Are physical activity and everyday mobility independently associated with quality of life at older age?

Jane Elliott , Judith Green
{"title":"Are physical activity and everyday mobility independently associated with quality of life at older age?","authors":"Jane Elliott ,&nbsp;Judith Green","doi":"10.1016/j.ahr.2024.100204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Physical activity and everyday mobility are concepts that overlap but tend to be located in different disciplinary fields. We used the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) to: identify whether physical activity and everyday mobility are separate constructs at younger (60–69) and/or older (&gt;=70) age bands, and for men and women; derive measures of the two constructs from variables in the ELSA; and assess whether they are independently associated with quality of life (QoL).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We derived composite measures for physical activity and everyday mobility from ELSA variables. ‘Physical Activity’ combined items recording directly-measured activity for movement (walk-speed) and self-report measures of physical mobility difficulties and amount of vigorous, moderate and mild physical activity undertaken. ‘Everyday Mobility’ combined self-report responses about activities likely to involve leaving the house. QoL was measured using the ‘CASP-19′ scale. Using Wave 9 of ELSA (data collection in 2018–2020), we used a factor analysis to explore the constructs, and a regression analysis to examine associations with QoL.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The factor analysis confirmed that these were discrete constructs, which explained between them 36% of the variance. This was robust across age bands, and in factor analyses for men and women separately. The regression analysis identified that lower physical activity and everyday mobility are independently associated with lower QoL, when controlling for a range of contextual variables including age.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Findings suggest that a social model of QoL at older age should focus on the broader mobility determinants of QoL as well as individual levels of physical activity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72129,"journal":{"name":"Aging and health research","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667032124000258/pdfft?md5=7f861c845abfba84a8064d01e80b7c6c&pid=1-s2.0-S2667032124000258-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging and health research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667032124000258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Physical activity and everyday mobility are concepts that overlap but tend to be located in different disciplinary fields. We used the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) to: identify whether physical activity and everyday mobility are separate constructs at younger (60–69) and/or older (>=70) age bands, and for men and women; derive measures of the two constructs from variables in the ELSA; and assess whether they are independently associated with quality of life (QoL).

Methods

We derived composite measures for physical activity and everyday mobility from ELSA variables. ‘Physical Activity’ combined items recording directly-measured activity for movement (walk-speed) and self-report measures of physical mobility difficulties and amount of vigorous, moderate and mild physical activity undertaken. ‘Everyday Mobility’ combined self-report responses about activities likely to involve leaving the house. QoL was measured using the ‘CASP-19′ scale. Using Wave 9 of ELSA (data collection in 2018–2020), we used a factor analysis to explore the constructs, and a regression analysis to examine associations with QoL.

Results

The factor analysis confirmed that these were discrete constructs, which explained between them 36% of the variance. This was robust across age bands, and in factor analyses for men and women separately. The regression analysis identified that lower physical activity and everyday mobility are independently associated with lower QoL, when controlling for a range of contextual variables including age.

Conclusions

Findings suggest that a social model of QoL at older age should focus on the broader mobility determinants of QoL as well as individual levels of physical activity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体力活动和日常行动能力与老年人的生活质量是否有独立联系?
背景体力活动和日常行动能力是两个相互重叠的概念,但往往分属不同的学科领域。我们利用英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA):确定在较年轻(60-69 岁)和/或较年长(70 岁)年龄段,以及在男性和女性中,体力活动和日常行动能力是否是两个独立的概念;从 ELSA 的变量中得出这两个概念的测量值;并评估它们是否与生活质量(QoL)独立相关。体力活动 "综合了记录直接测量的运动量(步行速度)的项目和自我报告的身体活动困难程度以及剧烈、中度和轻度体力活动量的项目。日常行动能力 "综合了关于可能需要离开家的活动的自我报告。QoL 采用 "CASP-19 "量表进行测量。利用ELSA第9波(数据收集时间为2018-2020年),我们使用因子分析来探索这些构念,并使用回归分析来研究与QoL的关联。结果因子分析证实这些构念是离散的,它们之间解释了36%的方差。这一结果在不同年龄段以及对男性和女性分别进行的因子分析中都是可靠的。回归分析表明,在控制了包括年龄在内的一系列环境变量后,较低的体力活动和日常活动能力与较低的 QoL 之间存在独立关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aging and health research
Aging and health research Clinical Neurology, Public Health and Health Policy, Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Advancements in TDP-43 research: Towards biomarkers and therapeutic targets for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Synergistic effect of smoking and education on incident dementia among older adults: The Shanghai aging study Promoting digital inclusion through public-private partnerships for older adults in Nigeria: A review Assistance with oral hygiene care among family dementia caregivers in Chinese American Communities in New York City Depressive syndrome, cognitive impairment, and associated factors among community-dwelling aged persons in Cameroon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1