Within-population variation in preference functions reveals substantial among-female disagreement in mate assessment.

IF 2.1 3区 生物学 Q3 ECOLOGY Journal of Evolutionary Biology Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1093/jeb/voae109
Kane Stratman, Gerlinde Höbel
{"title":"Within-population variation in preference functions reveals substantial among-female disagreement in mate assessment.","authors":"Kane Stratman, Gerlinde Höbel","doi":"10.1093/jeb/voae109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The mate choice behaviours of females can greatly affect patterns of reproductive success in males and influence the evolution of sexually selected male traits. Population-level estimates of display preferences may provide an accurate estimate of the strength and direction of selection by female choice if all females in the population show homogeneous preferences. However, population-level estimates may yield misleading estimates if there is within-population variation in mate preferences. While it is increasingly clear that the latter situation is common in nature, empirical data on the magnitude of variation in female preferences are required to improve our current understanding of its potential evolutionary consequences. We explored variations in female preference functions for 3 male call properties in a treefrog. We document substantial within-population variation not only in peak preferences but also in preference function shape (open, closed, flat), with at best 62% of females sharing a preference function shape with the respective population curve. Our findings suggest that population curves may accurately capture the direction of sexual selection, but depending on the properties of the constituting individual functions they may over- or underestimate the strength of selection. Particularly population estimates suggesting weak selection may in fact hide the presence of individual females with strong but opposing preferences. Moreover, due to the high within-population variation in both peak preferences and preference function shapes, the population functions drastically underestimate the predicted variation in male mating success in the population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evolutionary Biology","volume":" ","pages":"1278-1287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evolutionary Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jeb/voae109","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The mate choice behaviours of females can greatly affect patterns of reproductive success in males and influence the evolution of sexually selected male traits. Population-level estimates of display preferences may provide an accurate estimate of the strength and direction of selection by female choice if all females in the population show homogeneous preferences. However, population-level estimates may yield misleading estimates if there is within-population variation in mate preferences. While it is increasingly clear that the latter situation is common in nature, empirical data on the magnitude of variation in female preferences are required to improve our current understanding of its potential evolutionary consequences. We explored variations in female preference functions for 3 male call properties in a treefrog. We document substantial within-population variation not only in peak preferences but also in preference function shape (open, closed, flat), with at best 62% of females sharing a preference function shape with the respective population curve. Our findings suggest that population curves may accurately capture the direction of sexual selection, but depending on the properties of the constituting individual functions they may over- or underestimate the strength of selection. Particularly population estimates suggesting weak selection may in fact hide the presence of individual females with strong but opposing preferences. Moreover, due to the high within-population variation in both peak preferences and preference function shapes, the population functions drastically underestimate the predicted variation in male mating success in the population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
偏好函数在种群内的变化揭示了雌性之间在配偶评估方面的巨大分歧。
雌性的择偶行为会在很大程度上影响雄性的繁殖成功模式,并影响雄性性状的进化。如果种群中的所有雌性都表现出相同的择偶偏好,那么种群水平上的雌性择偶偏好估计值就能准确估计雌性择偶的强度和方向。然而,如果种群内的配偶偏好存在差异,种群水平的估计可能会产生误导。后一种情况在自然界中很常见,这一点已越来越清楚,但要提高我们目前对其潜在进化后果的认识,还需要有关雌性偏好变异程度的实证数据。我们探索了树蛙三种雄性叫声特性的雌性偏好函数的变异。我们不仅记录了峰值偏好的种群内差异,还记录了偏好函数形状(开放、封闭、平坦)的种群内差异,最多有 62% 的雌蛙与相应的种群曲线具有相同的偏好函数形状。我们的研究结果表明,种群曲线可以准确捕捉到性选择的方向,但根据构成个体函数的特性,它们可能会高估或低估选择的强度。特别是种群估计值表明选择较弱,但实际上可能掩盖了具有强烈但相反偏好的雌性个体的存在。此外,由于峰值偏好和偏好函数形状在种群内都有很大差异,种群函数大大低估了种群中雄性交配成功率的预测差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Journal of Evolutionary Biology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
152
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: It covers both micro- and macro-evolution of all types of organisms. The aim of the Journal is to integrate perspectives across molecular and microbial evolution, behaviour, genetics, ecology, life histories, development, palaeontology, systematics and morphology.
期刊最新文献
Clinal variation in autosomal satellite DNA clusters across a contact zone in Barker Frogs. An efficient deep learning method for amino acid substitution model selection. Exploring the importance of stochasticity to Hybrid Equilibria in a Discrete Signaling Game. How host-microbiome/holobiont evolution depends on whether the microbiome affects host lifespan or fecundity. Divergent ornamentation within a single population of the barn swallow.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1