Biodegradation of (Aminomethyl)phosphonic acid (AMPA) by isolated microbial consortia extracted from biological filters at drinking water treatment plants

IF 3.6 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Current Research in Biotechnology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.crbiot.2024.100248
{"title":"Biodegradation of (Aminomethyl)phosphonic acid (AMPA) by isolated microbial consortia extracted from biological filters at drinking water treatment plants","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.crbiot.2024.100248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The widespread use of glyphosate has significantly increased its presence in drinking water sources. Aminomethylphosphonic Acid (AMPA), a breakdown product of glyphosate, is challenging to remove from water using conventional treatment methods, posing risks to public health and environmental safety. This work investigates the biodegradation of AMPA by bacteria isolated from three environmental sources, with a focus on determining their potential application in water treatment systems. Two samples were collected from granular activated carbon (GAC) filters of different operational durations at a water treatment facility, and one sample was taken from soil that had historically been treated with glyphosate-based herbicides. Bacterial isolates capable of degrading AMPA were identified from these samples through selective enrichment, and kinetic degradation experiments were then conducted to assess their effectiveness. In environmental samples, after 48 hrs AMPA removal was &gt; 70 % using GAC from an active treatment plant and soil samples removed 19 %. After bacterial isolation a consortium was isolated and from these four isolates were identified, comprising three species, including novel AMPA degraders M−S3 and M−SS (<em>Myroides sp</em>. mNGS23), and P-S92 (<em>Pseudochrobactrum saccharolyticum</em>). Within both minimal media supplemented with AMPA and raw untreated showing substrate concentrations above 10 mg/L whilst the specific degradation rates saw a decrease in substrate concentrations above 100 mg/L. AMPA removal occured in pilot scale sand filters augmented with P-S92 but removal was inconsistent. These findings show the potential of using biodegradation as an effective treatment strategy for AMPA removal from water. The identification of AMPA-degrading bacteria offers a promising solution for enhancing the removal of this persistent pollutant from contaminated waters. Further research is recommended to explore the full-scale application of these isolates in water treatment processes. This study contributes to the development of sustainable water treatment technologies by harnessing the natural degradative capacities of environmental bacteria.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52676,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Biotechnology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590262824000741/pdfft?md5=e374ae94461dd0bd9ef172b781e1577e&pid=1-s2.0-S2590262824000741-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590262824000741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The widespread use of glyphosate has significantly increased its presence in drinking water sources. Aminomethylphosphonic Acid (AMPA), a breakdown product of glyphosate, is challenging to remove from water using conventional treatment methods, posing risks to public health and environmental safety. This work investigates the biodegradation of AMPA by bacteria isolated from three environmental sources, with a focus on determining their potential application in water treatment systems. Two samples were collected from granular activated carbon (GAC) filters of different operational durations at a water treatment facility, and one sample was taken from soil that had historically been treated with glyphosate-based herbicides. Bacterial isolates capable of degrading AMPA were identified from these samples through selective enrichment, and kinetic degradation experiments were then conducted to assess their effectiveness. In environmental samples, after 48 hrs AMPA removal was > 70 % using GAC from an active treatment plant and soil samples removed 19 %. After bacterial isolation a consortium was isolated and from these four isolates were identified, comprising three species, including novel AMPA degraders M−S3 and M−SS (Myroides sp. mNGS23), and P-S92 (Pseudochrobactrum saccharolyticum). Within both minimal media supplemented with AMPA and raw untreated showing substrate concentrations above 10 mg/L whilst the specific degradation rates saw a decrease in substrate concentrations above 100 mg/L. AMPA removal occured in pilot scale sand filters augmented with P-S92 but removal was inconsistent. These findings show the potential of using biodegradation as an effective treatment strategy for AMPA removal from water. The identification of AMPA-degrading bacteria offers a promising solution for enhancing the removal of this persistent pollutant from contaminated waters. Further research is recommended to explore the full-scale application of these isolates in water treatment processes. This study contributes to the development of sustainable water treatment technologies by harnessing the natural degradative capacities of environmental bacteria.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从饮用水处理厂生物过滤器中提取的分离微生物群对(氨甲基)膦酸(AMPA)的生物降解
草甘膦的广泛使用大大增加了其在饮用水源中的存在。草甘膦的分解产物氨甲基膦酸(AMPA)很难用传统的处理方法从水中去除,对公众健康和环境安全构成风险。这项研究调查了从三种环境来源中分离出来的细菌对 AMPA 的生物降解情况,重点是确定它们在水处理系统中的潜在应用。其中两个样本取自水处理设施中不同运行时间的颗粒活性炭(GAC)过滤器,一个样本取自曾用草甘膦除草剂处理过的土壤。通过选择性富集,从这些样本中鉴定出了能够降解 AMPA 的细菌分离物,然后进行了动力学降解实验,以评估其有效性。在环境样本中,使用来自活性处理厂的 GAC,48 小时后 AMPA 的去除率为 70%,土壤样本的去除率为 19%。细菌分离后,分离出了一个菌群,并从中鉴定出了四个分离物,包括三个物种,其中有新型 AMPA 降解菌 M-S3 和 M-SS(Myroides sp. mNGS23)以及 P-S92(Pseudochrobactrum saccharolyticum)。在添加了 AMPA 的最小培养基和未经处理的培养基中,底物浓度都超过了 10 毫克/升,而当底物浓度超过 100 毫克/升时,特定的降解率会下降。在添加了 P-S92 的中试规模砂滤器中,AMPA 被去除,但去除率不一致。这些研究结果表明,生物降解是去除水中 AMPA 的一种有效处理策略。AMPA 降解细菌的鉴定为加强去除受污染水体中的这种持久性污染物提供了一种前景广阔的解决方案。建议开展进一步研究,探索这些分离菌在水处理过程中的全面应用。这项研究通过利用环境细菌的天然降解能力,为开发可持续的水处理技术做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Research in Biotechnology
Current Research in Biotechnology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
50
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Current Research in Biotechnology (CRBIOT) is a new primary research, gold open access journal from Elsevier. CRBIOT publishes original papers, reviews, and short communications (including viewpoints and perspectives) resulting from research in biotechnology and biotech-associated disciplines. Current Research in Biotechnology is a peer-reviewed gold open access (OA) journal and upon acceptance all articles are permanently and freely available. It is a companion to the highly regarded review journal Current Opinion in Biotechnology (2018 CiteScore 8.450) and is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals. All CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy-of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach-to ensure they are a widely read resource that is integral to scientists' workflow.
期刊最新文献
Engineering yeast lipids for production of designer biodiesel Table of Contents Dolastatins and their analogues present a compelling landscape of potential natural and synthetic anticancer drug candidates Drug Discovery, Diagnostic, and therapeutic trends on Mpox: A patent landscape Life cycle and environmental impact assessment of vegetation-activated sludge process (V-ASP) for decentralized wastewater treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1