Correlates of public stigma towards prolonged grief disorder

Bettina K. Doering , Judith Gonschor , Lauren J. Breen , Maarten C. Eisma
{"title":"Correlates of public stigma towards prolonged grief disorder","authors":"Bettina K. Doering ,&nbsp;Judith Gonschor ,&nbsp;Lauren J. Breen ,&nbsp;Maarten C. Eisma","doi":"10.1016/j.ejtd.2024.100451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Public stigma for grief may reduce the social support provided to bereaved persons and increase bereavement-related distress. The general public reports more stigmatizing responses towards bereaved persons with prolonged grief disorder (PGD) than towards persons experiencing non-clinical grief. No studies to date have investigated whether personal characteristics of the general public relate to public stigma towards PGD. The present study examined whether participants’ socio-demographic characteristics and personal bereavement experiences are associated with stigmatizing responses towards PGD.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We combined data of three previously published vignette experiments to conduct a secondary analysis. All studies presented members of the general public (<em>N</em> = 452) with a description of a male bereaved person with PGD symptoms and a PGD diagnosis. Participants rated three indicators of public stigma - negative attributes (competence, warmth), emotional reactions (fear, anger), and preferred social distance. First, we examined whether gender, age, and educational level related to public stigma towards PGD. Second, we examined the association of participants’ personal bereavement experiences with public stigma.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Regression analyses demonstrated that participants’ socio-demographic characteristics explained a significant amount of variance for warmth (Δ<em>R²</em> = .03; <em>p</em> &lt; .05) and anger (Δ<em>R²</em> = .05; <em>p</em> &lt; .01): Male participants rated the person in the vignette as less warm (β = -.13, <em>p</em> &lt; .05). Being older related to lower ratings of warmth (β = -.12, <em>p</em> &lt; .05) and higher ratings of anger (β = .18, <em>p</em> &lt; .01). Participants’ educational level was not associated with stigma. Participants’ bereavement experiences explained a significant amount of variance for preferred social distance (Δ<em>R²</em> = .11; <em>p</em> &lt;. 05): Participants reporting higher personal grief severity preferred less social distance from a person with PGD (β = -.29, <em>p</em> &lt; .05). A higher number of experienced losses, the recency of the bereavement, and the cause of death (natural vs. unnatural) did not relate to public stigma.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Male and older persons are more likely to demonstrate public stigma towards PGD. Experiencing severe grief oneself is associated with less preferred social distance from a person with PGD. Anti-stigma interventions may advance the public's knowledge about grief and PGD and address specific target groups (men and older persons).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924000747/pdfft?md5=9a5bc8490dc62070bdcf1e0478baeb0f&pid=1-s2.0-S2468749924000747-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924000747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Public stigma for grief may reduce the social support provided to bereaved persons and increase bereavement-related distress. The general public reports more stigmatizing responses towards bereaved persons with prolonged grief disorder (PGD) than towards persons experiencing non-clinical grief. No studies to date have investigated whether personal characteristics of the general public relate to public stigma towards PGD. The present study examined whether participants’ socio-demographic characteristics and personal bereavement experiences are associated with stigmatizing responses towards PGD.

Method

We combined data of three previously published vignette experiments to conduct a secondary analysis. All studies presented members of the general public (N = 452) with a description of a male bereaved person with PGD symptoms and a PGD diagnosis. Participants rated three indicators of public stigma - negative attributes (competence, warmth), emotional reactions (fear, anger), and preferred social distance. First, we examined whether gender, age, and educational level related to public stigma towards PGD. Second, we examined the association of participants’ personal bereavement experiences with public stigma.

Results

Regression analyses demonstrated that participants’ socio-demographic characteristics explained a significant amount of variance for warmth (Δ = .03; p < .05) and anger (Δ = .05; p < .01): Male participants rated the person in the vignette as less warm (β = -.13, p < .05). Being older related to lower ratings of warmth (β = -.12, p < .05) and higher ratings of anger (β = .18, p < .01). Participants’ educational level was not associated with stigma. Participants’ bereavement experiences explained a significant amount of variance for preferred social distance (Δ = .11; p <. 05): Participants reporting higher personal grief severity preferred less social distance from a person with PGD (β = -.29, p < .05). A higher number of experienced losses, the recency of the bereavement, and the cause of death (natural vs. unnatural) did not relate to public stigma.

Conclusions

Male and older persons are more likely to demonstrate public stigma towards PGD. Experiencing severe grief oneself is associated with less preferred social distance from a person with PGD. Anti-stigma interventions may advance the public's knowledge about grief and PGD and address specific target groups (men and older persons).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公众对长期悲伤障碍的成见的相关因素
背景公众对悲伤的鄙视可能会减少为丧亲者提供的社会支持,并增加与丧亲相关的痛苦。与经历非临床悲伤的人相比,公众对长期悲伤障碍(PGD)丧亲之痛者的鄙视反应更为强烈。迄今为止,尚未有研究调查公众的个人特征是否与公众对长期悲伤障碍的鄙视有关。本研究探讨了参与者的社会人口学特征和个人丧亲经历是否与对 PGD 的鄙视反应有关。所有研究都向公众(N = 452)展示了对一名有 PGD 症状和 PGD 诊断的男性丧亲者的描述。参与者对公众成见的三个指标--负面属性(能力、温暖)、情绪反应(恐惧、愤怒)和偏好的社会距离--进行评分。首先,我们研究了性别、年龄和教育水平是否与公众对 PGD 的成见有关。结果回归分析表明,参与者的社会人口特征解释了温暖(ΔR² = .03;p <;.05)和愤怒(ΔR² = .05;p <;.01)的显著差异:男性参与者对小插图中人物的温暖度评分较低 (β = -.13, p <.05)。年龄越大,对温暖的评价越低(β = -.12,p < .05),对愤怒的评价越高(β = .18,p < .01)。参与者的教育水平与耻辱感无关。受试者的丧亲经历可以显著解释受试者偏好的社会距离(ΔR² = .11; p <.05):报告个人悲伤严重程度较高的参与者更希望与 PGD 患者保持较小的社交距离 (β = -.29, p <.05)。更多的丧亲经历、丧亲时间和死亡原因(自然死亡与非自然死亡)与公众成见无关。男性和老年人更有可能表现出对 PGD 的公众成见。自己经历过严重的悲痛与与 PGD 患者保持较少的社会距离有关。反污名化干预措施可以提高公众对悲伤和 PGD 的认识,并针对特定目标群体(男性和老年人)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of Reconsolidation of Traumatic Memories for Complex PTSD – A pilot quasi-experimental study from a wellness centre in India Adverse childhood experiences and dissociation among Italian public psychology service users Résistance et trauma: introduire l'existence Exploring the interplay between dreams, Early Maladaptive Schemas and demanding parenting style in Malaysia: A qualitative study Parent-Child EMDR therapy for children aged 0–4 years: Protocol, pilot-data, and case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1