
Results
Forty-eight patients were randomized. There were 25 patients in the control group and 23 patients in the ketorolac group. The mean (SD) age was 47.9 (14.3) years. Fifty-two percent (n = 25) of the population were female. Three patients (6.3%) underwent meniscal repair. During the first 5 days postoperatively, the mean VAS score (β = –13.2, SE = 5.97, P = .029) and the MMEs consumed were significantly lower (β = –4.7, SE = 1.93, P = .015) per time point in the ketorolac group relative to the control group. The control group had better Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (mean [SD] 80.6 [18.5] vs 65 [21.5], P = .016) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (mean [SD], 74.1 [16.7] vs 61.9 [18.6], P = .029) scores at 6 weeks. There were no significant differences in the rates of side effects.
Conclusions
An opioid-sparing pain protocol of intravenous and oral ketorolac is associated with significant reductions in VAS scores and MME consumption in the first 5 days after arthroscopic meniscus surgery. There were significant differences in patient-reported outcomes at final follow-up, favoring the control group. There were no significant differences in adverse reactions and side effects.
Level of Evidence
Level II, prospective randomized controlled trial.
期刊介绍:
Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.