Evaluation of gas content in organic-rich shale: A review of the history, current status, and future directions

IF 8.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Geoscience frontiers Pub Date : 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1016/j.gsf.2024.101921
Haikuan Nie , Wei Dang , Qin Zhang , Jinchuan Zhang , Pei Li , Shaohua Zhang , Jianghui Ding , Qian Chen , Yubo Feng , Xin Zhang
{"title":"Evaluation of gas content in organic-rich shale: A review of the history, current status, and future directions","authors":"Haikuan Nie ,&nbsp;Wei Dang ,&nbsp;Qin Zhang ,&nbsp;Jinchuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Pei Li ,&nbsp;Shaohua Zhang ,&nbsp;Jianghui Ding ,&nbsp;Qian Chen ,&nbsp;Yubo Feng ,&nbsp;Xin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.gsf.2024.101921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Shale gas is being hailed as the green energy of the future due to high heating value, low carbon emissions, and large reserves. Gas content of shale is a key parameter for evaluating the shale gas potential and screening for the shale gas sweet spots. Although the concept of gas content has been well defined, obtaining a reliable gas content data still remains a challenge. A significant barrier is the method for evaluating the gas content. In this paper, we provide a review of the long-established and recently developed gas content evaluation methods. In the first part of this review article, the history of gas content evaluation methods is summarized since 1910s, relied on published and unpublished literatures as well as our own experiences. Then, the fundamental contents and concepts involved in gas content evaluation are introduced to provide a clear theoretical foundation for the methods. In the third part, eleven evaluation methods, including four direct methods and seven indirect methods, are systematically reviewed. In each method, its application to evaluating the gas content is presented, the key advances are highlighted, and the advantages and limitations are discussed. Finally, future directions are discussed to promote creative thinking across disciplines to develop new methods or improve current methods for evaluating the gas content more accurately and efficiently.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12711,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience frontiers","volume":"15 6","pages":"Article 101921"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987124001452/pdfft?md5=f21edd7b73980707536740399085d920&pid=1-s2.0-S1674987124001452-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987124001452","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shale gas is being hailed as the green energy of the future due to high heating value, low carbon emissions, and large reserves. Gas content of shale is a key parameter for evaluating the shale gas potential and screening for the shale gas sweet spots. Although the concept of gas content has been well defined, obtaining a reliable gas content data still remains a challenge. A significant barrier is the method for evaluating the gas content. In this paper, we provide a review of the long-established and recently developed gas content evaluation methods. In the first part of this review article, the history of gas content evaluation methods is summarized since 1910s, relied on published and unpublished literatures as well as our own experiences. Then, the fundamental contents and concepts involved in gas content evaluation are introduced to provide a clear theoretical foundation for the methods. In the third part, eleven evaluation methods, including four direct methods and seven indirect methods, are systematically reviewed. In each method, its application to evaluating the gas content is presented, the key advances are highlighted, and the advantages and limitations are discussed. Finally, future directions are discussed to promote creative thinking across disciplines to develop new methods or improve current methods for evaluating the gas content more accurately and efficiently.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
富含有机质页岩中气体含量的评估:历史、现状和未来方向回顾
页岩气因热值高、碳排放量低、储量大而被誉为未来的绿色能源。页岩的含气量是评估页岩气潜力和筛选页岩气甜点的关键参数。虽然含气量的概念已经得到了很好的定义,但获取可靠的含气量数据仍然是一项挑战。一个重要的障碍就是含气量的评估方法。在本文中,我们将对历史悠久和最新开发的含气量评估方法进行综述。在综述文章的第一部分,我们根据已发表和未发表的文献以及自身的经验,总结了自 1910 年代以来气体含量评估方法的历史。然后,介绍了气体含量评价所涉及的基本内容和概念,为这些方法提供了清晰的理论基础。第三部分系统回顾了 11 种评价方法,包括 4 种直接方法和 7 种间接方法。每种方法都介绍了其在含气量评价中的应用,强调了主要进展,并讨论了其优势和局限性。最后,讨论了未来的发展方向,以促进跨学科的创造性思维,开发新方法或改进现有方法,从而更准确、更高效地评估气体含量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoscience frontiers
Geoscience frontiers Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
17.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
147
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Geoscience Frontiers (GSF) is the Journal of China University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking University. It publishes peer-reviewed research articles and reviews in interdisciplinary fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences. GSF covers various research areas including petrology and geochemistry, lithospheric architecture and mantle dynamics, global tectonics, economic geology and fuel exploration, geophysics, stratigraphy and paleontology, environmental and engineering geology, astrogeology, and the nexus of resources-energy-emissions-climate under Sustainable Development Goals. The journal aims to bridge innovative, provocative, and challenging concepts and models in these fields, providing insights on correlations and evolution.
期刊最新文献
Change in the direction of Early Cretaceous tectonic extension in eastern North China Craton as the result of Paleo-Pacific/Eurasian plate interaction Consistent crystal orientation of core and rim pyrites indicates an epitaxial growth of rim in Carlin-type gold deposits Inter-basin groundwater flow in the Ordos Basin: Evidence of environmental isotope and hydrological investigations Magmatic initial and saturated water thresholds determine copper endowments: Insights from apatite F-Cl-OH compositions Laboratory experiments of carbon mineralization potential of the main terrestrial basalt reservoirs in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1