Effect of silver diamine fluoride application on the microtensile bond strength of three commonly used restorative materials in primary teeth: An ultrastructural study.

Ishita Banerjee, Ananjan Chatterjee, Gautam Kumar Kundu, Shabnam Zahir, Swapan Kumar Purkait, Shikhar Kumar
{"title":"Effect of silver diamine fluoride application on the microtensile bond strength of three commonly used restorative materials in primary teeth: An ultrastructural study.","authors":"Ishita Banerjee, Ananjan Chatterjee, Gautam Kumar Kundu, Shabnam Zahir, Swapan Kumar Purkait, Shikhar Kumar","doi":"10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_22_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Caries in primary teeth rapidly advances owing to its thin structure, thereby requiring restoration. However, restorations often fail due to various causes such as secondary caries and reduced microtensile bond strength (μTBS), which calls for the use of antimicrobial agents such as silver diamine fluoride (SDF).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to measure and analyse the effect of SDF application on the μTBS of three regularly used restorative materials to dentin of primary teeth as well as compare the types of bond failure interfaces under SEM.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study comprised 60 samples equally divided into six groups among three restorative materials, namely, glass ionomer cement (GIC, Groups I and II), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC, Groups III and IV), and composite resin (Groups V and VI) with subdivisions of A and B, where A represented samples with SDF application and B represented samples without SDF application.</p><p><strong>Results and observations: </strong>It was observed that μTBS of RMGIC to sound and carious dentin irrespective of SDF application was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.05), and when GIC, RMGIC, and composite resins were compared to both sound and carious dentin irrespective of SDF application, it was statistically significant (P < 0.05). SEM analysis revealed predominantly cohesive failures among all the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the results, it was concluded that SDF has no adverse effect on the μTBS of GIC, RMGIC, and composite resin to both carious and sound dentin of primary teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":101311,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry","volume":"42 3","pages":"240-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_22_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Caries in primary teeth rapidly advances owing to its thin structure, thereby requiring restoration. However, restorations often fail due to various causes such as secondary caries and reduced microtensile bond strength (μTBS), which calls for the use of antimicrobial agents such as silver diamine fluoride (SDF).

Aim: This study aims to measure and analyse the effect of SDF application on the μTBS of three regularly used restorative materials to dentin of primary teeth as well as compare the types of bond failure interfaces under SEM.

Materials and methods: The study comprised 60 samples equally divided into six groups among three restorative materials, namely, glass ionomer cement (GIC, Groups I and II), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC, Groups III and IV), and composite resin (Groups V and VI) with subdivisions of A and B, where A represented samples with SDF application and B represented samples without SDF application.

Results and observations: It was observed that μTBS of RMGIC to sound and carious dentin irrespective of SDF application was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.05), and when GIC, RMGIC, and composite resins were compared to both sound and carious dentin irrespective of SDF application, it was statistically significant (P < 0.05). SEM analysis revealed predominantly cohesive failures among all the groups.

Conclusion: Based on the results, it was concluded that SDF has no adverse effect on the μTBS of GIC, RMGIC, and composite resin to both carious and sound dentin of primary teeth.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二胺氟化银对三种常用基牙修复材料微张力粘接强度的影响:超微结构研究。
简介乳牙由于结构薄,龋坏发展迅速,因此需要进行修复。目的:本研究旨在测量和分析使用 SDF 对三种常用修复材料与基牙牙本质的微张力粘接强度(μTBS)的影响,并比较 SEM 下粘接失败界面的类型:研究包括 60 个样本,将三种修复材料平均分为六组,即玻璃离子粘固剂(GIC,第一组和第二组)、树脂改性玻璃离子粘固剂(RMGIC,第三组和第四组)和复合树脂(第五组和第六组),并分为 A 组和 B 组,其中 A 组代表使用了 SDF 的样本,B 组代表未使用 SDF 的样本:观察发现,无论是否使用 SDF,RMGIC 对健全牙本质和龋坏牙本质的 μTBS 都具有统计学意义(P < 0.05);无论是否使用 SDF,当 GIC、RMGIC 和复合树脂与健全牙本质和龋坏牙本质进行比较时,其 μTBS 都具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。扫描电镜分析表明,所有组别均以内聚失效为主:根据研究结果得出结论,SDF 对 GIC、RMGIC 和复合树脂在基牙龋坏和健全牙本质上的μTBS 均无不良影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Challenges faced by dentists during provision of oral health care in children and adolescents with special health-care needs: A scoping review. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of various intracanal medicament in young permanent teeth: An in vivo study. Comparison of intranasal ketamine with intranasal midazolam and dexmedetomidine combination in pediatric dental patients for procedural sedation: A crossover study. Effect of oil pulling on the Streptococcus mutans concentation in plaque around orthodontic brackets -A prospective clinical study. Effect of silver diamine fluoride application on the microtensile bond strength of three commonly used restorative materials in primary teeth: An ultrastructural study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1