Evaluation of AI-enhanced non-mydriatic fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.104331
{"title":"Evaluation of AI-enhanced non-mydriatic fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.104331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the feasibility of using non-mydriatic fundus photography in conjunction with an artificial intelligence (AI) reading platform for large-scale screening of diabetic retinopathy (DR).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this study, we selected 120 patients with diabetes hospitalized in our institution from December 2019 to April 2021. Retinal imaging of 240 eyes was obtained using non-mydriatic fundus photography. The fundus images of these patients were divided into two groups based on different interpretation methods. In Experiment Group 1, the images were analyzed and graded for DR diagnosis using an AI reading platform. In Experiment Group 2, the images were analyzed and graded for DR diagnosis by an associate chief physician in ophthalmology, specializing in fundus diseases. Concurrently, all patients underwent the gold standard for DR diagnosis and grading—fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA)—with the outcomes serving as the Control Group. The diagnostic value of the two methods was assessed by comparing the results of Experiment Groups 1 and 2 with those of the Control Group.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Keeping the control group (FFA results) as the gold standard, no significant differences were observed between the two experimental groups regarding diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate, false negative rate, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, Youden's index, Kappa value, and diagnostic accuracy (X<sup>2</sup> = 0.371, <em>P</em> &gt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Compared with the manual reading group, the AI reading group revealed no significant differences across all diagnostic indicators, exhibiting high sensitivity and specificity, as well as a relatively high positive predictive value. Additionally, it demonstrated a high level of diagnostic consistency with the gold standard. This technology holds potential for suitability in large-scale screening of DR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20141,"journal":{"name":"Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572100024003685/pdfft?md5=c42f9624f76d9fea4abb28f781b329be&pid=1-s2.0-S1572100024003685-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572100024003685","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess the feasibility of using non-mydriatic fundus photography in conjunction with an artificial intelligence (AI) reading platform for large-scale screening of diabetic retinopathy (DR).

Methods

In this study, we selected 120 patients with diabetes hospitalized in our institution from December 2019 to April 2021. Retinal imaging of 240 eyes was obtained using non-mydriatic fundus photography. The fundus images of these patients were divided into two groups based on different interpretation methods. In Experiment Group 1, the images were analyzed and graded for DR diagnosis using an AI reading platform. In Experiment Group 2, the images were analyzed and graded for DR diagnosis by an associate chief physician in ophthalmology, specializing in fundus diseases. Concurrently, all patients underwent the gold standard for DR diagnosis and grading—fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA)—with the outcomes serving as the Control Group. The diagnostic value of the two methods was assessed by comparing the results of Experiment Groups 1 and 2 with those of the Control Group.

Results

Keeping the control group (FFA results) as the gold standard, no significant differences were observed between the two experimental groups regarding diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate, false negative rate, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, Youden's index, Kappa value, and diagnostic accuracy (X2 = 0.371, P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with the manual reading group, the AI reading group revealed no significant differences across all diagnostic indicators, exhibiting high sensitivity and specificity, as well as a relatively high positive predictive value. Additionally, it demonstrated a high level of diagnostic consistency with the gold standard. This technology holds potential for suitability in large-scale screening of DR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估用于糖尿病视网膜病变筛查的人工智能增强型非水动力眼底摄影。
目的评估将非眼球屈光眼底摄影与人工智能(AI)阅片平台结合用于糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)大规模筛查的可行性:在这项研究中,我们选择了2019年12月至2021年4月在我院住院的120名糖尿病患者。使用非眼球屈光眼底照相术获得了 240 只眼睛的视网膜成像。根据不同的判读方法,这些患者的眼底图像被分为两组。实验组 1 使用人工智能阅读平台对图像进行分析和分级,以诊断 DR。在实验组 2 中,由眼底疾病专业的眼科副主任医师对图像进行分析和分级,以诊断 DR。与此同时,所有患者都接受了 DR 诊断和分级的金标准--眼底荧光素血管造影术(FFA)--结果作为对照组。通过比较实验组 1 和 2 与对照组的结果,评估两种方法的诊断价值:结果:以对照组(FFA 结果)为金标准,两个实验组在诊断灵敏度、特异性、假阳性率、假阴性率、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、尤登指数、Kappa 值和诊断准确性方面均无显著差异(X2 = 0.371,P > 0.05):与人工读片组相比,人工智能读片组在所有诊断指标上均无显着差异,表现出较高的灵敏度和特异性,以及相对较高的阳性预测值。此外,它还显示出与金标准诊断的高度一致性。该技术有望适用于大规模 DR 筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.20%
发文量
509
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy is an international journal for the dissemination of scientific knowledge and clinical developments of Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy in all medical specialties. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, case presentations, "how-to-do-it" articles, Letters to the Editor, short communications and relevant images with short descriptions. All submitted material is subject to a strict peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the therapeutic effects of photodynamic therapy in vulvar lichen sclerosus and impact on patient quality of life and sexual funtion Clinical trial of two-step photodynamic therapy for reduced pain in the treatment of precancerous squamous lesions (Actinic keratoses) The lack of causal link between myopia and intraocular pressure: Insights from cross-sectional analysis and Mendelian randomization study Combinatory effect of ALA-PDT and itraconazole in the treatment of cutaneous protothecosis 5-Aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy is a safe and effective treatment for female patients with intractable vulvar lichen sclerosus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1