Exploring the health and wellbeing landscape at a third level institution

IF 2.4 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Wellbeing Space and Society Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1016/j.wss.2024.100221
{"title":"Exploring the health and wellbeing landscape at a third level institution","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.wss.2024.100221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In line with the Healthy Campus framework, this study explored the health, health literacy, and wellbeing landscape for students at an Irish third level institution using a participatory action research approach with the aim to identify potential need, and inform future health promotion action(s). <strong>Methods.</strong> This mixed-method study involved three phases; (1) a scoping review to audit what activities are currently available to support student health and wellbeing on campus, (2) assessment of students’ current health literacy using the Health Literacy Questionnaire, analysed using Cohen's d to investigate the magnitude of differences between student groups, (3) qualitative discussions with university stakeholders, analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, to provide greater understanding and context to the results of the previous phases. <strong>Results.</strong> The scoping review identified 151 activities on campus to support students’ holistic health, with the majority focused on individual support. Students’ health literacy scores were in line with the broader literature. A number of themes were identified within the qualitative data; i) the need for an ‘opt-in’ approach to support a health-integrated culture, ii) barriers and facilitators to health information, iii) the importance of ‘walking the walk’, iv) the specific university experience of 2022 as society emerged from Covid-19, and v) factors that influence student engagement. <strong>Conclusion.</strong> Insight into the participatory action approach undertaken in this study may be useful to inform other higher education institutions (HEIs) interested in undertaking similar work. Thorough description of the findings may also allow these to be transferred to other contexts. The findings of this study can help inform and direct the current university's, and potentially other HEIs, future actions in regards to enhancing the health and wellbeing of its stakeholders. To foster an authentic ‘Healthy Campus’, a whole-university approach is needed HEIs, supported by open dialogue between stakeholders and senior leadership commitment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52616,"journal":{"name":"Wellbeing Space and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666558124000393/pdfft?md5=ac2e747f7d4b205e90e7d277abb85630&pid=1-s2.0-S2666558124000393-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellbeing Space and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666558124000393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In line with the Healthy Campus framework, this study explored the health, health literacy, and wellbeing landscape for students at an Irish third level institution using a participatory action research approach with the aim to identify potential need, and inform future health promotion action(s). Methods. This mixed-method study involved three phases; (1) a scoping review to audit what activities are currently available to support student health and wellbeing on campus, (2) assessment of students’ current health literacy using the Health Literacy Questionnaire, analysed using Cohen's d to investigate the magnitude of differences between student groups, (3) qualitative discussions with university stakeholders, analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, to provide greater understanding and context to the results of the previous phases. Results. The scoping review identified 151 activities on campus to support students’ holistic health, with the majority focused on individual support. Students’ health literacy scores were in line with the broader literature. A number of themes were identified within the qualitative data; i) the need for an ‘opt-in’ approach to support a health-integrated culture, ii) barriers and facilitators to health information, iii) the importance of ‘walking the walk’, iv) the specific university experience of 2022 as society emerged from Covid-19, and v) factors that influence student engagement. Conclusion. Insight into the participatory action approach undertaken in this study may be useful to inform other higher education institutions (HEIs) interested in undertaking similar work. Thorough description of the findings may also allow these to be transferred to other contexts. The findings of this study can help inform and direct the current university's, and potentially other HEIs, future actions in regards to enhancing the health and wellbeing of its stakeholders. To foster an authentic ‘Healthy Campus’, a whole-university approach is needed HEIs, supported by open dialogue between stakeholders and senior leadership commitment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索三级机构的健康和福祉状况
根据 "健康校园 "框架,本研究采用参与式行动研究方法,探讨了爱尔兰一所三级教育机构学生的健康、健康素养和福祉状况,目的是确定潜在需求,并为未来的健康促进行动提供信息。研究方法。这项混合方法研究包括三个阶段:(1) 范围审查,审核目前有哪些活动可用于支持校园内学生的健康和幸福;(2) 使用健康素养问卷评估学生当前的健康素养,并使用科恩氏 d 进行分析,以调查学生群体之间的差异程度;(3) 与大学利益相关者进行定性讨论,并使用反思性专题分析进行分析,以更好地理解前几个阶段的结果并为其提供背景资料。结果。范围审查确定了校园内 151 项支持学生全面健康的活动,其中大部分活动侧重于个人支持。学生的健康素养得分与更广泛的文献相符。在定性数据中确定了一些主题:i) 需要 "选择加入 "的方法来支持健康综合文化;ii) 获取健康信息的障碍和促进因素;iii) "身体力行 "的重要性;iv) 2022 年的特定大学经历,因为社会从 Covid-19 中浮现出来;v) 影响学生参与的因素。结论。本研究中采用的参与式行动方法可能对其他有意开展类似工作的高等教育机构(HEIs)有所启发。对研究结果的详尽描述也可将其应用于其他情况。本研究的结果有助于指导本大学,甚至其他高等教育机构,在提高利益相关者的健康和福祉方面的未来行动。要培养真正的 "健康校园",高等院校需要采取全校参与的方法,并辅以利益相关者之间的公开对话和高层领导的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wellbeing Space and Society
Wellbeing Space and Society Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
124 days
期刊最新文献
Do perceived natural environment and eco-anxiety relate to mental health and quality of life? Findings from a representative adult sample Exploring the health and wellbeing landscape at a third level institution Migrants as agents in placemaking: A socio-spatial analysis of Basmane area in Izmir, Türkiye Examining the bi-directional temporal associations between perceived age-based discrimination and perceived neighborhood characteristics Effect of a neighbourhood intervention on social cohesion in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1