Predicting the skin friction’s evolution in a forced turbulent channel flow

IF 2.5 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Fluids Pub Date : 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2024.106417
A. Martín-Gil , O. Flores
{"title":"Predicting the skin friction’s evolution in a forced turbulent channel flow","authors":"A. Martín-Gil ,&nbsp;O. Flores","doi":"10.1016/j.compfluid.2024.106417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present paper reports on the ability of neural networks (NN) and linear stochastic estimation (LSE) tools to predict the evolution of skin friction in a minimal turbulent channel (<span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><msub><mrow><mi>e</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>τ</mi></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>165</mn></mrow></math></span>) after applying an actuation near the wall that is localized in space and time. Two different NN architectures are compared, namely multilayer perceptrons (MLP) and convolutional neural networks (CNN). The paper describes the effect that the predictive horizon and the type/size/number of wall-based sensors have on the performance of each estimator. The performance of MLPs and LSEs is very similar, and becomes independent of the sensor’s size when they are smaller than 60 wall units. For sufficiently small sensors, the CNN outperforms MLPs and LSEs, suggesting that CNNs are able incorporate some of the non-linearities of the near-wall cycle in their prediction of the skin friction evolution after the actuation. Indeed, the CNN is the only architecture able to achieve reasonable predictive capabilities using pressure sensors only. The predictive horizon has a strong effect on the predictive capacity of both NN and LSE, with a Pearson correlation coefficient that varies from 0.95 for short times (i.e., of the order of the actuation time) to less than 0.4 for times of the order of an eddy turn-over time. The analysis of the weights and filters in the LSE and NNs show that all estimators are targeting wall-signatures consistent with streaks, which is interpreted as the streak being the most causal feature in the near-wall cycle for the present forcing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":287,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Fluids","volume":"284 ","pages":"Article 106417"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045793024002482/pdfft?md5=b449b04c023d2513dedf9d096fc3327b&pid=1-s2.0-S0045793024002482-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045793024002482","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present paper reports on the ability of neural networks (NN) and linear stochastic estimation (LSE) tools to predict the evolution of skin friction in a minimal turbulent channel (Reτ=165) after applying an actuation near the wall that is localized in space and time. Two different NN architectures are compared, namely multilayer perceptrons (MLP) and convolutional neural networks (CNN). The paper describes the effect that the predictive horizon and the type/size/number of wall-based sensors have on the performance of each estimator. The performance of MLPs and LSEs is very similar, and becomes independent of the sensor’s size when they are smaller than 60 wall units. For sufficiently small sensors, the CNN outperforms MLPs and LSEs, suggesting that CNNs are able incorporate some of the non-linearities of the near-wall cycle in their prediction of the skin friction evolution after the actuation. Indeed, the CNN is the only architecture able to achieve reasonable predictive capabilities using pressure sensors only. The predictive horizon has a strong effect on the predictive capacity of both NN and LSE, with a Pearson correlation coefficient that varies from 0.95 for short times (i.e., of the order of the actuation time) to less than 0.4 for times of the order of an eddy turn-over time. The analysis of the weights and filters in the LSE and NNs show that all estimators are targeting wall-signatures consistent with streaks, which is interpreted as the streak being the most causal feature in the near-wall cycle for the present forcing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测强制湍流通道流中表皮摩擦力的演变
本文报告了神经网络(NN)和线性随机估算(LSE)工具预测最小湍流通道(Reτ=165)中的表皮摩擦力演变的能力,该通道是在空间和时间上定位的壁附近施加激励后形成的。比较了两种不同的神经网络架构,即多层感知器(MLP)和卷积神经网络(CNN)。论文描述了预测范围和基于墙壁的传感器类型/大小/数量对每种估计器性能的影响。MLP 和 LSE 的性能非常相似,当传感器小于 60 个墙面单位时,其性能与传感器的大小无关。对于足够小的传感器,CNN 的性能优于 MLP 和 LSE,这表明 CNN 能够将近壁循环的一些非线性特性纳入其对致动后皮肤摩擦演变的预测中。事实上,CNN 是仅使用压力传感器就能实现合理预测能力的唯一架构。预测范围对 NN 和 LSE 的预测能力有很大影响,其皮尔逊相关系数从短时间(即执行时间数量级)的 0.95 到涡旋翻转时间数量级的小于 0.4 不等。对 LSE 和 NN 中的权重和滤波器进行的分析表明,所有估计器的目标都是与条纹相一致的壁面特征,这可以解释为条纹是目前强迫作用下近壁面周期中最有因果关系的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Fluids
Computers & Fluids 物理-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Fluids is multidisciplinary. The term ''fluid'' is interpreted in the broadest sense. Hydro- and aerodynamics, high-speed and physical gas dynamics, turbulence and flow stability, multiphase flow, rheology, tribology and fluid-structure interaction are all of interest, provided that computer technique plays a significant role in the associated studies or design methodology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Efficient quantum lattice gas automata Energy-consistent discretization of viscous dissipation with application to natural convection flow The numerical analysis of complete and partial electrocoalescence in the droplet-layer system employing the sharp interface technique for multiphase-medium simulation Numerical investigation on the end effects of the flow past a finite rotating circular cylinder with two free ends
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1