Assessing physiological arousal and emotional valence during behavioral intervention for pediatric feeding difficulties: A pilot study

Laura E. Phipps PhD, Walker S. Arce MS, Seth G. Walker PhD, James E. Gehringer PhD
{"title":"Assessing physiological arousal and emotional valence during behavioral intervention for pediatric feeding difficulties: A pilot study","authors":"Laura E. Phipps PhD,&nbsp;Walker S. Arce MS,&nbsp;Seth G. Walker PhD,&nbsp;James E. Gehringer PhD","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study's purpose is to introduce a new measurement system that objectively assesses the social validity of behavioral feeding intervention from the child's perspective via the concurrent measurement of two dimensions of emotion. To date, the primary measures of social validity for behavioral feeding intervention are caregiver treatment acceptability and satisfaction surveys. This is the first study to objectively measure two dimensions of emotion, physiological arousal and emotional valence, while children received behavioral intervention for feeding difficulties. Data collectors used a new open-source data collection software, <i>cometrics</i>, developed to synchronize and record physiological and observational data. Physiological data was collected using a wearable biosensor and observers recorded an index of child happiness, unhappiness, or neither using definitions by Phipps et al. (2022) for six children with a pediatric feeding disorder. Two out of six children needed programmed habituation to the device before data collection. All children assented to wearing the device during data collection. Recorded indices mapped to separable physiological states using electrodermal activity and its constituent components, skin conductance responses and skin conductance level, in addition to skin temperature. Findings demonstrated the feasibility of measuring two dimensions of child emotions during behavioral feeding intervention and revealed that children's physiological responses were distinctly different during intervals scored as happy, unhappy, or neither. This new data collection system has implications for future research on the child's emotional experience of behavioral feeding treatment and increases the possibilities for improving clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"2 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.74","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental health science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhs2.74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study's purpose is to introduce a new measurement system that objectively assesses the social validity of behavioral feeding intervention from the child's perspective via the concurrent measurement of two dimensions of emotion. To date, the primary measures of social validity for behavioral feeding intervention are caregiver treatment acceptability and satisfaction surveys. This is the first study to objectively measure two dimensions of emotion, physiological arousal and emotional valence, while children received behavioral intervention for feeding difficulties. Data collectors used a new open-source data collection software, cometrics, developed to synchronize and record physiological and observational data. Physiological data was collected using a wearable biosensor and observers recorded an index of child happiness, unhappiness, or neither using definitions by Phipps et al. (2022) for six children with a pediatric feeding disorder. Two out of six children needed programmed habituation to the device before data collection. All children assented to wearing the device during data collection. Recorded indices mapped to separable physiological states using electrodermal activity and its constituent components, skin conductance responses and skin conductance level, in addition to skin temperature. Findings demonstrated the feasibility of measuring two dimensions of child emotions during behavioral feeding intervention and revealed that children's physiological responses were distinctly different during intervals scored as happy, unhappy, or neither. This new data collection system has implications for future research on the child's emotional experience of behavioral feeding treatment and increases the possibilities for improving clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估儿科喂养困难行为干预过程中的生理唤醒和情绪情感:试点研究
本研究旨在引入一套新的测量系统,通过同时测量两个维度的情绪,从儿童的角度客观评估行为喂养干预的社会有效性。迄今为止,行为喂养干预社会有效性的主要测量方法是护理人员对治疗的接受度和满意度调查。这是第一项客观测量儿童在接受喂养困难行为干预时的两个情绪维度(生理唤醒和情绪价位)的研究。数据收集人员使用了一种新的开源数据收集软件 cometrics,该软件可同步记录生理数据和观察数据。生理数据通过可穿戴生物传感器收集,观察者则根据菲普斯等人(Phipps et al. 2022)对六名患有小儿喂养障碍的儿童所下的定义,记录儿童的快乐、不快乐或都不快乐的指数。六名儿童中有两名需要在数据收集前通过编程适应该装置。所有儿童都同意在数据收集期间佩戴设备。除皮肤温度外,记录的指数还映射到可分离的生理状态,包括皮肤电活动及其组成成分、皮肤电导反应和皮肤电导水平。研究结果表明,在行为喂养干预过程中测量儿童情绪的两个维度是可行的,并揭示了儿童在快乐、不快乐或两者都不快乐的间歇期的生理反应是截然不同的。这一新的数据收集系统对今后研究儿童在行为喂养治疗中的情绪体验具有重要意义,并增加了改进临床实践的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The simultaneous impact of interventions on optimism and depression: A meta-analysis Social sharing and expressive suppression in major depressive disorder and borderline personality disorder: An experience sampling study Predictors of preoperative anxiety in pediatric surgical patients in Ghana: A bi-center study Using passive and active data to predict posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and cannabis use in recently discharged UK veterans: A protocol for the MAVERICK feasibility study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1