Precision Test of a Multifunctional Scan Body for the Scan and Cross-Mount of an Edentulous Arch: A Pilot Case-Control Study.

Albert Young Hoon Lee, Steve T Hahn
{"title":"Precision Test of a Multifunctional Scan Body for the Scan and Cross-Mount of an Edentulous Arch: A Pilot Case-Control Study.","authors":"Albert Young Hoon Lee, Steve T Hahn","doi":"10.11607/prd.7198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The primary goal of this pilot study was to evaluate, via 3D analysis, the scan body precision of an intraoral digital scan utilizing a custom multifunctional scan body compared to that of digitized stone models fabricated from a conventional open tray impression in the fully edentulous maxilla and mandible. The secondary goal of this study was to showcase a method for utilizing the scan body library to generate a fixed fiducial marker for the cross-mount of an edentulous arch. Comparative analysis was performed as a case-control study. A custom scan body was utilized to generate the positions of the titanium bases from the intraoral models and digitized stone models of three maxillary arches (All-On-6, All-On-5, and All-On-4) and two mandibular arches (both All-On-4). The titanium base positions were compared using advanced 3D inspection software. The mean ± SD deviation was 30.38 ± 17.78 μm (95% CI: [14.8 to 45.97 μm]), with mean deviations of 38.73 ± 19.24 μm (95% CI: 16.96 to 60.5 μm) in the maxilla and 17.85 ± 0.92 μm (95% CI: 16.58 to 19.12 μm) in the mandible. The present results were promising, showing that deviations between the intraoral impressions and the digitized stone models fell within established tolerance ranges. Initial studies showed promising results that the digital workflow could be implemented with success similar to the conventional approach. Using the scan body library to generate a fiducial marker successfully demonstrated an efficient method for cross-mounting the edentulous arch.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.7198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary goal of this pilot study was to evaluate, via 3D analysis, the scan body precision of an intraoral digital scan utilizing a custom multifunctional scan body compared to that of digitized stone models fabricated from a conventional open tray impression in the fully edentulous maxilla and mandible. The secondary goal of this study was to showcase a method for utilizing the scan body library to generate a fixed fiducial marker for the cross-mount of an edentulous arch. Comparative analysis was performed as a case-control study. A custom scan body was utilized to generate the positions of the titanium bases from the intraoral models and digitized stone models of three maxillary arches (All-On-6, All-On-5, and All-On-4) and two mandibular arches (both All-On-4). The titanium base positions were compared using advanced 3D inspection software. The mean ± SD deviation was 30.38 ± 17.78 μm (95% CI: [14.8 to 45.97 μm]), with mean deviations of 38.73 ± 19.24 μm (95% CI: 16.96 to 60.5 μm) in the maxilla and 17.85 ± 0.92 μm (95% CI: 16.58 to 19.12 μm) in the mandible. The present results were promising, showing that deviations between the intraoral impressions and the digitized stone models fell within established tolerance ranges. Initial studies showed promising results that the digital workflow could be implemented with success similar to the conventional approach. Using the scan body library to generate a fiducial marker successfully demonstrated an efficient method for cross-mounting the edentulous arch.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于无牙弓扫描和交叉安装的多功能扫描体的精度测试:病例对照试验研究。
研究目的这项试验性研究的主要目的是评估使用定制多功能扫描体进行口内数字化扫描的三维对比结果,以及根据传统的上下颌骨全缺牙开托盘印模制作的数字化牙石模型的三维对比结果,以测试扫描体的精确度。这项研究的第二个目标是展示一种利用扫描体库生成无牙颌牙弓交叉安装固定靶标的方法。设计:以病例对照研究的形式进行比较分析。方法:利用定制扫描体从三个上颌牙弓(All-On-6、All-On-5 和 All-On-4)和两个下颌 All-On-4 牙弓的口内模型和数字化牙石模型中生成钛基底的位置。使用先进的 3D 检测软件对钛基托的位置进行了比较。结果:平均±SD 为 30.38±17.78 μm(95% CI:[14.8-45.97 μm])。上颌骨的平均±SD 为 38.73±19.24 μm(95% CI:16.96-60.5 μm),下颌骨的平均±SD 为 17.85±0.92 μm(95% CI:16.58-19.12 μm)。结论研究结果表明,口内印模与数字化牙石模型之间的偏差在既定的容差范围内,这一点很有希望。初步研究结果表明,数字化工作流程的成功实施与传统方法类似。使用扫描体库生成靶标,成功展示了一种高效的无牙弓交叉安装方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Cement- Versus Screw-Retained Implant Positioning in the Esthetic Zone on Emergence Angle: A Proof-of-Principle Study. The Management of Gingival Fenestration: A Series of Three Cases. Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Patient Communication: Current Possibilities. Autonomous Dental Implant Robotic System Utilization for Implant Placement and Transcrestal Sinus Elevation Using Osseodensification: A Case Report. Alveolar Ridge Preservation Procedures Performed with Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft: Clinical and Histologic Outcomes in a Case Series: Part II.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1