Improving clinical trial enrollment in minority racial and ethnic patients with gynecologic malignancy

IF 1.2 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Gynecologic Oncology Reports Pub Date : 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1016/j.gore.2024.101495
Olivia D. Lara , Kathryn Allen , Amin Yakubov , Bhavana Pothuri
{"title":"Improving clinical trial enrollment in minority racial and ethnic patients with gynecologic malignancy","authors":"Olivia D. Lara ,&nbsp;Kathryn Allen ,&nbsp;Amin Yakubov ,&nbsp;Bhavana Pothuri","doi":"10.1016/j.gore.2024.101495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Racial and ethnic minorities remain underrepresented in clinical trials . Underrepresentation of racial groups leads to the selection of therapeutic interventions that may not be representative of the population expected to use the medicine. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a set of implementation strategies to increase underrepresented patients in gynecologic cancer clinical trials.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An interrupted time series analysis evaluating implementation strategies (pre-screening and fast-track referral) was conducted from January 2021 to May 2022. Descriptive analysis of gynecologic oncology patient screening and accrual was compared before and after intervention implementation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the study period (pre- and post-intervention), 26 patients were screened, and 9 patients enrolled in therapeutic gynecologic cancer clinical trials. Prior to the intervention, 7 patients were screened and 2 patients enrolled onto a clinical trial. Following the intervention, 19 patients were screened and 7 patients enrolled in a cancer clinical trial. Black patients comprised 13 of 19 (68.4%) of patients post-intervention compared to 1 of 7 (14.3 %) of patients screened pre-intervention (p &lt; 0.05). All 7 patients enrolled post intervention were racial and ethnic minorities (non-Hispanic Black [4 of 7] and Hispanic White [3 of 7]) compared to no minority patients enrolled pre-intervention (p &lt; 0.05). Screening increased 2.5-fold for all patients, and 5- fold for minority patients. Clinical trial enrollment increased 3.5-fold following intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A combination of pre-screening and fast-track referral intervention in a racial and ethnically diverse urban academic hospital was associated with a significant increase in minority screening and enrollment. Structured strategies to overcome barriers to underrepresented racial and ethnic patient accrual in academic hospitals are urgently warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12873,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001747/pdfft?md5=5c53edf50b8122566675cc162f0003d1&pid=1-s2.0-S2352578924001747-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Racial and ethnic minorities remain underrepresented in clinical trials . Underrepresentation of racial groups leads to the selection of therapeutic interventions that may not be representative of the population expected to use the medicine. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a set of implementation strategies to increase underrepresented patients in gynecologic cancer clinical trials.

Methods

An interrupted time series analysis evaluating implementation strategies (pre-screening and fast-track referral) was conducted from January 2021 to May 2022. Descriptive analysis of gynecologic oncology patient screening and accrual was compared before and after intervention implementation.

Results

During the study period (pre- and post-intervention), 26 patients were screened, and 9 patients enrolled in therapeutic gynecologic cancer clinical trials. Prior to the intervention, 7 patients were screened and 2 patients enrolled onto a clinical trial. Following the intervention, 19 patients were screened and 7 patients enrolled in a cancer clinical trial. Black patients comprised 13 of 19 (68.4%) of patients post-intervention compared to 1 of 7 (14.3 %) of patients screened pre-intervention (p < 0.05). All 7 patients enrolled post intervention were racial and ethnic minorities (non-Hispanic Black [4 of 7] and Hispanic White [3 of 7]) compared to no minority patients enrolled pre-intervention (p < 0.05). Screening increased 2.5-fold for all patients, and 5- fold for minority patients. Clinical trial enrollment increased 3.5-fold following intervention.

Conclusions

A combination of pre-screening and fast-track referral intervention in a racial and ethnically diverse urban academic hospital was associated with a significant increase in minority screening and enrollment. Structured strategies to overcome barriers to underrepresented racial and ethnic patient accrual in academic hospitals are urgently warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高少数种族和族裔妇科恶性肿瘤患者的临床试验注册率
目的 少数种族和少数民族在临床试验中的代表性仍然不足。种族群体代表性不足导致选择的治疗干预措施可能无法代表预期用药人群。本研究评估了一套实施策略的有效性,以增加妇科癌症临床试验中代表性不足的患者。方法从 2021 年 1 月到 2022 年 5 月,对实施策略(预筛查和快速转诊)进行了间断时间序列分析评估。结果在研究期间(干预前和干预后),26 名患者接受了筛查,9 名患者参加了治疗性妇科癌症临床试验。干预前,7 名患者接受了筛查,2 名患者参加了临床试验。干预后,19 名患者接受了筛查,7 名患者参加了癌症临床试验。干预后,19 名患者中有 13 名(68.4%)是黑人,而干预前,7 名患者中有 1 名(14.3%)是黑人(p < 0.05)。干预后登记的 7 名患者均为少数种族和族裔(非西班牙裔黑人 [7 人中的 4 人] 和西班牙裔白人 [7 人中的 3 人]),而干预前没有登记少数种族患者(p < 0.05)。所有患者的筛查率提高了 2.5 倍,少数民族患者的筛查率提高了 5 倍。结论在一家种族和民族多元化的城市学术医院中,结合预筛查和快速转诊干预措施可显著提高少数民族筛查率和入院率。迫切需要采取结构化策略来克服学术医院中少数种族和民族患者入组的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Gynecologic Oncology Reports OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
183
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Gynecologic Oncology Reports is an online-only, open access journal devoted to the rapid publication of narrative review articles, survey articles, case reports, case series, letters to the editor regarding previously published manuscripts and other short communications in the field of gynecologic oncology. The journal will consider papers that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract, with originality, quality, and clarity the chief criteria of acceptance.
期刊最新文献
When ovarian mature teratoma peritonitis mimics cancer: What is the best treatment? High Rates of Germline Pathogenic Variants in Somali Patients with Ovarian Cancer Sleep characteristics and recurrence in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer survivors: A prospective cohort study Implementation of enhanced recovery protocols in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for metastatic ovarian cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A feasibility study Rehabilitation of pelvic floor dysfunction after radiation therapy for a rare gynecological cancer: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1