Myositis -specific and -associated antibodies in neurological disorders - A retrospective study of 727 patients

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of the Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jns.2024.123213
{"title":"Myositis -specific and -associated antibodies in neurological disorders - A retrospective study of 727 patients","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jns.2024.123213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs) and myositis-associated antibodies (MAAs) are assessed in clinical neurology, serving as a non-invasive tool for the differential diagnosis of autoimmune myopathies. However, the presence of MSAs and MAAs in neurological disorders remains uncertain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective analysis was conducted on 878 serum samples from the neurological laboratory of the University Hospital Tübingen, Germany. The EUROLINE Myositis Profil 3 (IgG) Line Blot was used for antibody evaluation (anti-Mi2, -Ku, -PM-Scl100, -PM-Scl75, -Jo1, -SRP, -PL7, -PL12, -EJ, -OJ, and -Ro52). Samples were categorized into 19 disease groups, with consideration for myositis-linked and non-myositis-linked diseases. Then, the distribution of positive findings and the concurrent presence of more than one MAA/MSA were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 727 included line blots, 84 could be assigned to myositis-linked diseases (thereof 44 positive for MAA/MSA). MAA and MSA taken together were more frequently positive for the main group of myositis-linked disease (52.4 %) compared to the non-myositis-linked group (14.6 %, overall specificity 85.4 %). However, individual antibodies were specific, ranging above 97.5 %. False positive antibody results can also occur in neurological differential diagnoses such as muscle dystrophy or cramp fasciculation syndrome. Furthermore, the concurrent presence of more than one MAA/MSA does not show a significant association with the presence of a myositis-linked disease for antibody-positive samples (<em>p</em> = 0.136).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Testing MSA and MAA simultaneously may not be suitable as a primary screening method for myositis-linked diseases in clinical neurological groups. However, MSAs and MAAs may offer valuable diagnostic support, particularly in cases where myositis is strongly considered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17417,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022510X24003484/pdfft?md5=9801add8618fcbd5da8591212fca52f5&pid=1-s2.0-S0022510X24003484-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022510X24003484","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs) and myositis-associated antibodies (MAAs) are assessed in clinical neurology, serving as a non-invasive tool for the differential diagnosis of autoimmune myopathies. However, the presence of MSAs and MAAs in neurological disorders remains uncertain.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was conducted on 878 serum samples from the neurological laboratory of the University Hospital Tübingen, Germany. The EUROLINE Myositis Profil 3 (IgG) Line Blot was used for antibody evaluation (anti-Mi2, -Ku, -PM-Scl100, -PM-Scl75, -Jo1, -SRP, -PL7, -PL12, -EJ, -OJ, and -Ro52). Samples were categorized into 19 disease groups, with consideration for myositis-linked and non-myositis-linked diseases. Then, the distribution of positive findings and the concurrent presence of more than one MAA/MSA were analyzed.

Results

Among 727 included line blots, 84 could be assigned to myositis-linked diseases (thereof 44 positive for MAA/MSA). MAA and MSA taken together were more frequently positive for the main group of myositis-linked disease (52.4 %) compared to the non-myositis-linked group (14.6 %, overall specificity 85.4 %). However, individual antibodies were specific, ranging above 97.5 %. False positive antibody results can also occur in neurological differential diagnoses such as muscle dystrophy or cramp fasciculation syndrome. Furthermore, the concurrent presence of more than one MAA/MSA does not show a significant association with the presence of a myositis-linked disease for antibody-positive samples (p = 0.136).

Discussion

Testing MSA and MAA simultaneously may not be suitable as a primary screening method for myositis-linked diseases in clinical neurological groups. However, MSAs and MAAs may offer valuable diagnostic support, particularly in cases where myositis is strongly considered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经系统疾病中的肌炎特异性抗体和相关抗体--对 727 名患者的回顾性研究
目的 在临床神经病学中评估肌炎特异性抗体(MSA)和肌炎相关抗体(MAAs),作为鉴别诊断自身免疫性肌病的非侵入性工具。方法对德国图宾根大学医院神经实验室的 878 份血清样本进行了回顾性分析。采用 EUROLINE Myositis Profil 3 (IgG) Line Blot 进行抗体评估(抗 Mi2、-Ku、-PM-Scl100、-PM-Scl75、-Jo1、-SRP、-PL7、-PL12、-EJ、-OJ 和 -Ro52)。考虑到肌炎相关疾病和非肌炎相关疾病,样本被分为 19 个疾病组。结果在纳入的 727 份印迹中,84 份可归入肌炎相关疾病(其中 44 份 MAA/MSA 阳性)。与非肌炎相关组(14.6%,总体特异性为 85.4%)相比,MAA 和 MSA 合在一起对主要肌炎相关疾病组(52.4%)的阳性率更高。不过,单个抗体的特异性高于 97.5%。在神经系统鉴别诊断中也可能出现抗体假阳性结果,如肌肉萎缩症或痉挛集束综合征。此外,在抗体阳性样本中,同时出现一种以上的 MAA/MSA 与肌炎相关疾病并无明显关联(p = 0.136)。然而,MSA和MAA可提供有价值的诊断支持,尤其是在强烈考虑肌炎的病例中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Journal of the Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
313
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Neurological Sciences provides a medium for the prompt publication of original articles in neurology and neuroscience from around the world. JNS places special emphasis on articles that: 1) provide guidance to clinicians around the world (Best Practices, Global Neurology); 2) report cutting-edge science related to neurology (Basic and Translational Sciences); 3) educate readers about relevant and practical clinical outcomes in neurology (Outcomes Research); and 4) summarize or editorialize the current state of the literature (Reviews, Commentaries, and Editorials). JNS accepts most types of manuscripts for consideration including original research papers, short communications, reviews, book reviews, letters to the Editor, opinions and editorials. Topics considered will be from neurology-related fields that are of interest to practicing physicians around the world. Examples include neuromuscular diseases, demyelination, atrophies, dementia, neoplasms, infections, epilepsies, disturbances of consciousness, stroke and cerebral circulation, growth and development, plasticity and intermediary metabolism.
期刊最新文献
Importance of focusing on subjective symptoms to maintain quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease for over 5 years. Bridging transdisciplinary in medical education: A pathway to achieve SDG 3 in Global Health. Response to letter from Catamo, Costa, Buque & Nzwalo (2024) titled "Possible role of mycotoxins, malnutrition and MECP2 dysregulation in nodding syndrome" regarding Spencer, Valdes Angues & Palmer's paper titled "Nodding syndrome: A role for environmental biotoxins that dysregulate MECP2 expression?" JNS. 2024;462:123077. Doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2024.123077. Response to the letter “Acute stroke care inequities: Cross-cultural insights and the need for multi-ethnic research” Possible role of mycotoxins, malnutrition and MECP2 dysregulation in nodding syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1