Effect of temperature on rehydration and fracture resistance of reattached tooth fragments after crown fracture: An in vitro study.

Mohammad Atif, Nitesh Tewari, Garima Jhunjhunwala, Hemlata Nehta, Morankar Rahul, Vijay Prakash Mathur, Kalpana Bansal
{"title":"Effect of temperature on rehydration and fracture resistance of reattached tooth fragments after crown fracture: An in vitro study.","authors":"Mohammad Atif, Nitesh Tewari, Garima Jhunjhunwala, Hemlata Nehta, Morankar Rahul, Vijay Prakash Mathur, Kalpana Bansal","doi":"10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_176_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uncomplicated crown fractures of maxillary anterior teeth are common dental injuries, and the bonding of fractured fragments is recommended for management. Rehydration of fragments improves bonding and fracture resistance. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the fracture resistance of the reattached tooth fragment of the incisor crown after rehydration using either a steamer or a humidifier.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Bovine teeth were used as a model. Fractured fragments were divided into three groups: Group I (no rehydration), Group II (rehydration by humidifier), and Group III (rehydration by steamer). Fragments were reattached using a standard bonding protocol. Fracture resistance was tested using a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance and Chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The force required to fracture the reattached fragments was significantly higher in Group II (humidifier) compared to Group I (no rehydration) (P = 0.005). Group III (steamer) had a force value similar to Group I, indicating no significant improvement in fracture resistance with steamer rehydration. The temperature inside the steam-based chamber reached an average of 95.7°C with 95% humidity, whereas the conventional humidification chamber had an average temperature of 39.2°C and 84% humidity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitations of the present study, the rehydration protocol using a steam-based chamber was found to have a significantly lower force required to fracture the reattached fragments as compared to humidifier-based chamber. This was not significantly different from the fragments which were reattached without rehydration.</p>","PeriodicalId":101311,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry","volume":"42 3","pages":"249-254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_176_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Uncomplicated crown fractures of maxillary anterior teeth are common dental injuries, and the bonding of fractured fragments is recommended for management. Rehydration of fragments improves bonding and fracture resistance. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the fracture resistance of the reattached tooth fragment of the incisor crown after rehydration using either a steamer or a humidifier.

Materials and methods: Bovine teeth were used as a model. Fractured fragments were divided into three groups: Group I (no rehydration), Group II (rehydration by humidifier), and Group III (rehydration by steamer). Fragments were reattached using a standard bonding protocol. Fracture resistance was tested using a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance and Chi-square tests.

Results: The force required to fracture the reattached fragments was significantly higher in Group II (humidifier) compared to Group I (no rehydration) (P = 0.005). Group III (steamer) had a force value similar to Group I, indicating no significant improvement in fracture resistance with steamer rehydration. The temperature inside the steam-based chamber reached an average of 95.7°C with 95% humidity, whereas the conventional humidification chamber had an average temperature of 39.2°C and 84% humidity.

Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, the rehydration protocol using a steam-based chamber was found to have a significantly lower force required to fracture the reattached fragments as compared to humidifier-based chamber. This was not significantly different from the fragments which were reattached without rehydration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
温度对牙冠折断后再接合牙齿碎片的再水化和抗折性的影响:体外研究。
背景:上颌前牙无并发症牙冠骨折是常见的牙科损伤,建议对骨折片进行粘接处理。碎片的再水化可提高粘接性和抗折性。因此,本研究的目的是比较使用蒸汽机或加湿器补水后重新粘接的门牙牙冠牙齿碎片的抗折性:材料和方法:以牛牙为模型。折断的牙齿碎片分为三组:第一组(不补水)、第二组(用加湿器补水)和第三组(用蒸汽机补水)。使用标准粘接方案对碎片进行重新粘接。使用万能试验机对抗折性进行测试。统计分析采用方差分析和卡方检验:结果:与第一组(未补水)相比,第二组(加湿器)使重新粘接的碎片断裂所需的力明显更高(P = 0.005)。第三组(蒸气机)的力值与第一组相似,表明蒸气机补水对抗折性没有明显改善。蒸汽室的平均温度为 95.7°C,湿度为 95%,而传统加湿室的平均温度为 39.2°C,湿度为 84%:在本研究的限制条件下,使用蒸汽室的补液方案与使用加湿器的补液室相比,使重新接合的碎片断裂所需的力明显较低。这与未经补水而重新接合的碎片没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Challenges faced by dentists during provision of oral health care in children and adolescents with special health-care needs: A scoping review. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of various intracanal medicament in young permanent teeth: An in vivo study. Comparison of intranasal ketamine with intranasal midazolam and dexmedetomidine combination in pediatric dental patients for procedural sedation: A crossover study. Effect of oil pulling on the Streptococcus mutans concentation in plaque around orthodontic brackets -A prospective clinical study. Effect of silver diamine fluoride application on the microtensile bond strength of three commonly used restorative materials in primary teeth: An ultrastructural study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1