Extensive restoration of the entire habitat complex is key to the successful recovery of threatened species: The case of the natterjack toad Epidalea calamita at the northern range margin

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Journal for Nature Conservation Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126707
Riinu Rannap , Kristiina Kübarsepp , Ilona Lepik , Jürgen Rannap
{"title":"Extensive restoration of the entire habitat complex is key to the successful recovery of threatened species: The case of the natterjack toad Epidalea calamita at the northern range margin","authors":"Riinu Rannap ,&nbsp;Kristiina Kübarsepp ,&nbsp;Ilona Lepik ,&nbsp;Jürgen Rannap","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Increasing concerns about biodiversity loss have prompted international efforts to restore degraded habitats. Unfortunately, wildlife habitat restoration often fails due to inadequate planning, inappropriate scale, or lack of providing key elements of habitats. We investigated the effectiveness of habitat restoration of a threatened amphibian species, the natterjack toad <em>Epidalea calamita</em>, in Estonia, comparing two different restoration approaches – partial habitat restoration and extensive habitat restoration over 16 years. Our goal was to investigate the impact of these two different approaches on the populations, to find out which habitat components play a key role in restoration and which measures are of primary importance in the restoration of habitats for small amphibian populations. We used GIS analysis to identify changes in the area of the habitat complex and breeding sites in seven natterjack toad locations following the restoration activities. To assess population response to habitat restoration, we used the census of the natterjack toad egg-strings as a proxy to the population size. The average number of egg-strings increased by 1.2-fold after partial habitat restoration and 3.5-fold when comparing partial habitat restoration with extensive restoration. Partial habitat restoration, which consisted of improving the condition of extant habitat, had no significant effect on population size (number of egg-strings), while extensive habitat restoration, which included improving and enlarging the entire habitat complex (both terrestrial and aquatic habitats as well as migration matrix between these components) led to population growth. The habitat features that positively influenced population growth were the area of entire habitat complex and the number and size of the breeding sites. In terms of habitat restoration and conservation measures, the number of natterjack toad populations was positively affected by restoration of the entire habitat complex (terrestrial habitats and water bodies), which was supplemented by the supportive rearing of tadpoles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 126707"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138124001560","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasing concerns about biodiversity loss have prompted international efforts to restore degraded habitats. Unfortunately, wildlife habitat restoration often fails due to inadequate planning, inappropriate scale, or lack of providing key elements of habitats. We investigated the effectiveness of habitat restoration of a threatened amphibian species, the natterjack toad Epidalea calamita, in Estonia, comparing two different restoration approaches – partial habitat restoration and extensive habitat restoration over 16 years. Our goal was to investigate the impact of these two different approaches on the populations, to find out which habitat components play a key role in restoration and which measures are of primary importance in the restoration of habitats for small amphibian populations. We used GIS analysis to identify changes in the area of the habitat complex and breeding sites in seven natterjack toad locations following the restoration activities. To assess population response to habitat restoration, we used the census of the natterjack toad egg-strings as a proxy to the population size. The average number of egg-strings increased by 1.2-fold after partial habitat restoration and 3.5-fold when comparing partial habitat restoration with extensive restoration. Partial habitat restoration, which consisted of improving the condition of extant habitat, had no significant effect on population size (number of egg-strings), while extensive habitat restoration, which included improving and enlarging the entire habitat complex (both terrestrial and aquatic habitats as well as migration matrix between these components) led to population growth. The habitat features that positively influenced population growth were the area of entire habitat complex and the number and size of the breeding sites. In terms of habitat restoration and conservation measures, the number of natterjack toad populations was positively affected by restoration of the entire habitat complex (terrestrial habitats and water bodies), which was supplemented by the supportive rearing of tadpoles.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
广泛恢复整个栖息地群是受威胁物种成功恢复的关键:北部分布区边缘的滩蟾 Epidalea calamita 案例
对生物多样性丧失的日益关注促使国际社会努力恢复退化的栖息地。遗憾的是,野生动物栖息地恢复工作往往因规划不足、规模不当或缺乏栖息地的关键要素而失败。我们调查了爱沙尼亚一种濒危两栖动物--纳特蟾蜍(Epidalea calamita)的栖息地恢复效果,比较了两种不同的恢复方法--部分栖息地恢复和历时16年的大面积栖息地恢复。我们的目标是研究这两种不同方法对种群的影响,找出哪些生境成分在恢复中发挥了关键作用,以及哪些措施对小型两栖动物种群的生境恢复至关重要。我们利用地理信息系统(GIS)分析,确定了七个纳特蟾蜍栖息地综合体面积和繁殖地在恢复活动后的变化。为了评估种群对栖息地恢复的反应,我们使用了纳特蟾蜍卵串普查作为种群数量的替代指标。部分栖息地恢复后,卵串的平均数量增加了1.2倍,而部分栖息地恢复与大面积恢复相比,卵串的平均数量增加了3.5倍。部分栖息地恢复包括改善现存栖息地的条件,对种群数量(卵串数量)没有显著影响,而大面积栖息地恢复包括改善和扩大整个栖息地群(包括陆生和水生栖息地以及这些组成部分之间的迁移基质),会导致种群数量增长。对种群增长有积极影响的生境特征是整个生境群的面积以及繁殖地的数量和规模。在栖息地恢复和保护措施方面,整个栖息地群(陆地栖息地和水体)的恢复对纳特蟾蜍种群数量产生了积极影响,而蝌蚪的辅助饲养则对种群数量产生了补充影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Nature Conservation
Journal for Nature Conservation 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
7.9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation. Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Corrigendum to “Surviving the Tide: Assessing Guiana dolphin persistence amidst growing threats in a protected estuary in South-eastern Brazil” [J. Nature Conserv. 82 (2024) 126713] From virtue to sin: Is the installation of bat boxes an effective conservation measure or a potential pitfall for vulnerable bat species? Paying for green tide management or participating in cleanup activities? Testing and controlling for payment vehicle bias in the valuation of ecological damage caused by green tides Predicting climate driven habitat shifts for the Egyptian vulture in Punjab, Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1