Stephen Skett , Tina Patel , Didier Duprez , Sunnia Gupta , Tucker Netherton , Christoph Trauernicht , Sarah Aldridge , David Eaton , Carlos Cardenas , Laurence E. Court , Daniel Smith , Ajay Aggarwal
{"title":"Autocontouring of primary lung lesions and nodal disease for radiotherapy based only on computed tomography images","authors":"Stephen Skett , Tina Patel , Didier Duprez , Sunnia Gupta , Tucker Netherton , Christoph Trauernicht , Sarah Aldridge , David Eaton , Carlos Cardenas , Laurence E. Court , Daniel Smith , Ajay Aggarwal","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>In many clinics, positron-emission tomography is unavailable and clinician time extremely limited. Here we describe a deep-learning model for autocontouring gross disease for patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy for primary lung lesions and/or hilar/mediastinal nodal disease, based only on computed tomography (CT) images.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>An autocontouring model (nnU-Net) was trained to contour gross disease in 379 cases (352 training, 27 test); 11 further test cases from an external centre were also included. Anchor-point-based post-processing was applied to remove extraneous autocontoured regions. The autocontours were evaluated quantitatively in terms of volume similarity (Dice similarity coefficient [DSC], surface Dice coefficient, 95<sup>th</sup> percentile Hausdorff distance [HD95], and mean surface distance), and scored for usability by two consultant oncologists. The magnitude of treatment margin needed to account for geometric discrepancies was also assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The anchor point process successfully removed all erroneous regions from the autocontoured disease, and identified two cases to be excluded from further analysis due to ‘missed’ disease. The average DSC and HD95 were 0.8 ± 0.1 and 10.5 ± 7.3 mm, respectively. A 10-mm uniform margin-distance applied to the autocontoured region was found to yield “full coverage” (sensitivity > 0.99) of the clinical contour for 64 % of cases. Ninety-seven percent of evaluated autocontours were scored by both clinicians as requiring no or minor edits.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our autocontouring model was shown to produce clinically usable disease outlines, based on CT alone, for approximately two-thirds of patients undergoing lung radiotherapy. Further work is necessary to improve this before clinical implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100637"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001076/pdfft?md5=66dee5a039c29412f0b49ae3be06dd45&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624001076-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and purpose
In many clinics, positron-emission tomography is unavailable and clinician time extremely limited. Here we describe a deep-learning model for autocontouring gross disease for patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy for primary lung lesions and/or hilar/mediastinal nodal disease, based only on computed tomography (CT) images.
Materials and methods
An autocontouring model (nnU-Net) was trained to contour gross disease in 379 cases (352 training, 27 test); 11 further test cases from an external centre were also included. Anchor-point-based post-processing was applied to remove extraneous autocontoured regions. The autocontours were evaluated quantitatively in terms of volume similarity (Dice similarity coefficient [DSC], surface Dice coefficient, 95th percentile Hausdorff distance [HD95], and mean surface distance), and scored for usability by two consultant oncologists. The magnitude of treatment margin needed to account for geometric discrepancies was also assessed.
Results
The anchor point process successfully removed all erroneous regions from the autocontoured disease, and identified two cases to be excluded from further analysis due to ‘missed’ disease. The average DSC and HD95 were 0.8 ± 0.1 and 10.5 ± 7.3 mm, respectively. A 10-mm uniform margin-distance applied to the autocontoured region was found to yield “full coverage” (sensitivity > 0.99) of the clinical contour for 64 % of cases. Ninety-seven percent of evaluated autocontours were scored by both clinicians as requiring no or minor edits.
Conclusions
Our autocontouring model was shown to produce clinically usable disease outlines, based on CT alone, for approximately two-thirds of patients undergoing lung radiotherapy. Further work is necessary to improve this before clinical implementation.