Sukhjit P. Singh , Chris C. Tanner , James P.S. Sukias , Mark C. Lay , Graeme D.E. Glasgow
{"title":"Multilayer partially saturated vertical flow wetlands for advanced small community wastewater treatment","authors":"Sukhjit P. Singh , Chris C. Tanner , James P.S. Sukias , Mark C. Lay , Graeme D.E. Glasgow","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study evaluated the performance of four types (zeolite, gravel, complete woodchip, and vertical shaft) of pilot-scale partially saturated vertical flow wetlands for treating domestic wastewater. The zeolite-woodchip PSVF design achieved a mean total nitrogen removal of 80 % and also performed best in terms of ammonium-N removal (99 %). The complete woodchip design also achieved a similar mean reduction in TN but by having better nitrate removal. The corresponding changes in alkalinity and nitrogen species measured above and below the unsaturated zones of the PSVF suggest that classical nitrification and denitrification are the main mechanisms involved in nitrogen removal. All four systems achieved >95 % removal for biochemical oxygen demand and total suspended solids. Phosphorus removal was 55 % for zeolite, gravel and vertical shaft, and 37 % for the complete woodchip system. The elimination of <em>E. coli</em> ranged between 1.7 and 2.8 log<sub>10</sub> in all four systems, with the complete woodchip PSVF delivering the highest reduction. PSVF wetlands can provide effluent quality equivalent to multistage hybrid systems while occupying a significantly lower footprint without additional power requirements.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 107390"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002155/pdfft?md5=8a77533bb39c3fc8cc00b313d0153dcd&pid=1-s2.0-S0925857424002155-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002155","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluated the performance of four types (zeolite, gravel, complete woodchip, and vertical shaft) of pilot-scale partially saturated vertical flow wetlands for treating domestic wastewater. The zeolite-woodchip PSVF design achieved a mean total nitrogen removal of 80 % and also performed best in terms of ammonium-N removal (99 %). The complete woodchip design also achieved a similar mean reduction in TN but by having better nitrate removal. The corresponding changes in alkalinity and nitrogen species measured above and below the unsaturated zones of the PSVF suggest that classical nitrification and denitrification are the main mechanisms involved in nitrogen removal. All four systems achieved >95 % removal for biochemical oxygen demand and total suspended solids. Phosphorus removal was 55 % for zeolite, gravel and vertical shaft, and 37 % for the complete woodchip system. The elimination of E. coli ranged between 1.7 and 2.8 log10 in all four systems, with the complete woodchip PSVF delivering the highest reduction. PSVF wetlands can provide effluent quality equivalent to multistage hybrid systems while occupying a significantly lower footprint without additional power requirements.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.