Adoption of telemedicine for obesity treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic achieved comparable outcomes to in-person visits

{"title":"Adoption of telemedicine for obesity treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic achieved comparable outcomes to in-person visits","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.obpill.2024.100131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, weight loss programs rapidly transitioned to a virtual model, replacing in-person clinic visits. We sought to compare the observed weight loss and adherence to treatment between patients referred for intensive behavioral therapy (IBT) who were treated via telemedicine and those treated in person.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>After IRB approval, we conducted a retrospective observational study of patients referred for clinical bariatric IBT between January 2019 and June 2021 who were followed in person or via telemedicine. The primary endpoint was the percentage of excess BMI loss (EBL%); secondary endpoints included treatment adherence, duration of follow-up, and number of completed visits.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the study period, 139 patients were seen for at least one IBT session for weight management: 62 were followed up in person (IP) and 77 via telemedicine (TM). The mean age, baseline BMI, and follow-up duration between the groups were similar. In the IP and TM groups, the EBL% was −24.7 ± 24.7 and −22.7 ± 19.5 (P = 0.989) and loss to follow-up after the first visit was 27.4% and 19.5% (P = 0.269), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>For the management of obesity, weight loss programs delivered via telemedicine can achieve similar outcomes to those provided via classical in-person visits. This study suggests that the integration of telecare into clinical practice in bariatric medicine should be considered in the future. Emerging technologies may allow adequate patient follow-up in multiple scenarios, specifically non-critical chronic disorders, and bring unanticipated benefits for patients and healthcare providers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100977,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Pillars","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667368124000330/pdfft?md5=97b918584ec1a92f1c1dda3a1ffbb5e7&pid=1-s2.0-S2667368124000330-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Pillars","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667368124000330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

During the COVID-19 pandemic, weight loss programs rapidly transitioned to a virtual model, replacing in-person clinic visits. We sought to compare the observed weight loss and adherence to treatment between patients referred for intensive behavioral therapy (IBT) who were treated via telemedicine and those treated in person.

Methods

After IRB approval, we conducted a retrospective observational study of patients referred for clinical bariatric IBT between January 2019 and June 2021 who were followed in person or via telemedicine. The primary endpoint was the percentage of excess BMI loss (EBL%); secondary endpoints included treatment adherence, duration of follow-up, and number of completed visits.

Results

During the study period, 139 patients were seen for at least one IBT session for weight management: 62 were followed up in person (IP) and 77 via telemedicine (TM). The mean age, baseline BMI, and follow-up duration between the groups were similar. In the IP and TM groups, the EBL% was −24.7 ± 24.7 and −22.7 ± 19.5 (P = 0.989) and loss to follow-up after the first visit was 27.4% and 19.5% (P = 0.269), respectively.

Conclusion

For the management of obesity, weight loss programs delivered via telemedicine can achieve similar outcomes to those provided via classical in-person visits. This study suggests that the integration of telecare into clinical practice in bariatric medicine should be considered in the future. Emerging technologies may allow adequate patient follow-up in multiple scenarios, specifically non-critical chronic disorders, and bring unanticipated benefits for patients and healthcare providers.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,采用远程医疗治疗肥胖症取得了与亲自就诊相当的效果
背景在 COVID-19 大流行期间,减肥项目迅速过渡到虚拟模式,取代了亲诊。我们试图比较通过远程医疗转诊接受强化行为疗法(IBT)治疗的患者与亲自接受治疗的患者之间观察到的体重减轻情况和治疗依从性。方法经 IRB 批准后,我们对 2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月期间转诊接受临床减肥 IBT 的患者进行了一项回顾性观察研究,这些患者接受了亲自或远程医疗随访。主要终点是超重体重指数下降的百分比(EBL%);次要终点包括治疗依从性、随访时间和完成的就诊次数。结果在研究期间,139 名患者至少接受了一次体重管理 IBT 治疗:其中 62 人接受了亲自随访(IP),77 人接受了远程医疗随访(TM)。两组患者的平均年龄、基线体重指数和随访时间相似。在 IP 组和 TM 组中,EBL% 分别为 -24.7 ± 24.7 和 -22.7 ± 19.5(P = 0.989),首次访问后的随访损失分别为 27.4% 和 19.5%(P = 0.269)。这项研究表明,未来应考虑将远程医疗纳入减肥医学的临床实践中。新兴技术可以在多种情况下对患者进行充分的随访,特别是非危重慢性疾病,并为患者和医疗服务提供者带来意想不到的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of in-person versus digital enhanced lifestyle interventions in adults with overweight and obesity Effect of resveratrol supplementation on metabolic risk markers and anthropometric parameters in individuals with obesity or overweight: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Diagnosis and management of metabolic dysfunction- associated steatotic liver disease in South Asians- A clinical review Case report of a female western Indian vegetarian with obesity Retrospective review of seven patients with obesity simultaneously treated with a combination of a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist and a meal replacement product
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1