The clinical utility of autologous tumor lysate-loaded dendritic cell vaccination for patients with glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-08 DOI:10.1111/ajco.14110
Mohammad Amin Habibi, Mohammad Sina Mirjani, Muhammad Hussain Ahmadvand, Pouria Delbari, Shayan Arab, Poriya Minaee, SeyedMohammad Eazi, Sajjad Ahmadpour
{"title":"The clinical utility of autologous tumor lysate-loaded dendritic cell vaccination for patients with glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Mohammad Amin Habibi,&nbsp;Mohammad Sina Mirjani,&nbsp;Muhammad Hussain Ahmadvand,&nbsp;Pouria Delbari,&nbsp;Shayan Arab,&nbsp;Poriya Minaee,&nbsp;SeyedMohammad Eazi,&nbsp;Sajjad Ahmadpour","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Dendritic cell (DC) vaccines show promise for glioma treatment, but optimal use remains uncertain. This meta-analysis examined DC vaccine efficacy and safety for gliomas.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This systematic review and meta-analysis study was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. From the date of inception to October 23, 2023, electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus have been thoroughly evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 12 studies with 998 patients and a mean age ranging from 40.2 to 56 years were included. Across 12 articles, DC vaccine 6-month overall survival (OS) was 100% [95% confidence interval {95%CI}: 100%–100%]. Respectively, 12-month OS reported 75% [95%CI: 65%–85%] but declined to 32% [95%CI: 20%–43%] for 24-month OS. 6- and 12-month progression-free survival reached 49% [95%CI: 21%–77%] and 19% [95%CI:8%–30%]. Studying radiological outcomes shows that complete response and partial response rates were 13% [95%CI: 17%–42%], and 26% [95%CI: 10%–42%], though stable disease reached 33% [95%CI: 15%–51%], suggesting predominant antineoplastic effects. The progressive disease rate also was 24% [95%CI: 9%–57%].</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In gliomas, DC vaccinations show a temporary efficacy; stability is more prevalent than regression. Impacts favor decreased resistance to early disease. Enhancing efficacy remains critical. Early therapy can be enhanced by appropriate supplementary therapy integration.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajco.14110","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajco.14110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Dendritic cell (DC) vaccines show promise for glioma treatment, but optimal use remains uncertain. This meta-analysis examined DC vaccine efficacy and safety for gliomas.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis study was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. From the date of inception to October 23, 2023, electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus have been thoroughly evaluated.

Results

A total of 12 studies with 998 patients and a mean age ranging from 40.2 to 56 years were included. Across 12 articles, DC vaccine 6-month overall survival (OS) was 100% [95% confidence interval {95%CI}: 100%–100%]. Respectively, 12-month OS reported 75% [95%CI: 65%–85%] but declined to 32% [95%CI: 20%–43%] for 24-month OS. 6- and 12-month progression-free survival reached 49% [95%CI: 21%–77%] and 19% [95%CI:8%–30%]. Studying radiological outcomes shows that complete response and partial response rates were 13% [95%CI: 17%–42%], and 26% [95%CI: 10%–42%], though stable disease reached 33% [95%CI: 15%–51%], suggesting predominant antineoplastic effects. The progressive disease rate also was 24% [95%CI: 9%–57%].

Conclusions

In gliomas, DC vaccinations show a temporary efficacy; stability is more prevalent than regression. Impacts favor decreased resistance to early disease. Enhancing efficacy remains critical. Early therapy can be enhanced by appropriate supplementary therapy integration.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胶质瘤患者接种自体肿瘤裂解物树突状细胞疫苗的临床效用:系统综述与荟萃分析。
背景:树突状细胞(DC)疫苗有望用于胶质瘤治疗,但其最佳使用方法仍不确定。这项荟萃分析研究了树突状细胞疫苗治疗胶质瘤的有效性和安全性:本系统综述和荟萃分析研究采用《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)进行。从开始到 2023 年 10 月 23 日,对 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Scopus 等电子数据库进行了全面评估:共纳入 12 项研究,998 名患者,平均年龄为 40.2 岁至 56 岁。12篇文章中,DC疫苗6个月总生存率(OS)为100%[95%置信区间{95%CI}:100%-100%]。12个月的OS报告为75%[95%CI:65%-85%],但24个月的OS则降至32%[95%CI:20%-43%]。6个月和12个月的无进展生存率分别为49% [95%CI:21%-77%] 和19% [95%CI:8%-30%]。放射学结果显示,完全应答率和部分应答率分别为13%[95%CI:17%-42%]和26%[95%CI:10%-42%],但疾病稳定率达到33%[95%CI:15%-51%],表明抗肿瘤作用占主导地位。疾病进展率也为 24% [95%CI: 9%-57%]:结论:在胶质瘤中,直流电疫苗接种显示出暂时的疗效;稳定比消退更普遍。结论:在胶质瘤中,DC 疫苗显示出暂时的疗效;稳定比消退更普遍。提高疗效仍然至关重要。早期治疗可通过适当的辅助治疗整合来提高疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information COSA's 51st Annual Scientific Meeting Bridging gaps, building progress, breaking down disparities 13-15 November 2024. COSA's 51st Annual Scientific Meeting Bridging gaps, building progress, breaking down disparities 13-15 November 2024. COSA's 51st Annual Scientific Meeting Bridging gaps, building progress, breaking down disparities 13-15 November 2024. COSA's 51st Annual Scientific Meeting Bridging gaps, building progress, breaking down disparities 13-15 November 2024.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1