Effectiveness of brain magnetic resonance imaging in the early diagnosis and characterization of dementias; a systematic review.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medicina Clinica Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1016/j.medcli.2024.05.028
Ana María Ruiz Tornero, Esther E García Carpintero, Begoña Rodríguez Ortiz de Salazar
{"title":"Effectiveness of brain magnetic resonance imaging in the early diagnosis and characterization of dementias; a systematic review.","authors":"Ana María Ruiz Tornero, Esther E García Carpintero, Begoña Rodríguez Ortiz de Salazar","doi":"10.1016/j.medcli.2024.05.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a frequently used test in the diagnosis of dementia. The objective was to evaluate its effectiveness for the early diagnosis of dementia in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Original studies were selected from systematic reviews between 2011 and 2021, according to PRISMA 2020 criteria. QUADAS-2 and GRADE tools were used, and a meta-analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Final selection of 23 articles. Patient selection and index test had a high probability of bias. The certainty of the evidence was very low. In the hippocampus, sensitivity was 0.62 (95%CI 0.48-0.79) and specificity 0.70 (95%CI 0.55-0.80). In the temporal lobe, sensitivity was 0.65 (range 0.45) and specificity 0.69 (range 0.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine brain MRI for the early diagnosis of dementia in patients with MCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":18578,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Clinica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2024.05.028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a frequently used test in the diagnosis of dementia. The objective was to evaluate its effectiveness for the early diagnosis of dementia in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

Material and methods: Original studies were selected from systematic reviews between 2011 and 2021, according to PRISMA 2020 criteria. QUADAS-2 and GRADE tools were used, and a meta-analysis was performed.

Results: Final selection of 23 articles. Patient selection and index test had a high probability of bias. The certainty of the evidence was very low. In the hippocampus, sensitivity was 0.62 (95%CI 0.48-0.79) and specificity 0.70 (95%CI 0.55-0.80). In the temporal lobe, sensitivity was 0.65 (range 0.45) and specificity 0.69 (range 0.32).

Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine brain MRI for the early diagnosis of dementia in patients with MCI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑磁共振成像在痴呆症早期诊断和定性方面的有效性;系统性综述。
简介磁共振成像(MRI)是诊断痴呆症的常用检查方法。本文旨在评估磁共振成像在早期诊断轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者痴呆症方面的有效性:根据 PRISMA 2020 标准,从 2011 年至 2021 年的系统综述中筛选出原创研究。采用 QUADAS-2 和 GRADE 工具,并进行荟萃分析:最终筛选出 23 篇文章。患者选择和指标测试存在较高的偏倚概率。证据的确定性很低。在海马区,灵敏度为 0.62(95%CI 0.48-0.79),特异性为 0.70(95%CI 0.55-0.80)。在颞叶,敏感性为 0.65(范围 0.45),特异性为 0.69(范围 0.32):没有足够的证据建议将常规脑磁共振成像用于MCI患者痴呆症的早期诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina Clinica
Medicina Clinica 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
295
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Medicina Clínica, fundada en 1943, es una publicación quincenal dedicada a la promoción de la investigación y de la práctica clínica entre los especialistas de la medicina interna, así como otras especialidades. Son características fundamentales de esta publicación el rigor científico y metodológico de sus artículos, la actualidad de los temas y, sobre todo, su sentido práctico, buscando siempre que la información sea de la mayor utilidad en la práctica clínica.
期刊最新文献
Dronedarone pneumonitis: a case report. Dysfunctional insertion of the electronic medical death certificate in the official statistics of causes of death. Ethics and challenges of artificial intelligence in healthcare. How could artificial intelligence improve patient experience in the ambulatory setting? Reflections from the JANUS group. Neuroborreliosis at the region of Asturias, Spain (2009-2022): Analysis of 38 cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1