Effects of word presentation during treadmill walking on episodic memory and gait

IF 3.1 2区心理学 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Psychology of Sport and Exercise Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102728

Nathan M. Scott, Daphne Schmid, Phillip D. Tomporowski

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Entrainment emerges when oscillatory movements synchronize with environmental stimuli processing. The purpose of this experiment was to assess how cognitive-motor entrainment during a dual-task would influence the quality of gait and affect episodic long-term memory. Twenty-one participants (22.56 y/o; 64 % F) walked at preferred paces while listening to 40-item word lists. In separate sessions, unique word lists were presented predictably on every fourth stride, unpredictably related to stepping, or predictably while standing. Memory tests administered 24-hr after encoding revealed that predictable word presentation led to better free-recall performance than unpredicted (p = .044); recognition memory was not impacted. Gait phase parameters during the predicted condition were more stable than the unpredicted condition or baseline assessments. Cognitive-motor entrainment may alleviate dual-task costs and enhance memory retention.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

跑步机行走时单词呈现对外显记忆和步态的影响

当振荡运动与环境刺激处理同步时，就会出现同步。本实验的目的是评估在双重任务中，认知与运动的同步如何影响步态的质量并影响外显长期记忆。21 名参与者（22.56 岁/o；64% 女性）一边听着 40 个单词的单词表，一边以自己喜欢的步速行走。在不同的环节中，独特的单词表会在每迈出第四步时出现，或在迈步时出现，或在站立时出现。编码 24 小时后进行的记忆测试表明，可预测的单词呈现比不可预测的单词呈现能带来更好的自由回忆成绩（p = .044）；识别记忆则不受影响。预测条件下的步态相位参数比未预测条件下或基线评估更稳定。认知-运动协调可减轻双重任务成本并增强记忆保持。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Psychology of Sport and Exercise 医学-心理学

CiteScore

6.40

自引率

5.90%

发文量

172

审稿时长

69 days

期刊介绍： Psychology of Sport and Exercise is an international forum for scholarly reports in the psychology of sport and exercise, broadly defined. The journal is open to the use of diverse methodological approaches. Manuscripts that will be considered for publication will present results from high quality empirical research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, commentaries concerning already published PSE papers or topics of general interest for PSE readers, protocol papers for trials, and reports of professional practice (which will need to demonstrate academic rigour and go beyond mere description). The CONSORT guidelines consort-statement need to be followed for protocol papers for trials; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the CONSORT checklist. For meta-analysis, the PRISMA prisma-statement guidelines should be followed; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the PRISMA checklist. For systematic reviews it is recommended that the PRISMA guidelines are followed, although it is not compulsory. Authors interested in submitting replications of published studies need to contact the Editors-in-Chief before they start their replication. We are not interested in manuscripts that aim to test the psychometric properties of an existing scale from English to another language, unless new validation methods are used which address previously unanswered research questions.