Impact of Facility Volume on Overall Survival in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Palliative Treatment.

Praneet C Kaki, Aman M Patel, Lucy Revercomb, Russell Maxwell, Jason A Brant, Robert M Brody, Steven B Cannady, Ryan M Carey
{"title":"Impact of Facility Volume on Overall Survival in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Palliative Treatment.","authors":"Praneet C Kaki, Aman M Patel, Lucy Revercomb, Russell Maxwell, Jason A Brant, Robert M Brody, Steven B Cannady, Ryan M Carey","doi":"10.1177/10499091241281052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment at high-volume facilities (HVF) has been associated with improved prognosis of HNC patients undergoing curative treatment. Whether this systemic factor influences survival outcomes of patients with HNC undergoing palliative treatment is unknown.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the impact of palliative treatment facility volume on overall survival (OS) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The 2004 to 2018 National Cancer Database was queried retrospectively for patients with HNC undergoing palliative treatment.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>Patients were stratified based on treatment facility volume percentile. Multivariable binary logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression models were implemented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 8682 patients included, 1661 (19.1%) underwent palliative therapy at facilities with volume ≥80<sup>th</sup> percentile. Among 972 facilities included, 643 (66.2%), 182 (18.7%), 85 (8.8%), 44 (4.5%), and 18 (1.9%) had volume <20<sup>th</sup>, 20-40<sup>th</sup>, 40-60<sup>th</sup>, 60-80<sup>th</sup>, and ≥80<sup>th</sup> percentiles, respectively. 5-year OS rates of patients undergoing palliative therapy at facilities with volume <20<sup>th</sup>, 20-40<sup>th</sup>, 40-60<sup>th</sup>, 60-80<sup>th</sup>, and ≥80<sup>th</sup> percentile was 11%, 13%, 11%, 14%, and 23%, respectively (<i>P</i> < .001). Facility volume ≥80<sup>th</sup> percentile was associated with higher 5-year OS on multivariable Cox regression (aHR 0.34, 95% CI 0.16-0.69, <i>P</i> < .001). Surgical treatment (aOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.07-1.68, <i>P</i> = .012) was associated with undergoing treatment at facilities with volume ≥80<sup>th</sup> percentile.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Undergoing palliative treatment at HVFs is associated with higher OS in HNC. The survival benefit derived from high facility volume should be carefully considered in the context of other patient and facility characteristics in end-of-life management, with specific emphasis on patient-directed goals of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241281052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Treatment at high-volume facilities (HVF) has been associated with improved prognosis of HNC patients undergoing curative treatment. Whether this systemic factor influences survival outcomes of patients with HNC undergoing palliative treatment is unknown.

Aim: To investigate the impact of palliative treatment facility volume on overall survival (OS) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC).

Design: The 2004 to 2018 National Cancer Database was queried retrospectively for patients with HNC undergoing palliative treatment.

Setting/participants: Patients were stratified based on treatment facility volume percentile. Multivariable binary logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression models were implemented.

Results: Of 8682 patients included, 1661 (19.1%) underwent palliative therapy at facilities with volume ≥80th percentile. Among 972 facilities included, 643 (66.2%), 182 (18.7%), 85 (8.8%), 44 (4.5%), and 18 (1.9%) had volume <20th, 20-40th, 40-60th, 60-80th, and ≥80th percentiles, respectively. 5-year OS rates of patients undergoing palliative therapy at facilities with volume <20th, 20-40th, 40-60th, 60-80th, and ≥80th percentile was 11%, 13%, 11%, 14%, and 23%, respectively (P < .001). Facility volume ≥80th percentile was associated with higher 5-year OS on multivariable Cox regression (aHR 0.34, 95% CI 0.16-0.69, P < .001). Surgical treatment (aOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.07-1.68, P = .012) was associated with undergoing treatment at facilities with volume ≥80th percentile.

Conclusions: Undergoing palliative treatment at HVFs is associated with higher OS in HNC. The survival benefit derived from high facility volume should be carefully considered in the context of other patient and facility characteristics in end-of-life management, with specific emphasis on patient-directed goals of care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设施容量对接受姑息治疗的头颈癌患者总生存期的影响
背景:在高容量设施(HVF)接受治疗与接受根治性治疗的HNC患者预后的改善有关。这一系统性因素是否会影响接受姑息治疗的HNC患者的生存结果尚不清楚。目的:研究姑息治疗机构的数量对头颈癌(HNC)患者总生存期(OS)的影响:回顾性查询2004年至2018年全国癌症数据库中接受姑息治疗的HNC患者:根据治疗机构数量百分位数对患者进行分层。采用多变量二元逻辑和考克斯比例危险回归模型:在纳入的 8682 名患者中,有 1661 人(19.1%)在容量≥第 80 百分位数的机构接受了姑息治疗。在纳入的 972 家医疗机构中,有 643 家(66.2%)、182 家(18.7%)、85 家(8.8%)、44 家(4.5%)和 18 家(1.9%)的医疗机构的容积th、20-40th、40-60th、60-80th 和≥80th 百分位数分别为th、20-40th、40-60th、60-80th 和≥80th 百分位数。在容积th、20-40th、40-60th、60-80th和≥80th百分位数的机构接受姑息治疗的患者的5年OS率分别为11%、13%、11%、14%和23%(P < .001)。设施容积≥第80百分位数与较高的5年OS相关(aHR 0.34,95% CI 0.16-0.69,P < .001)。手术治疗(aOR 1.34,95% CI 1.07-1.68,P = .012)与在容量≥第80百分位数的机构接受治疗有关:结论:在HVF接受姑息治疗与HNC较高的OS有关。在生命末期管理中,应结合患者和医疗机构的其他特征仔细考虑高容量医疗机构带来的生存益处,并特别强调以患者为导向的护理目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Symptoms and Prognoses of Patients With Breast Cancer and Malignant Wounds in Palliative Care Units: The Multicenter, Prospective, Observational EASED Study. Development and Validation of the Home Hospice Care Needs Questionnaire for the Dying Old Adult (HHCNQ-DE) in Mainland China. Long-Term Impact of the End-of-Life Care Nursing Education Consortium on Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice (KAP) of Indian Nurses Working in Non-Palliative Care Settings: A KAP-GAP Analysis. The Perspective of Cancer Patients in Palliative Care on Unmet Needs: A Qualitative Synthesis Using Meta-Ethnography. Caring for Patients Requiring Venous Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Can Upstream Palliative Care Make a Difference?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1