Remanufacturing Strategy of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Under the Constraint of Recycling and Remanufacturing Target: Integrating Carbon Footprint and Social Welfare

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1109/TEM.2024.3433539
Haowei Zhang;Yang Lv;Justin Zuopeng Zhang
{"title":"Remanufacturing Strategy of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Under the Constraint of Recycling and Remanufacturing Target: Integrating Carbon Footprint and Social Welfare","authors":"Haowei Zhang;Yang Lv;Justin Zuopeng Zhang","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2024.3433539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores optimal remanufacturing strategies in a closed-loop supply chain under government-mandated recycling and remanufacturing targets. Two models are proposed: Model O, featuring the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) managing both product streams, and Model T, with a third-party remanufacturer and the OEM in a leadership role. Utilizing the Stackelberg game-theoretic approach through the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) condition, the study reveals that the remanufacturing strategy depends on the unit remanufacturing cost. The cost is divided into two intervals with a distinct strategy based on whether the OEM has remanufacturing capability. In both models, firms exceed recycling and remanufacturing targets in profitable intervals and meet minimum targets in compliance intervals, but with different boundaries. Model O and Model T employ distinct decision-making mechanisms to achieve recycling and remanufacturing targets. Comparative analysis indicates that aggregate supply chain profit in Model T is lower than that in Model O. Social welfare is influenced by the economic impact of carbon emissions; Model O shows higher welfare when the impact is significant, and Model T surpasses it when the impact is insignificant. This study provides insights into effective remanufacturing strategies that consider recycling and remanufacturing targets, unit remanufacturing costs, and the economic impact of carbon emissions.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10613467/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores optimal remanufacturing strategies in a closed-loop supply chain under government-mandated recycling and remanufacturing targets. Two models are proposed: Model O, featuring the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) managing both product streams, and Model T, with a third-party remanufacturer and the OEM in a leadership role. Utilizing the Stackelberg game-theoretic approach through the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) condition, the study reveals that the remanufacturing strategy depends on the unit remanufacturing cost. The cost is divided into two intervals with a distinct strategy based on whether the OEM has remanufacturing capability. In both models, firms exceed recycling and remanufacturing targets in profitable intervals and meet minimum targets in compliance intervals, but with different boundaries. Model O and Model T employ distinct decision-making mechanisms to achieve recycling and remanufacturing targets. Comparative analysis indicates that aggregate supply chain profit in Model T is lower than that in Model O. Social welfare is influenced by the economic impact of carbon emissions; Model O shows higher welfare when the impact is significant, and Model T surpasses it when the impact is insignificant. This study provides insights into effective remanufacturing strategies that consider recycling and remanufacturing targets, unit remanufacturing costs, and the economic impact of carbon emissions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回收与再制造目标约束下的闭环供应链再制造战略:碳足迹与社会福利的整合
本研究探讨了在政府规定的回收和再制造目标下,闭环供应链中的最佳再制造策略。研究提出了两种模式:O 模式,由原始设备制造商(OEM)管理两个产品流;T 模式,由第三方再制造企业和原始设备制造商发挥领导作用。研究通过卡鲁什-库恩-塔克(KKT)条件,利用斯塔克尔伯格博弈理论方法,揭示了再制造战略取决于单位再制造成本。根据原始设备制造商是否具备再制造能力,该成本被分为两个区间,并具有不同的策略。在这两种模式中,企业在盈利区间会超过回收和再制造目标,在合规区间会达到最低目标,但界限不同。O 模式和 T 模式采用不同的决策机制来实现回收和再制造目标。比较分析表明,T 模式的供应链总利润低于 O 模式。社会福利受碳排放的经济影响;当碳排放的经济影响显著时,O 模式的社会福利更高;当碳排放的经济影响不显著时,T 模式的社会福利超过 O 模式。本研究为考虑回收和再制造目标、单位再制造成本以及碳排放的经济影响的有效再制造战略提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
期刊最新文献
Can the Input of Data Elements Improve Manufacturing Productivity? Effect Measurement and Path Analysis Modeling and Simulation Analysis of Influencing Factors of MES Implementation in Zero Defect Management Enterprises in Digital Transformation Editorial: Unveiling the Digital Transformation of Organizations Across Multiple Levels of Analysis Robust Networks, Pivotal Patents: Identifying and Assessing Key Technological Influencers Too Much AI Hype, Too Little Emphasis on Learning? Entrepreneurs Designing Business Models Through Learning-by-Conversing With Generative AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1