首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities最新文献

英文 中文
What Would Have Helped People With Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities in the UK During COVID-19? 在 COVID-19 期间,什么能帮助英国的重度智力和多重残疾人士?
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI: 10.1111/jppi.70000
Jill Bradshaw, Roseann Maguire, Amanda Gillooly, Christopher Hatton, Sue Caton, Andrew Jahoda, Edward Oloidi, Laurence Taggart, Stuart Todd, Richard Hastings

People with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities can be excluded from research and relatively little is known about the experiences of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities and their carers during COVID-19. This paper aims to further explore the impact on this group via information provided by paid and family carers. It focuses on key areas such as access to social and health services in addition to questions about health and well-being. In contextualising these results, some comparisons are made to impacts on other groups. This paper also explores what we might do better in future to support this population. Carers were invited to complete an online survey about their experiences and the experiences of people they supported during COVID-19 and to suggest what might have made life better. They were invited to complete this survey at four time points (waves) between December 2020 and December 2022. This paper reports on Waves 1–3, that is to August 2022. Services for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities reduced during COVID-19 and have yet to return to pre-pandemic levels. People with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities were reported to experience increased social isolation, deteriorating mental and physical health, increased behavioural signs of distress and reduced life skills. Three areas were identified regarding what would have made life better: opportunities for social contact and activities; improved access to health and social care services, and; consistent and responsive staff. Results are explored in the context of current challenges in service provision, including staff retention and shifts in staff culture during the pandemic.

深度智障和多重残疾人士可能被排除在研究之外,而人们对深度智障和多重残疾人士及其照护者在 COVID-19 期间的经历知之甚少。本文旨在通过有偿照护者和家庭照护者提供的信息,进一步探讨对这一群体的影响。除了有关健康和福祉的问题外,本文还重点关注了社会和医疗服务的获取等关键领域。在对这些结果进行背景分析时,本文将对其他群体受到的影响进行一些比较。本文还探讨了我们今后如何更好地为这一群体提供支持。我们邀请照护者完成一份在线调查,了解他们和他们所支持的人在 COVID-19 期间的经历,并就如何让生活变得更好提出建议。他们受邀在 2020 年 12 月至 2022 年 12 月期间的四个时间点(波次)完成这项调查。本文报告的是第 1-3 波,即截至 2022 年 8 月的情况。在 COVID-19 期间,为深度智障和多重残疾人士提供的服务有所减少,目前尚未恢复到大流行前的水平。据报告,重度智障和多重残疾人士的社会隔离度增加、身心健康恶化、痛苦的行为迹象增加以及生活技能下降。我们确定了三个可以改善生活的领域:社会接触和活动的机会;更好地获得医疗和社会护理服务;以及始终如一、有求必应的工作人员。研究结果结合了当前在提供服务方面面临的挑战,包括大流行病期间员工的留用和员工文化的转变。
{"title":"What Would Have Helped People With Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities in the UK During COVID-19?","authors":"Jill Bradshaw,&nbsp;Roseann Maguire,&nbsp;Amanda Gillooly,&nbsp;Christopher Hatton,&nbsp;Sue Caton,&nbsp;Andrew Jahoda,&nbsp;Edward Oloidi,&nbsp;Laurence Taggart,&nbsp;Stuart Todd,&nbsp;Richard Hastings","doi":"10.1111/jppi.70000","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.70000","url":null,"abstract":"<p>People with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities can be excluded from research and relatively little is known about the experiences of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities and their carers during COVID-19. This paper aims to further explore the impact on this group via information provided by paid and family carers. It focuses on key areas such as access to social and health services in addition to questions about health and well-being. In contextualising these results, some comparisons are made to impacts on other groups. This paper also explores what we might do better in future to support this population. Carers were invited to complete an online survey about their experiences and the experiences of people they supported during COVID-19 and to suggest what might have made life better. They were invited to complete this survey at four time points (waves) between December 2020 and December 2022. This paper reports on Waves 1–3, that is to August 2022. Services for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities reduced during COVID-19 and have yet to return to pre-pandemic levels. People with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities were reported to experience increased social isolation, deteriorating mental and physical health, increased behavioural signs of distress and reduced life skills. Three areas were identified regarding what would have made life better: opportunities for social contact and activities; improved access to health and social care services, and; consistent and responsive staff. Results are explored in the context of current challenges in service provision, including staff retention and shifts in staff culture during the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"21 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.70000","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142707873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Talk-LD and Talk-LD+: A pilot trial of school-based interventions to challenge discrimination and promote inclusion Talk-LD 和 Talk-LD+:挑战歧视、促进包容的校本干预试点试验
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-10-13 DOI: 10.1111/jppi.12526
Roseann Maguire, Alastair Wilson, Richard P. Hastings, Kartina Scior, Andrew Jahoda

To counteract stigma and discrimination a series of five lessons Talk about Learning Disability (Talk-LD) to promote young people's understanding and acceptance of people with intellectual disabilities were developed for the Scottish secondary school curriculum. This study examined the feasibility of carrying out a randomised control trial comparing the delivery of the lessons alone with the lessons plus an attempt to promote positive contact between participating students and people with intellectual disabilities. The aim was to recruit and randomise 12 schools to receive the lessons alone or the lessons plus contact. The Attitudes Towards Intellectual Disability (ATTID) questionnaire was completed at baseline and a questionnaire about students' understanding of the lesson content was completed at follow-up alone. Twelve schools were recruited and randomised. The lessons were delivered to 23 classes across the 12 schools. Baseline data were obtained for 480 participants. However, school closures due to COVID-19 meant that follow-up data were only obtained from 220 students (six schools) prior to school closures. The attitude measure only detected change in one ATTID scale, indicating students may be more willing to interact with a person with intellectual disabilities post intervention. Three of the six schools randomised to the lessons plus contact group had plans in place for joint activities between students and young people with an intellectual disability. Despite the disruption caused by the Covid pandemic, the findings were encouraging in relation to future research on the Talk-LD lessons. The schools also engaged positively with the process of promoting positive contact with young people with an intellectual disability.

为了消除耻辱感和歧视,苏格兰中学课程开发了五个系列的 "谈谈学习障碍"(Talk-LD)课程,以促进青少年对智障人士的理解和接纳。本研究探讨了进行随机对照试验的可行性,比较了单独授课与在授课的同时尝试促进参与学生与智障人士之间的积极接触。研究的目的是招募 12 所学校并随机分配,让他们接受单纯的课程或课程加接触。在基线阶段填写对智障人士的态度(ATTID)问卷,在后续阶段单独填写关于学生对课程内容理解的问卷。共招募了 12 所学校并进行了随机分组。课程在 12 所学校的 23 个班级进行。共获得了 480 名参与者的基线数据。然而,由于 COVID-19 导致学校关闭,因此在学校关闭之前只获得了 220 名学生(6 所学校)的后续数据。态度测量只检测到一个 ATTID 量表的变化,这表明干预后学生可能更愿意与智障人士互动。在被随机分配到 "上课加接触 "组的六所学校中,有三所学校已经制定了学生与智障青少年开展联合活动的计划。尽管科威德疫情造成了一定的影响,但研究结果对于今后开展 "谈话--残疾 "课程的研究还是令人鼓舞的。学校也积极地参与了促进与智障青少年积极接触的过程。
{"title":"Talk-LD and Talk-LD+: A pilot trial of school-based interventions to challenge discrimination and promote inclusion","authors":"Roseann Maguire,&nbsp;Alastair Wilson,&nbsp;Richard P. Hastings,&nbsp;Kartina Scior,&nbsp;Andrew Jahoda","doi":"10.1111/jppi.12526","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12526","url":null,"abstract":"<p>To counteract stigma and discrimination a series of five lessons Talk about Learning Disability (<i>Talk-LD</i>) to promote young people's understanding and acceptance of people with intellectual disabilities were developed for the Scottish secondary school curriculum. This study examined the feasibility of carrying out a randomised control trial comparing the delivery of the lessons alone with the lessons plus an attempt to promote positive contact between participating students and people with intellectual disabilities. The aim was to recruit and randomise 12 schools to receive the lessons alone or the lessons plus contact. The Attitudes Towards Intellectual Disability (ATTID) questionnaire was completed at baseline and a questionnaire about students' understanding of the lesson content was completed at follow-up alone. Twelve schools were recruited and randomised. The lessons were delivered to 23 classes across the 12 schools. Baseline data were obtained for 480 participants. However, school closures due to COVID-19 meant that follow-up data were only obtained from 220 students (six schools) prior to school closures. The attitude measure only detected change in one ATTID scale, indicating students may be more willing to interact with a person with intellectual disabilities post intervention. Three of the six schools randomised to the lessons plus contact group had plans in place for joint activities between students and young people with an intellectual disability. Despite the disruption caused by the Covid pandemic, the findings were encouraging in relation to future research on the <i>Talk-LD</i> lessons. The schools also engaged positively with the process of promoting positive contact with young people with an intellectual disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"21 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.12526","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142435589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Moving toward a time-based and balanced quality of life 向基于时间的均衡生活质量迈进
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-10-06 DOI: 10.1111/jppi.12530
Teresa Maria Sgaramella

Current complex life conditions and changing developmental contexts draw attention to the concept of capabilities, the various combinations of functions a person can do or can be, and the opportunities to achieve them. A future-oriented time perspective is a dimension along which individuals express meaning-making of experiences and expectations regarding their lives, a benchmark for the well-being and satisfaction of the quality of life they experience. Findings from research studies involving adults with disabilities and family members of persons with a disability provide evidence for a time-based model, an approach tapping into both the concept and measurement of quality of life and balancing both current and expected quality of life.

当前复杂的生活条件和不断变化的发展背景促使人们关注能力的概念、一个人可以做的或可以成为的各种功能组合以及实现这些功能的机会。面向未来的时间视角是一个维度,个人据此表达对自己生活的体验和期望的意义建构,是他们体验到的生活质量的幸福感和满意度的基准。涉及成年残疾人和残疾人家庭成员的调查研究结果为基于时间的模式提供了证据,这种方法既考虑到了生活质量的概念和衡量标准,又平衡了当前生活质量和预期生活质量。
{"title":"Moving toward a time-based and balanced quality of life","authors":"Teresa Maria Sgaramella","doi":"10.1111/jppi.12530","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12530","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Current complex life conditions and changing developmental contexts draw attention to the concept of <i>capabilities</i>, the various combinations of functions a person can do or can be, and the opportunities to achieve them. A future-oriented time perspective is a dimension along which individuals express meaning-making of experiences and expectations regarding their lives, a benchmark for the well-being and satisfaction of the quality of life they experience. Findings from research studies involving adults with disabilities and family members of persons with a disability provide evidence for a time-based model, an approach tapping into both the concept and measurement of quality of life and balancing both current and expected quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"21 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.12530","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142429431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of an Australian community-based model of care for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities undergoing procedures under sedation 对澳大利亚基于社区的智力和发育障碍成人镇静手术护理模式的评估
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-10-06 DOI: 10.1111/jppi.12528
Janet Golder, Reece Adams, Shenae Calleja, Michelle Templeton, Abby Foster

Background

Adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) have higher healthcare needs, but experience difficulties accessing preventative healthcare. Despite this inequity, models of care that address barriers and provide customized treatment are limited, exacerbating vulnerabilities and poorer health outcomes. This study describes the development of a procedural model of care (PMOC) for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities, and evaluates the sedation tier, exploring procedure and sedation outcomes.

Methods

Development of the PMOC was informed by current evidence and themes identified in stakeholder consultation and literature. A retrospective cohort study evaluated the sedation option within the model, conducted at a community-based disability service in Melbourne, Australia. All records over a 14-month period were included. Descriptive statistics and univariate logistic regression analysis were used to analyze data.

Results

The PMOC includes assessment, intervention, and evaluation tiers. Intervention options range from least to most invasive, culminating in the sedation level (mild; oral psychoactive, moderate; midazolam and nitrous oxide, high; general anesthetic). A total of 127 adults with IDDs received procedures under sedation; median age was 26 years, 61% lived with family, and 81% had multiple disabilities. A total of 197 procedures were referred to CDDH, including immunization (61%) and oral health reviews (23%), and resulted in 98% completion rate. Mild (n = 36) and moderate (n = 95) sedation were used for 67% of procedures. The PMOC correctly predicted 91% of sedation requirements. Living with family (OR 2.211, 95% CI 1.001–4.885, p = 0.05); immunization (OR 7.935, 95% CI 4.025–15.644, p <0.001); and multiple disabilities (OR 3.064, 95% CI 1.123–8.362, p = 0.029) were associated with mild, moderate and high sedation options, respectively.

Conclusions

Models of care offering individualized interventions can support adults with IDDs to receive preventative procedures. Demographic variables may be able to predict sedation requirements. Wider application of this model may reduce health inequity within this vulnerable population.

背景有智力和发育障碍(IDDs)的成年人有更高的医疗保健需求,但却很难获得预防性医疗保健服务。尽管存在这种不公平现象,但能够消除障碍并提供定制治疗的护理模式却很有限,这加剧了他们的脆弱性,并使他们的健康状况更加糟糕。本研究介绍了针对智力和发育障碍成人的程序性护理模式(PMOC)的发展情况,并对镇静层级进行了评估,探讨了程序和镇静结果。 方法 根据当前的证据以及利益相关者咨询和文献中确定的主题,制定了程序性护理模式(PMOC)。在澳大利亚墨尔本的一家社区残疾人服务机构开展了一项回顾性队列研究,对该模型中的镇静选项进行了评估。研究纳入了 14 个月内的所有记录。数据分析采用了描述性统计和单变量逻辑回归分析。 结果 PMOC 包括评估、干预和评价三个层次。干预选项的范围从侵入性最小到侵入性最大,最后是镇静级别(轻度;口服精神活性药物;中度;咪达唑仑和氧化亚氮;高度;全身麻醉)。共有 127 名患有 IDD 的成年人在镇静状态下接受了手术;年龄中位数为 26 岁,61% 与家人同住,81% 患有多种残疾。共有 197 例手术转介至 CDDH,包括免疫接种(61%)和口腔健康检查(23%),完成率为 98%。67%的手术使用了轻度(36人)和中度(95人)镇静剂。PMOC 正确预测了 91% 的镇静要求。与家人同住(OR 2.211,95% CI 1.001-4.885,p = 0.05)、免疫(OR 7.935,95% CI 4.025-15.644,p <0.001)和多重残疾(OR 3.064,95% CI 1.123-8.362,p = 0.029)分别与轻度、中度和高度镇静选择有关。 结论 提供个性化干预的护理模式可以帮助患有 IDD 的成年人接受预防性治疗。人口统计学变量可以预测镇静要求。更广泛地应用这种模式可以减少这一弱势群体中的健康不平等现象。
{"title":"Evaluation of an Australian community-based model of care for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities undergoing procedures under sedation","authors":"Janet Golder,&nbsp;Reece Adams,&nbsp;Shenae Calleja,&nbsp;Michelle Templeton,&nbsp;Abby Foster","doi":"10.1111/jppi.12528","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12528","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) have higher healthcare needs, but experience difficulties accessing preventative healthcare. Despite this inequity, models of care that address barriers and provide customized treatment are limited, exacerbating vulnerabilities and poorer health outcomes. This study describes the development of a procedural model of care (PMOC) for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities, and evaluates the sedation tier, exploring procedure and sedation outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Development of the PMOC was informed by current evidence and themes identified in stakeholder consultation and literature. A retrospective cohort study evaluated the sedation option within the model, conducted at a community-based disability service in Melbourne, Australia. All records over a 14-month period were included. Descriptive statistics and univariate logistic regression analysis were used to analyze data.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The PMOC includes assessment, intervention, and evaluation tiers. Intervention options range from least to most invasive, culminating in the sedation level (mild; oral psychoactive, moderate; midazolam and nitrous oxide, high; general anesthetic). A total of 127 adults with IDDs received procedures under sedation; median age was 26 years, 61% lived with family, and 81% had multiple disabilities. A total of 197 procedures were referred to CDDH, including immunization (61%) and oral health reviews (23%), and resulted in 98% completion rate. Mild (<i>n =</i> 36) and moderate (<i>n =</i> 95) sedation were used for 67% of procedures. The PMOC correctly predicted 91% of sedation requirements. Living with family (OR 2.211, 95% CI 1.001–4.885, <i>p</i> = 0.05); immunization (OR 7.935, 95% CI 4.025–15.644, <i>p</i> &lt;0.001); and multiple disabilities (OR 3.064, 95% CI 1.123–8.362, <i>p</i> = 0.029) were associated with mild, moderate and high sedation options, respectively.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Models of care offering individualized interventions can support adults with IDDs to receive preventative procedures. Demographic variables may be able to predict sedation requirements. Wider application of this model may reduce health inequity within this vulnerable population.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"21 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.12528","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142429488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
After us, together with us: Quality of life in adults with disabilities in an inclusive and sustainable future 在我们之后,与我们一起:在包容和可持续的未来中提高成年残疾人的生活质量
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1111/jppi.12527
Sara Santilli, Maria Cristina Ginevra, Courtney Bishop, Laura Nota

Due to economic and technological progress, life expectancy is constantly developing, thus the European senior generation is ever-increasing. Such demographic modifications have far reached consequences on social protection systems and society. Specifically, the last 20 years have also seen a significant increase in life expectancy for people with disabilities and their elderly parents who care for them. Therefore, this contribution provides an overview of the quality of life for adults with intellectual disabilities and their elderly parents. Specifically, this paper examines the notion of quality of life, especially in its relationship with sustainability, inclusion, and social justice. Lastly, it examines the contextual factors that contribute to promoting or hindering the quality of life of individuals with intellectual disabilities and the impact on social inclusion, sustainability, and social justice.

由于经济和技术的进步,人们的预期寿命不断延长,因此欧洲老年人口不断增加。这种人口结构的变化对社会保障体系和社会产生了深远的影响。具体而言,在过去 20 年中,残疾人及其照顾他们的老年父母的预期寿命也有了显著增长。因此,本文概述了成年智障人士及其年长父母的生活质量。具体而言,本文探讨了生活质量的概念,尤其是其与可持续性、包容性和社会公正之间的关系。最后,本文探讨了促进或阻碍智障人士生活质量的背景因素,以及对社会包容、可持续性和社会公正的影响。
{"title":"After us, together with us: Quality of life in adults with disabilities in an inclusive and sustainable future","authors":"Sara Santilli,&nbsp;Maria Cristina Ginevra,&nbsp;Courtney Bishop,&nbsp;Laura Nota","doi":"10.1111/jppi.12527","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12527","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Due to economic and technological progress, life expectancy is constantly developing, thus the European senior generation is ever-increasing. Such demographic modifications have far reached consequences on social protection systems and society. Specifically, the last 20 years have also seen a significant increase in life expectancy for people with disabilities and their elderly parents who care for them. Therefore, this contribution provides an overview of the quality of life for adults with intellectual disabilities and their elderly parents. Specifically, this paper examines the notion of quality of life, especially in its relationship with sustainability, inclusion, and social justice. Lastly, it examines the contextual factors that contribute to promoting or hindering the quality of life of individuals with intellectual disabilities and the impact on social inclusion, sustainability, and social justice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"21 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.12527","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142428945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Specialized medical equipment for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities allocated in Home and Community Based Services 分配给家庭和社区服务中的智力和发育障碍人士的专用医疗设备
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI: 10.1111/jppi.12525
Carli Friedman

Specialized medical equipment, includes both durable medical equipment—nondisposable, reusable medical equipment—and nondurable medical equipment—disposable, often one time use medical supplies. The aim of this study was to examine if, and how, states allocated specialized medical equipment for people with IDD in their Medicaid HCBS programs. To do so, we examined Medicaid HCBS 1915(c) waivers for people with IDD from across the United States. We found 55 waivers (51.40%) from 27 states (60.00%) provided 71 specialized medical equipment services to people with IDD. HCBS waivers projected spending $61 million on specialized medical equipment for 33 305 people with IDD. The average annual spending per person was $2433. In addition to helping promote community living and integration, for some people with IDD, specialized medical equipment can be life sustaining; as such, it is critical that unmet needs for specialized medical equipment not go unaddressed.

专用医疗设备包括耐用医疗设备(非一次性、可重复使用的医疗设备)和非耐用医疗设备(一次性、通常只使用一次的医疗用品)。本研究旨在考察各州是否以及如何在其医疗补助 HCBS 计划中为 IDD 患者分配专用医疗设备。为此,我们研究了全美各州为 IDD 患者提供的医疗补助 HCBS 1915(c) 特例。我们发现,来自 27 个州(60.00%)的 55 个减免计划(51.40%)为 IDD 患者提供了 71 项专业医疗设备服务。HCBS 减免计划预计将为 33 305 名 IDD 患者花费 6 100 万美元购买专业医疗设备。每人每年的平均支出为 2433 美元。除了帮助促进社区生活和融合之外,对于一些 IDD 患者来说,专业医疗设备还可以维持他们的生命;因此,至关重要的是,未得到满足的专业医疗设备需求不能得不到解决。
{"title":"Specialized medical equipment for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities allocated in Home and Community Based Services","authors":"Carli Friedman","doi":"10.1111/jppi.12525","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12525","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Specialized medical equipment, includes both durable medical equipment—nondisposable, reusable medical equipment—and nondurable medical equipment—disposable, often one time use medical supplies. The aim of this study was to examine if, and how, states allocated specialized medical equipment for people with IDD in their Medicaid HCBS programs. To do so, we examined Medicaid HCBS 1915(c) waivers for people with IDD from across the United States. We found 55 waivers (51.40%) from 27 states (60.00%) provided 71 specialized medical equipment services to people with IDD. HCBS waivers projected spending $61 million on specialized medical equipment for 33 305 people with IDD. The average annual spending per person was $2433. In addition to helping promote community living and integration, for some people with IDD, specialized medical equipment can be life sustaining; as such, it is critical that unmet needs for specialized medical equipment not go unaddressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"21 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.12525","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142275056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Remote consultation: The experiences of community intellectual disability teams 远程咨询:社区智障团队的经验
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1111/jppi.12523
Heather Welsh, Alistair Farquharson, Laura Nicholson

The use of remote technology, via telephone and video, was rapidly introduced across health services at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic and is likely to future. This study investigated the experience and opinions of staff working in Specialist Intellectual Disability Community Teams, with the aim of clarifying the advantages and disadvantages of remote technology in this setting and helping to guide service development. Fourteen members of staff from seven different health disciplines across seven NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Community Intellectual Disability Teams were interviewed using a semi-structured format. Thematic analysis identified three overarching themes: use of remote technology; efficiency and limitations. Participants reported clear efficiency advantages using remote technology but some challenges with communication and completing comprehensive patient assessments. There was support for the ongoing use of remote technology in the assessment and treatment of people with intellectual disability, particularly for multidisciplinary meetings. However, participants also described a need for face to face assessments, particularly for people with more severe intellectual disability, with complex care needs or when particular assessments are required (such as a new patient appointment or physical assessment).

在 COVID-19 大流行之初,远程技术(通过电话和视频)就被迅速引入到医疗服务中,并有可能在未来继续使用。本研究调查了智障社区专业团队工作人员的经验和观点,旨在阐明远程技术在这一环境中的优缺点,并帮助指导服务发展。我们采用半结构化访谈的形式,对来自七个国家医疗服务系统(NHS)大格拉斯哥和克莱德社区智障小组的七个不同医疗学科的 14 名工作人员进行了访谈。专题分析确定了三大主题:远程技术的使用、效率和局限性。参与者表示,使用远程技术在提高效率方面有明显优势,但在沟通和完成全面的患者评估方面存在一些挑战。与会者支持在智障人士的评估和治疗中持续使用远程技术,尤其是在多学科会议中。不过,与会者也表示有必要进行面对面的评估,尤其是对智障程度较重、有复杂护理需求或需要进行特殊评估(如新患者预约或身体评估)的患者。
{"title":"Remote consultation: The experiences of community intellectual disability teams","authors":"Heather Welsh,&nbsp;Alistair Farquharson,&nbsp;Laura Nicholson","doi":"10.1111/jppi.12523","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12523","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The use of remote technology, via telephone and video, was rapidly introduced across health services at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic and is likely to future. This study investigated the experience and opinions of staff working in Specialist Intellectual Disability Community Teams, with the aim of clarifying the advantages and disadvantages of remote technology in this setting and helping to guide service development. Fourteen members of staff from seven different health disciplines across seven NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Community Intellectual Disability Teams were interviewed using a semi-structured format. Thematic analysis identified three overarching themes: use of remote technology; efficiency and limitations. Participants reported clear efficiency advantages using remote technology but some challenges with communication and completing comprehensive patient assessments. There was support for the ongoing use of remote technology in the assessment and treatment of people with intellectual disability, particularly for multidisciplinary meetings. However, participants also described a need for face to face assessments, particularly for people with more severe intellectual disability, with complex care needs or when particular assessments are required (such as a new patient appointment or physical assessment).</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142169877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advances and gaps in policy, practice, and research in transition for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities across four countries 四个国家在智力和发育障碍学生过渡政策、实践和研究方面的进展和差距
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI: 10.1111/jppi.12524
Jan Šiška, Julie Beadle-Brown, Renáta Tichá, Roger Stancliffe, Brian Abery, Šárka Káňová

The difficulties faced by youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) and their families as they move into adulthood are widely documented. The aim of the paper is to explore the current situation in terms of transition processes and outcomes in four countries (the US, UK, Australia and Czech Republic) and identify commonalities and differences that help elucidate what might determine different outcomes. Two research methods—expert knowledge and rapid literature review—were combined to identify sources from which information on transition policy, processes, support practices and outcomes was extracted and synthesised. This review identified gaps in the research evidence including inadequate collection and use of data to drive policy and determine effectiveness, limited evidence-based models or frameworks for successful transition. There was little transition research that included the voices of young people with IDD. More research is necessary to study the practices of highly successful programmes, and to explore the impact of transition programmes and disability support services on a broader range of outcomes, capturing the experiences of young people themselves and identifying factors that determine successful outcomes.

有智力和发育障碍(IDDs)的青少年及其家庭在步入成年期时所面临的困难已被广泛记录在案。本文旨在探讨四个国家(美国、英国、澳大利亚和捷克共和国)在过渡过程和结果方面的现状,并找出共性和差异,以帮助阐明可能决定不同结果的因素。我们结合了两种研究方法--专家知识和快速文献综述--来确定信息来源,并从中提取和综合有关过渡政策、过程、支持实践和结果的信息。这次审查发现了研究证据方面的差距,包括没有充分收集和使用数据来推动政策和确定成效,基于证据的成功过渡模式或框架有限。很少有过渡研究包含智障青少年的声音。有必要开展更多的研究,以研究非常成功的计划的做法,探讨过渡计划和残疾支持服务对更广泛的结果的影响,捕捉年轻人自己的经验,并确定决定成功结果的因素。
{"title":"Advances and gaps in policy, practice, and research in transition for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities across four countries","authors":"Jan Šiška,&nbsp;Julie Beadle-Brown,&nbsp;Renáta Tichá,&nbsp;Roger Stancliffe,&nbsp;Brian Abery,&nbsp;Šárka Káňová","doi":"10.1111/jppi.12524","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12524","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The difficulties faced by youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) and their families as they move into adulthood are widely documented. The aim of the paper is to explore the current situation in terms of transition processes and outcomes in four countries (the US, UK, Australia and Czech Republic) and identify commonalities and differences that help elucidate what might determine different outcomes. Two research methods—expert knowledge and rapid literature review—were combined to identify sources from which information on transition policy, processes, support practices and outcomes was extracted and synthesised. This review identified gaps in the research evidence including inadequate collection and use of data to drive policy and determine effectiveness, limited evidence-based models or frameworks for successful transition. There was little transition research that included the voices of young people with IDD. More research is necessary to study the practices of highly successful programmes, and to explore the impact of transition programmes and disability support services on a broader range of outcomes, capturing the experiences of young people themselves and identifying factors that determine successful outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.12524","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142169858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“It does change the narrative for health and social care” views of clinical and homeless service staff about the use of intellectual disability screening tools within homeless support pathways in the north of England 临床和无家可归者服务人员对在英格兰北部无家可归者支持路径中使用智障筛查工具的看法:"它确实改变了对医疗和社会护理的看法"。
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-09-08 DOI: 10.1111/jppi.12522
Dale Metcalfe, Karen McKenzie, George Murray, Alex Shirley

Homelessness is a worldwide health inequality. People with intellectual disability represent a relatively high proportion of homeless people, and for many their intellectual disability is not recognised. The study intended to obtain stakeholder views about how intellectual disability screening can be integrated into the support pathway for people who are homeless. A qualitative approach was taken using Thematic Analysis. Nine staff, who work with homeless people or are involved in the intellectual disability assessment pathway, were interviewed. Analysis produced three themes, each containing two subthemes. ‘Current routes to support’ investigates experiences of the existing pathway; ‘Labels’, explores views about making intellectual disability visible; ‘Creating a pathway,’ outlines ideas about developing and implementing a screening pathway between services. The results help inform how current practices of identifying people with intellectual disability might be improved and the role of screening in this. These results, when combined with other research around screening tools, provide insight into how intellectual disability screening can be integrated within services.

无家可归是世界范围内的一种健康不平等现象。智障人士在无家可归者中所占比例相对较高,而且许多人的智障并未得到承认。本研究旨在了解利益相关者对如何将智障筛查纳入无家可归者支持途径的看法。研究采用主题分析法进行定性分析。九名与无家可归者打交道或参与智障评估工作的工作人员接受了访谈。分析产生了三个主题,每个主题包含两个次主题。目前的支持途径 "调查了现有途径的经验;"标签 "探讨了关于让智障可见的观点;"创建途径 "概述了关于开发和实施服务间筛查途径的想法。研究结果有助于了解如何改善目前识别智障人士的做法以及筛查在其中的作用。这些结果与其他有关筛查工具的研究相结合,为如何将智障筛查纳入服务提供了启示。
{"title":"“It does change the narrative for health and social care” views of clinical and homeless service staff about the use of intellectual disability screening tools within homeless support pathways in the north of England","authors":"Dale Metcalfe,&nbsp;Karen McKenzie,&nbsp;George Murray,&nbsp;Alex Shirley","doi":"10.1111/jppi.12522","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12522","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Homelessness is a worldwide health inequality. People with intellectual disability represent a relatively high proportion of homeless people, and for many their intellectual disability is not recognised. The study intended to obtain stakeholder views about how intellectual disability screening can be integrated into the support pathway for people who are homeless. A qualitative approach was taken using Thematic Analysis. Nine staff, who work with homeless people or are involved in the intellectual disability assessment pathway, were interviewed. Analysis produced three themes, each containing two subthemes. ‘Current routes to support’ investigates experiences of the existing pathway; ‘Labels’, explores views about making intellectual disability visible; ‘Creating a pathway,’ outlines ideas about developing and implementing a screening pathway between services. The results help inform how current practices of identifying people with intellectual disability might be improved and the role of screening in this. These results, when combined with other research around screening tools, provide insight into how intellectual disability screening can be integrated within services.</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.12522","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142158667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transitional challenges: Psychotropic medication and residential setting among young adults with intellectual disabilities 过渡时期的挑战:有智力障碍的年轻成年人的精神药物治疗和住宿环境
IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI: 10.1111/jppi.12521
James Houseworth, Renáta Tichá, Sandra L. Pettingell, Roger J. Stancliffe, Julie Bershadsky

As youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are transitioning from the school systems and special education supports, many of them are moving into the adult service system (e.g., Vocational Rehabilitation, Home and Community-Based Services). Thus, in addition to adolescence being a source of many psychological and behavioral needs, the change in service systems often leads to uncertainty and anxiety. Psychotropic medications tend to be used to treat challenging behavior and psychological conditions (e.g., depression, anxiety, psychosis). This study used National Core Indicators-In-Person Survey 2020–2021 data to explore the prevalence of psychotropic medication use among two groups of people with IDD: disability service users of transition age (18–25 years) and disability service users of adult age (26–45 years) and the role of residential settings (where one lives) as related to psychotropic medication use. The results indicated that adults (aged 26–45 years) are more likely to be prescribed psychotropic medications. This appears to be driven by the larger number of transition-aged adults who still live with family, where prescription rates are much lower. Psychotropic drug use is an important issue due to its potential to lead to unintended negative consequences that affect health, social inclusion, and self-determination if not carefully and effectively administered.

随着智力和发育障碍(IDD)青少年从学校系统和特殊教育支持过渡到成人服务系统(如职业康复、家庭和社区服务等),他们中的许多人都将进入成人服务系统。因此,除了青春期会产生许多心理和行为需求外,服务体系的变化也往往会导致不确定性和焦虑。精神药物通常用于治疗具有挑战性的行为和心理状况(如抑郁、焦虑、精神病)。本研究利用 2020-2021 年全国核心指标个人调查数据,探讨了两类 IDD 患者使用精神药物的普遍程度:过渡年龄段(18-25 岁)的残疾服务使用者和成年年龄段(26-45 岁)的残疾服务使用者,以及居住环境(居住地)在精神药物使用中的作用。结果表明,成年人(26-45 岁)更有可能被处方精神药物。这似乎是由于仍与家人生活在一起的过渡年龄成人人数较多,而他们的处方率要低得多。精神药物的使用是一个重要问题,因为如果不谨慎有效地使用,有可能导致意想不到的负面后果,影响健康、社会融入和自决。
{"title":"Transitional challenges: Psychotropic medication and residential setting among young adults with intellectual disabilities","authors":"James Houseworth,&nbsp;Renáta Tichá,&nbsp;Sandra L. Pettingell,&nbsp;Roger J. Stancliffe,&nbsp;Julie Bershadsky","doi":"10.1111/jppi.12521","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12521","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are transitioning from the school systems and special education supports, many of them are moving into the adult service system (e.g., Vocational Rehabilitation, Home and Community-Based Services). Thus, in addition to adolescence being a source of many psychological and behavioral needs, the change in service systems often leads to uncertainty and anxiety. Psychotropic medications tend to be used to treat challenging behavior and psychological conditions (e.g., depression, anxiety, psychosis). This study used National Core Indicators-In-Person Survey 2020–2021 data to explore the prevalence of psychotropic medication use among two groups of people with IDD: disability service users of transition age (18–25 years) and disability service users of adult age (26–45 years) and the role of residential settings (where one lives) as related to psychotropic medication use. The results indicated that adults (aged 26–45 years) are more likely to be prescribed psychotropic medications. This appears to be driven by the larger number of transition-aged adults who still live with family, where prescription rates are much lower. Psychotropic drug use is an important issue due to its potential to lead to unintended negative consequences that affect health, social inclusion, and self-determination if not carefully and effectively administered.</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141980461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1