Enhancing Cobot Design Through User Experience Goals: An Investigation of Human–Robot Collaboration in Picking Tasks

IF 4.3 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1155/2024/7058933
Ana Pinto, Inês Duarte, Carla Carvalho, Luís Rocha, Joana Santos
{"title":"Enhancing Cobot Design Through User Experience Goals: An Investigation of Human–Robot Collaboration in Picking Tasks","authors":"Ana Pinto,&nbsp;Inês Duarte,&nbsp;Carla Carvalho,&nbsp;Luís Rocha,&nbsp;Joana Santos","doi":"10.1155/2024/7058933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The use of collaborative robots in industries is growing rapidly. To ensure the successful implementation of these devices, it is essential to consider the user experience (UX) during their design process. This study is aimed at testing the UX goals that emerge when users interact with a collaborative robot during the programming and collaborating phases. A framework on UX goals will be tested, in the geographical context of Portugal. For that, an experimental setup was introduced in the form of a laboratory case study in which the human–robot collaboration (HRC) was evaluated by the combination of both quantitative (applying the User Experience Questionnaire [UEQ]) and qualitative (semistructured interviews) metrics. The sample was constituted by 19 university students. The quantitative approach showed positive overall ratings for the programming phase UX, with attractiveness having the highest average value (<i>M</i> = 2.21; SD = 0.59) and dependability the lowest (<i>M</i> = 1.64; SD = 0.65). For the collaboration phase, all UX ratings were positive, with attractiveness having the highest average value (<i>M</i> = 2.46; SD = 0.78) and efficiency the lowest (<i>M</i> = 1.93; SD = 0.77). Only perspicuity showed significant differences between the two phases (<i>t</i>(18) = −4.335, <i>p</i> = 0.002). The qualitative approach, at the light of the framework used, showed that efficiency, inspiration, and usability are the most mentioned UX goals emerging from the content analysis. These findings enhance manufacturing workers’ well-being by improving cobot design in organizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":36408,"journal":{"name":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/7058933","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/7058933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of collaborative robots in industries is growing rapidly. To ensure the successful implementation of these devices, it is essential to consider the user experience (UX) during their design process. This study is aimed at testing the UX goals that emerge when users interact with a collaborative robot during the programming and collaborating phases. A framework on UX goals will be tested, in the geographical context of Portugal. For that, an experimental setup was introduced in the form of a laboratory case study in which the human–robot collaboration (HRC) was evaluated by the combination of both quantitative (applying the User Experience Questionnaire [UEQ]) and qualitative (semistructured interviews) metrics. The sample was constituted by 19 university students. The quantitative approach showed positive overall ratings for the programming phase UX, with attractiveness having the highest average value (M = 2.21; SD = 0.59) and dependability the lowest (M = 1.64; SD = 0.65). For the collaboration phase, all UX ratings were positive, with attractiveness having the highest average value (M = 2.46; SD = 0.78) and efficiency the lowest (M = 1.93; SD = 0.77). Only perspicuity showed significant differences between the two phases (t(18) = −4.335, p = 0.002). The qualitative approach, at the light of the framework used, showed that efficiency, inspiration, and usability are the most mentioned UX goals emerging from the content analysis. These findings enhance manufacturing workers’ well-being by improving cobot design in organizations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过用户体验目标改进机器人设计:采摘任务中的人机协作研究
协作机器人在各行各业的应用正在迅速增长。为确保这些设备的成功实施,在设计过程中考虑用户体验(UX)至关重要。本研究旨在测试用户在编程和协作阶段与协作机器人交互时产生的用户体验目标。将在葡萄牙的地理环境中测试用户体验目标框架。为此,我们引入了实验室案例研究形式的实验装置,结合定量(应用用户体验问卷[UEQ])和定性(半结构式访谈)指标对人机协作(HRC)进行评估。样本由 19 名大学生组成。定量方法显示,编程阶段的用户体验总体评价良好,吸引力平均值最高(M = 2.21;SD = 0.59),可靠性最低(M = 1.64;SD = 0.65)。在协作阶段,所有用户体验评分都是正面的,吸引力的平均值最高(M = 2.46;SD = 0.78),效率最低(M = 1.93;SD = 0.77)。只有透视性在两个阶段之间存在明显差异(t(18) = -4.335,p = 0.002)。根据所使用的框架,定性方法表明,效率、灵感和可用性是内容分析中提及最多的用户体验目标。这些发现通过改进组织中的 cobot 设计,提高了制造业工人的幸福感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-impact research that enhances understanding of the complex interactions between diverse human behavior and emerging digital technologies.
期刊最新文献
Perceived Value and Purchase Influence of YouTube Beauty Vlog Content Amongst Generation Y Female Consumers Uncovering the Web of Secrets Surrounding Employee Monitoring Software: A Content Analysis of Information Provided by Vendors Industry Readiness and Adaptation of Fourth Industrial Revolution: Applying the Extended TOE Framework The Effect of Children’s Phubbing on Parents’ Psychological Wellbeing: A Moderated Mediation Analysis User Preferences for Medical Digital Transformation: A Case Study of Orthodontic Services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1