Isaiah Nelsen, Melissa Weinrich and Scott E. Lewis*,
{"title":"Students’ Sensemaking of Electrostatic Potential Maps within Substitution and Elimination Reactions","authors":"Isaiah Nelsen, Melissa Weinrich and Scott E. Lewis*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0069610.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Reaction mechanisms are a difficult and foundational topic students encounter in organic chemistry. Consequently, students often memorize when attempting to learn the array of organic reactions. While interventions have been offered to encourage mechanistic reasoning as an alternative approach, a deeper struggle pertaining to students’ comprehension of the underlying chemical principles driving reaction mechanisms is still prevalent. In this study, electrostatic potential maps (EPMs) were explored as a tool students could use to reason with some of these principles to predict and explain the outcomes of a reaction. Through semistructured interviews, 19 students’ sense-making strategies were recorded and analyzed to uncover how they used the features of EPMs with concealed atomic identities and how they reconciled their answers once the identities were made explicit. Analysis revealed that the absence of atomic identities generated approaches centered around electron densities and their utility in predicting reaction mechanisms and outcomes. As the atomic identities were revealed, the majority of participants reverted to memorized mechanisms, while six participants attempted to relate the atomic identities to the interactions of the electron densities. These findings suggest utility in implementing EPMs in the organic chemistry curriculum and offer a feasible intervention to promote sense-making when students reason with organic reactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00696","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reaction mechanisms are a difficult and foundational topic students encounter in organic chemistry. Consequently, students often memorize when attempting to learn the array of organic reactions. While interventions have been offered to encourage mechanistic reasoning as an alternative approach, a deeper struggle pertaining to students’ comprehension of the underlying chemical principles driving reaction mechanisms is still prevalent. In this study, electrostatic potential maps (EPMs) were explored as a tool students could use to reason with some of these principles to predict and explain the outcomes of a reaction. Through semistructured interviews, 19 students’ sense-making strategies were recorded and analyzed to uncover how they used the features of EPMs with concealed atomic identities and how they reconciled their answers once the identities were made explicit. Analysis revealed that the absence of atomic identities generated approaches centered around electron densities and their utility in predicting reaction mechanisms and outcomes. As the atomic identities were revealed, the majority of participants reverted to memorized mechanisms, while six participants attempted to relate the atomic identities to the interactions of the electron densities. These findings suggest utility in implementing EPMs in the organic chemistry curriculum and offer a feasible intervention to promote sense-making when students reason with organic reactions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.