“It does change the narrative for health and social care” views of clinical and homeless service staff about the use of intellectual disability screening tools within homeless support pathways in the north of England

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-09-08 DOI:10.1111/jppi.12522
Dale Metcalfe, Karen McKenzie, George Murray, Alex Shirley
{"title":"“It does change the narrative for health and social care” views of clinical and homeless service staff about the use of intellectual disability screening tools within homeless support pathways in the north of England","authors":"Dale Metcalfe,&nbsp;Karen McKenzie,&nbsp;George Murray,&nbsp;Alex Shirley","doi":"10.1111/jppi.12522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Homelessness is a worldwide health inequality. People with intellectual disability represent a relatively high proportion of homeless people, and for many their intellectual disability is not recognised. The study intended to obtain stakeholder views about how intellectual disability screening can be integrated into the support pathway for people who are homeless. A qualitative approach was taken using Thematic Analysis. Nine staff, who work with homeless people or are involved in the intellectual disability assessment pathway, were interviewed. Analysis produced three themes, each containing two subthemes. ‘Current routes to support’ investigates experiences of the existing pathway; ‘Labels’, explores views about making intellectual disability visible; ‘Creating a pathway,’ outlines ideas about developing and implementing a screening pathway between services. The results help inform how current practices of identifying people with intellectual disability might be improved and the role of screening in this. These results, when combined with other research around screening tools, provide insight into how intellectual disability screening can be integrated within services.</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.12522","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jppi.12522","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Homelessness is a worldwide health inequality. People with intellectual disability represent a relatively high proportion of homeless people, and for many their intellectual disability is not recognised. The study intended to obtain stakeholder views about how intellectual disability screening can be integrated into the support pathway for people who are homeless. A qualitative approach was taken using Thematic Analysis. Nine staff, who work with homeless people or are involved in the intellectual disability assessment pathway, were interviewed. Analysis produced three themes, each containing two subthemes. ‘Current routes to support’ investigates experiences of the existing pathway; ‘Labels’, explores views about making intellectual disability visible; ‘Creating a pathway,’ outlines ideas about developing and implementing a screening pathway between services. The results help inform how current practices of identifying people with intellectual disability might be improved and the role of screening in this. These results, when combined with other research around screening tools, provide insight into how intellectual disability screening can be integrated within services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床和无家可归者服务人员对在英格兰北部无家可归者支持路径中使用智障筛查工具的看法:"它确实改变了对医疗和社会护理的看法"。
无家可归是世界范围内的一种健康不平等现象。智障人士在无家可归者中所占比例相对较高,而且许多人的智障并未得到承认。本研究旨在了解利益相关者对如何将智障筛查纳入无家可归者支持途径的看法。研究采用主题分析法进行定性分析。九名与无家可归者打交道或参与智障评估工作的工作人员接受了访谈。分析产生了三个主题,每个主题包含两个次主题。目前的支持途径 "调查了现有途径的经验;"标签 "探讨了关于让智障可见的观点;"创建途径 "概述了关于开发和实施服务间筛查途径的想法。研究结果有助于了解如何改善目前识别智障人士的做法以及筛查在其中的作用。这些结果与其他有关筛查工具的研究相结合,为如何将智障筛查纳入服务提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
What Would Have Helped People With Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities in the UK During COVID-19? Talk-LD and Talk-LD+: A pilot trial of school-based interventions to challenge discrimination and promote inclusion Moving toward a time-based and balanced quality of life Evaluation of an Australian community-based model of care for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities undergoing procedures under sedation After us, together with us: Quality of life in adults with disabilities in an inclusive and sustainable future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1