{"title":"Effect of temperature on rehydration and fracture resistance of reattached tooth fragments after crown fracture: An in vitro study.","authors":"Mohammad Atif, Nitesh Tewari, Garima Jhunjhunwala, Hemlata Nehta, Morankar Rahul, Vijay Prakash Mathur, Kalpana Bansal","doi":"10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_176_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uncomplicated crown fractures of maxillary anterior teeth are common dental injuries, and the bonding of fractured fragments is recommended for management. Rehydration of fragments improves bonding and fracture resistance. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the fracture resistance of the reattached tooth fragment of the incisor crown after rehydration using either a steamer or a humidifier.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Bovine teeth were used as a model. Fractured fragments were divided into three groups: Group I (no rehydration), Group II (rehydration by humidifier), and Group III (rehydration by steamer). Fragments were reattached using a standard bonding protocol. Fracture resistance was tested using a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance and Chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The force required to fracture the reattached fragments was significantly higher in Group II (humidifier) compared to Group I (no rehydration) (P = 0.005). Group III (steamer) had a force value similar to Group I, indicating no significant improvement in fracture resistance with steamer rehydration. The temperature inside the steam-based chamber reached an average of 95.7°C with 95% humidity, whereas the conventional humidification chamber had an average temperature of 39.2°C and 84% humidity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitations of the present study, the rehydration protocol using a steam-based chamber was found to have a significantly lower force required to fracture the reattached fragments as compared to humidifier-based chamber. This was not significantly different from the fragments which were reattached without rehydration.</p>","PeriodicalId":101311,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry","volume":"42 3","pages":"249-254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_176_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Uncomplicated crown fractures of maxillary anterior teeth are common dental injuries, and the bonding of fractured fragments is recommended for management. Rehydration of fragments improves bonding and fracture resistance. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the fracture resistance of the reattached tooth fragment of the incisor crown after rehydration using either a steamer or a humidifier.
Materials and methods: Bovine teeth were used as a model. Fractured fragments were divided into three groups: Group I (no rehydration), Group II (rehydration by humidifier), and Group III (rehydration by steamer). Fragments were reattached using a standard bonding protocol. Fracture resistance was tested using a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance and Chi-square tests.
Results: The force required to fracture the reattached fragments was significantly higher in Group II (humidifier) compared to Group I (no rehydration) (P = 0.005). Group III (steamer) had a force value similar to Group I, indicating no significant improvement in fracture resistance with steamer rehydration. The temperature inside the steam-based chamber reached an average of 95.7°C with 95% humidity, whereas the conventional humidification chamber had an average temperature of 39.2°C and 84% humidity.
Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, the rehydration protocol using a steam-based chamber was found to have a significantly lower force required to fracture the reattached fragments as compared to humidifier-based chamber. This was not significantly different from the fragments which were reattached without rehydration.