Comparison of autonomic reactivity to trauma and nightmare imagery: A Pilot Study.

Christopher M McGrory, Augustus Kram Mendelsohn, Suzanne L Pineles, Natasha B Lasko, Vladimir Ivkovic, Mabelle Moon, Doga Cetinkaya, Oren Bazer, Elizabeth Fortier, Anne Kelly, Laura B Bragdon, Kimberly A Arditte Hall, Kaloyan Tanev, Scott P Orr, Edward F Pace-Schott
{"title":"Comparison of autonomic reactivity to trauma and nightmare imagery: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Christopher M McGrory, Augustus Kram Mendelsohn, Suzanne L Pineles, Natasha B Lasko, Vladimir Ivkovic, Mabelle Moon, Doga Cetinkaya, Oren Bazer, Elizabeth Fortier, Anne Kelly, Laura B Bragdon, Kimberly A Arditte Hall, Kaloyan Tanev, Scott P Orr, Edward F Pace-Schott","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>Trauma-related nightmares (TRNs) are a hallmark symptom of PTSD and are highly correlated with PTSD severity and poor sleep quality. Given the salience and arousal associated with TRNs, they might be an effective target for imaginal exposures during Prolonged Exposure (PE) therapy. As a first step in this line of research, the current study compared participants' emotional reactivity during recollection of TRNs to their recollection of the index traumatic event.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen trauma-exposed participants with clinical or sub-clinical PTSD who reported frequent TRNs engaged in script-driven imagery using scripts depicting their index trauma and their most trauma-like TRN. Heart rate (HRR), skin conductance (SCR), corrugator EMG (EMGR) responses, and emotional ratings were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HRR, SCR, and EMGR did not differ significantly between trauma-related and TRN scripts. Bayesian analyses confirmed support for the null hypothesis, indicating no differences. With the exception of \"Sadness,\" for which TRNs elicited significantly lower ratings than trauma scripts, individual emotion ratings showed no significant differences, suggesting likely parity between the emotionality of trauma-related and TRN recollections.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Together, TRN content elicited psychophysiological reactivity similar to that of the index trauma in this pilot study. Upon replication, studies testing TRNs as potential targets for imaginal exposures during PE may be warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":74808,"journal":{"name":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380112/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objectives: Trauma-related nightmares (TRNs) are a hallmark symptom of PTSD and are highly correlated with PTSD severity and poor sleep quality. Given the salience and arousal associated with TRNs, they might be an effective target for imaginal exposures during Prolonged Exposure (PE) therapy. As a first step in this line of research, the current study compared participants' emotional reactivity during recollection of TRNs to their recollection of the index traumatic event.

Methods: Seventeen trauma-exposed participants with clinical or sub-clinical PTSD who reported frequent TRNs engaged in script-driven imagery using scripts depicting their index trauma and their most trauma-like TRN. Heart rate (HRR), skin conductance (SCR), corrugator EMG (EMGR) responses, and emotional ratings were recorded.

Results: HRR, SCR, and EMGR did not differ significantly between trauma-related and TRN scripts. Bayesian analyses confirmed support for the null hypothesis, indicating no differences. With the exception of "Sadness," for which TRNs elicited significantly lower ratings than trauma scripts, individual emotion ratings showed no significant differences, suggesting likely parity between the emotionality of trauma-related and TRN recollections.

Conclusions: Together, TRN content elicited psychophysiological reactivity similar to that of the index trauma in this pilot study. Upon replication, studies testing TRNs as potential targets for imaginal exposures during PE may be warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较自律神经对创伤和噩梦意象的反应:试点研究
研究目的:创伤相关噩梦(TRNs)是创伤后应激障碍的标志性症状,与创伤后应激障碍的严重程度和睡眠质量差高度相关。鉴于与创伤相关噩梦的显著性和唤醒性,它们可能成为长期暴露疗法(PE)中意象暴露的有效目标。作为这一研究方向的第一步,本研究比较了参与者在回忆TRNs时的情绪反应与回忆指数创伤事件时的情绪反应:方法:17 名患有临床或亚临床创伤后应激障碍的创伤暴露参与者使用描述其创伤指数和最类似创伤的 TRN 的脚本进行脚本驱动的想象。研究人员记录了他们的心率(HRR)、皮肤电导(SCR)、皱纹肌肌电图(EMGR)反应和情绪评分:结果:HRR、SCR 和 EMGR 在创伤相关脚本和 TRN 脚本之间没有明显差异。贝叶斯分析证实了对零假设的支持,表明两者之间没有差异。除了 "悲伤"(TRN引起的评分明显低于创伤脚本)外,个体情感评分没有显著差异,这表明创伤相关回忆和TRN回忆的情感性可能是相同的:在这项试验性研究中,TRN 内容引起的心理生理反应类似于指数创伤引起的心理生理反应。在进行复制后,可能有必要对TRN进行测试,将其作为PE期间意象暴露的潜在目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"Infantgram?" recruitment of infants to a clinical sleep study via social media. Estimated prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea by occupation and industry in England: a descriptive study. Preliminary report: Sleep duration during late pregnancy predicts postpartum emotional responses among parents at risk for postpartum depression. Sex differences in the role of sleep on cognition in older adults. Extending weeknight sleep duration in late-sleeping adolescents using morning bright light on weekends: a 3-week maintenance study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1