Should presurgical psychological evaluations still be a mandated requirement for metabolic and bariatric surgery? A critique of the literature and thoughts on future directions.

Abstract

For more than 30 years, clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative support of patients who undergo metabolic and bariatric surgery have recommended a formal psychological evaluation before surgery. However, the predictive utility of the evaluation in determining future outcomes has been mixed, leading to controversy regarding whether such evaluations should be required for all potential patients. This empirically based commentary will review the utility and value of the psychological evaluation in addition to the limitations in the extant literature that reduce predictive validity and provide recommendations on how to improve quality of the empirical literature and refinements to increase the utility of preoperative evaluations. Pre-metabolic and bariatric surgery psychological evaluation conducted by an appropriately trained clinician and properly reimbursed by the payor that includes time for psychological testing, integration of data, report writing, medical record review, and feedback to the patient and surgical team, should continue to be the standard of care as it benefits all stakeholders.