The influence of ageism on the hallmarks of aging: Where age stigma and biology collide

{"title":"The influence of ageism on the hallmarks of aging: Where age stigma and biology collide","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.exger.2024.112575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ageism encompasses the creation of negative stereotypes of aging that culminate in the development of prejudicial thoughts and discriminatory actions against people in advanced age. Stereotypes refer to major characteristics, overgeneralized, not supported by observations, that are created to categorize, simplify, and combine complex characteristics, attributes, and behaviors shared by members of a group into more simplistic categories. Negative aging stereotypes include the assumption that old people are weak, reminiscent, sick, and tired, to quote a few. In early age, these views may generate intergenerational conflicts between young and old people, but they seem to have little effect on other aspects of life. However, in middle-aged and older adults, the presence of negative-self stereotypes of aging are significantly associated with several health parameters, including walking speed, cognitive function, mental health problems, and accumulation of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. Furthermore, observational studies found that ageism might be associated with cardiovascular events, obesity, dementia, and death. These harmful effects are possibly mediated by the interaction between ageism and fundamental mechanisms of aging, mainly inflammation. Given the clinical implications of this relationship, the present manuscript provides a critical review of the available literature that examined associations between ageism and health parameters. We also discuss the main possible mechanisms underlying this association, the main limitations of the current literature, candidate strategies to counteract ageism, and directions to future studies. Finally, we provide a critical opinion of the current scenario and its potential adaptability to the clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94003,"journal":{"name":"Experimental gerontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0531556524002213/pdfft?md5=95bb50e061fbf48d44ce99cc9aeb82e2&pid=1-s2.0-S0531556524002213-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0531556524002213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ageism encompasses the creation of negative stereotypes of aging that culminate in the development of prejudicial thoughts and discriminatory actions against people in advanced age. Stereotypes refer to major characteristics, overgeneralized, not supported by observations, that are created to categorize, simplify, and combine complex characteristics, attributes, and behaviors shared by members of a group into more simplistic categories. Negative aging stereotypes include the assumption that old people are weak, reminiscent, sick, and tired, to quote a few. In early age, these views may generate intergenerational conflicts between young and old people, but they seem to have little effect on other aspects of life. However, in middle-aged and older adults, the presence of negative-self stereotypes of aging are significantly associated with several health parameters, including walking speed, cognitive function, mental health problems, and accumulation of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. Furthermore, observational studies found that ageism might be associated with cardiovascular events, obesity, dementia, and death. These harmful effects are possibly mediated by the interaction between ageism and fundamental mechanisms of aging, mainly inflammation. Given the clinical implications of this relationship, the present manuscript provides a critical review of the available literature that examined associations between ageism and health parameters. We also discuss the main possible mechanisms underlying this association, the main limitations of the current literature, candidate strategies to counteract ageism, and directions to future studies. Finally, we provide a critical opinion of the current scenario and its potential adaptability to the clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年龄歧视对衰老特征的影响:年龄耻辱与生物学的碰撞
老龄歧视包括对老龄化的负面成见,这种成见最终导致对高龄者的偏见思想和歧视行为。刻板印象指的是过度概括的主要特征,没有观察结果的支持,是为了将一个群体成员共有的复杂特征、属性和行为归类、简化和组合成更简单的类别而产生的。消极的老龄化刻板印象包括认为老年人软弱、爱回忆、生病和疲惫等。在年轻时,这些观点可能会引发年轻人和老年人之间的代际冲突,但似乎对生活的其他方面影响不大。然而,在中老年人中,对衰老的负面自我刻板印象与几项健康指标有显著关联,包括行走速度、认知功能、心理健康问题、淀粉样蛋白斑块和神经纤维缠结的积累。此外,观察性研究发现,老龄歧视可能与心血管事件、肥胖、痴呆和死亡有关。这些有害影响可能是由老龄歧视与衰老的基本机制(主要是炎症)之间的相互作用介导的。鉴于这种关系的临床意义,本手稿对研究老龄化与健康参数之间关系的现有文献进行了批判性回顾。我们还讨论了这种情况的主要可能机制、现有文献的主要局限性、应对老龄化的候选策略以及未来研究的方向。最后,我们对目前的情况及其在临床实践中的潜在适应性提出了批判性意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental gerontology
Experimental gerontology Ageing, Biochemistry, Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Sarcopenic obesity and osteoporosis: Research progress and hot spots. Changes in primitive reflexes in older adults and their relationship to mental health indices: An experimental investigation Correlation between blood pressure and mortality in older critically ill patients: Insights from a large intensive care unit database Exploring the impact of lighting sources on walking behavior in obstructed walkways among older adults Association between single-point insulin sensitivity estimator and heart failure in older adults: A cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1