Validity of estimated aortic pulse wave velocity measured during the 6-minute walk test to predict anaerobic fitness before major non-cardiac surgery.

J Ripollés-Melchor, M I Monge García, A Ruiz-Escobar, E Sáez-Ruiz, B Algar-Yañez, A Abad-Motos, A Abad-Gurumeta
{"title":"Validity of estimated aortic pulse wave velocity measured during the 6-minute walk test to predict anaerobic fitness before major non-cardiac surgery.","authors":"J Ripollés-Melchor, M I Monge García, A Ruiz-Escobar, E Sáez-Ruiz, B Algar-Yañez, A Abad-Motos, A Abad-Gurumeta","doi":"10.1016/j.redare.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to assess the efficacy of estimated preoperative aortic pulse wave velocity (AoPWV) to discriminate between low and high 6 min walk test (6MWT) distance in patients awaiting major non-cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective observational study in 133 patients undergoing non cardiac surgery. AoPWV and the distance walked during a 6MWT were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine two different AoPWV cut-points for predicting a distance of 427 metres in the 6MWT. We also calculated lower and upper AoPWV cut-points (probability ≥ 0.75) for predicting a distance of < 427 metres, ≥ 427 metres, and also 563 metres in the 6MWT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ROC curve analysis for the < 427 metre distance revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.56-0.79) and an AUC of 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.61-0.83) for > 563 metres. Patients with AoPWV > 10.97 m/s should be considered high risk, while those with < 9.42 m/s can be considered low risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AoPWV is a simple, non-invasive, useful clinical tool for identifying and stratifying patients awaiting major non-cardiac surgery. In situations of clinical uncertainty, additional measures should be taken to assess the risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":94196,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redare.2024.09.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of estimated preoperative aortic pulse wave velocity (AoPWV) to discriminate between low and high 6 min walk test (6MWT) distance in patients awaiting major non-cardiac surgery.

Methods: Prospective observational study in 133 patients undergoing non cardiac surgery. AoPWV and the distance walked during a 6MWT were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine two different AoPWV cut-points for predicting a distance of 427 metres in the 6MWT. We also calculated lower and upper AoPWV cut-points (probability ≥ 0.75) for predicting a distance of < 427 metres, ≥ 427 metres, and also 563 metres in the 6MWT.

Results: The ROC curve analysis for the < 427 metre distance revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.56-0.79) and an AUC of 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.61-0.83) for > 563 metres. Patients with AoPWV > 10.97 m/s should be considered high risk, while those with < 9.42 m/s can be considered low risk.

Conclusions: AoPWV is a simple, non-invasive, useful clinical tool for identifying and stratifying patients awaiting major non-cardiac surgery. In situations of clinical uncertainty, additional measures should be taken to assess the risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 6 分钟步行测试中测量的主动脉脉搏波速度估计值在预测非心脏大手术前的有氧体能方面的有效性。
背景:本研究旨在评估估计的术前主动脉脉搏波速度(AoPWV)在区分等待接受非心脏大手术的患者6分钟步行测试(6MWT)距离过短和过长方面的有效性:方法:对 133 名接受非心脏手术的患者进行前瞻性观察研究。方法:对 133 名接受非心脏手术的患者进行了前瞻性观察研究,评估了患者的 AoPWV 和 6MWT 步行距离。使用接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)分析确定了两个不同的 AoPWV 切点,用于预测 6MWT 步行 427 米的距离。我们还计算了预测 6MWT 距离< 427 米、≥ 427 米和 563 米的较低和较高 AoPWV 切点(概率≥ 0.75):对<427米距离的ROC曲线分析显示,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.68(95%置信区间为0.56-0.79),对>563米距离的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.72(95%置信区间为0.61-0.83)。AoPWV>10.97米/秒的患者应被视为高风险,而AoPWV<9.42米/秒的患者可被视为低风险:AoPWV是一种简单、无创、有用的临床工具,可用于识别和分层等待非心脏大手术的患者。在临床不确定的情况下,应采取其他措施来评估风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Validity of estimated aortic pulse wave velocity measured during the 6-minute walk test to predict anaerobic fitness before major non-cardiac surgery. Intraoperative Goal-Directed Hemodynamic Therapy through Fluid Administration to Optimize the Stroke Volume: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Recommendations of the Pre-anaesthesia Teleconsultation Task Force. Use of fluid therapy in perioperative adult patients: a narrative review. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia, Morgagni-Larrey type
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1